Literature DB >> 33321541

Why Ecological Momentary Assessment Surveys Go Incomplete: When It Happens and How It Impacts Data.

Yu-Hsiang Wu1, Jingjing Xu2, Elizabeth Stangl1, Shareka Pentony2, Dhruv Vyas3, Octav Chipara3, Anna Gudjonsdottir4, Jacob Oleson4, Jason Galster2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) often requires respondents to complete surveys in the moment to report real-time experiences. Because EMA may seem disruptive or intrusive, respondents may not complete surveys as directed in certain circumstances.
PURPOSE: This article aims to determine the effect of environmental characteristics on the likelihood of instances where respondents do not complete EMA surveys (referred to as survey incompletion), and to estimate the impact of survey incompletion on EMA self-report data. RESEARCH
DESIGN: An observational study. STUDY SAMPLE: Ten adults hearing aid (HA) users. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Experienced, bilateral HA users were recruited and fit with study HAs. The study HAs were equipped with real-time data loggers, an algorithm that logged the data generated by HAs (e.g., overall sound level, environment classification, and feature status including microphone mode and amount of gain reduction). The study HAs were also connected via Bluetooth to a smartphone app, which collected the real-time data logging data as well as presented the participants with EMA surveys about their listening environments and experiences. The participants were sent out to wear the HAs and complete surveys for 1 week. Real-time data logging was triggered when participants completed surveys and when participants ignored or snoozed surveys. Data logging data were used to estimate the effect of environmental characteristics on the likelihood of survey incompletion, and to predict participants' responses to survey questions in the instances of survey incompletion.
RESULTS: Across the 10 participants, 715 surveys were completed and survey incompletion occurred 228 times. Mixed effects logistic regression models indicated that survey incompletion was more likely to happen in the environments that were less quiet and contained more speech, noise, and machine sounds, and in the environments wherein directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms were enabled. The results of survey response prediction further indicated that the participants could have reported more challenging environments and more listening difficulty in the instances of survey incompletion. However, the difference in the distribution of survey responses between the observed responses and the combined observed and predicted responses was small.
CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that EMA survey incompletion occurs systematically. Although survey incompletion could bias EMA self-report data, the impact is likely to be small. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33321541      PMCID: PMC9135175          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.245


  15 in total

1.  Case-study analysis of various field study measures.

Authors:  Jill E Preminger; David R Cunningham
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment of hearing difficulties encountered by hearing aid users.

Authors:  Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Joseph A Istvan; Judy A Andrews; James A Henry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Pilot study to evaluate ecological momentary assessment of tinnitus.

Authors:  James A Henry; Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Garnett P McMillan; Joseph A Istvan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Ecological Momentary Assessment: Feasibility, Construct Validity, and Future Applications.

Authors:  Barbra H B Timmer; Louise Hickson; Stefan Launer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Anna Gudjonsdottir; Jacob Oleson; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.245

8.  Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Barbra H B Timmer; Louise Hickson; Stefan Launer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

9.  Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Syed Shabih Hasan; Sean DeVries; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Xuyang Zhang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Statistical Considerations for Analyzing Ecological Momentary Assessment Data.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Michelle A Jones; Erik J Jorgensen; Yu-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.674

2.  Personal Characteristics Associated with Ecological Momentary Assessment Compliance in Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates and Users.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Jacob Oleson; Kristen Caraher; Camille Dunn
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.245

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.