Literature DB >> 12833927

Case-study analysis of various field study measures.

Jill E Preminger1, David R Cunningham.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the reliability, sensitivity and validity of two types of field study measures: subjective rating techniques and self-assessment scales. Eight listeners with hearing loss served as subjects. In a laboratory study two Frequency-Gain-Characteristics (FGCs) were selected; one which subjects rated as having better speech clarity and one which subjects rated as having poorer speech clarity. The clarity ratings for the two FGCs were the criterion measure to which the results of the field studies were compared. Subjects wore each of the two FGCs in the real world for six, one-week time periods. During each week subjects completed either category ratings or paired comparisons. Two self-assessment scales were also completed. The paired comparison technique was the field study measure with the best psychometric characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12833927     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.14.1.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  7 in total

1.  Application of paired-comparison methods to hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-12

Review 2.  Statistical Considerations for Analyzing Ecological Momentary Assessment Data.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson; Michelle A Jones; Erik J Jorgensen; Yu-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Personal Characteristics Associated with Ecological Momentary Assessment Compliance in Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates and Users.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Jacob Oleson; Kristen Caraher; Camille Dunn
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.245

4.  Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Anna Gudjonsdottir; Jacob Oleson; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.245

6.  Why Ecological Momentary Assessment Surveys Go Incomplete: When It Happens and How It Impacts Data.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Jingjing Xu; Elizabeth Stangl; Shareka Pentony; Dhruv Vyas; Octav Chipara; Anna Gudjonsdottir; Jacob Oleson; Jason Galster
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 1.245

7.  Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Xuyang Zhang
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.664

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.