Background: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York City quickly became the epicenter with hospitals at full capacity needing to care for patients. At New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, we needed to develop an innovative system of how to safely discharge the massive influx of patients. Inundation of patient care with limited manpower and resources forced us to align with a third-party vendor, around-the-clock alert, to make remote patient monitoring (RPM) possible. Each patient was prescribed a pulse oximeter and nurses were assigned to monitor vital signs, speak to patients, and escalate to physicians if required. Results: We enrolled 50 patients, of whom 13 were escalated resulting in 3 emergency room visits and 1 readmission. We had a high compliance rate with high patient satisfaction in postsurveys. Discussion: Our program was unique in that it utilized telemedicine for regular patient follow-up, along with RPM through a third-party vendor. Patients were able to be safely discharged home with close follow-up through regularly obtained vitals with access to a 24/7 hotline for any emergencies, possibly preventing readmissions. Limitations include a small sample size population. Conclusions: Our experience shows that in a short period despite lack of resources, telehealth and RPM's concurrent use with a third-party vendor could be successfully utilized for safe discharges with high patient satisfaction.
Background: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York City quickly became the epicenter with hospitals at full capacity needing to care for patients. At New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, we needed to develop an innovative system of how to safely discharge the massive influx of patients. Inundation of patient care with limited manpower and resources forced us to align with a third-party vendor, around-the-clock alert, to make remote patient monitoring (RPM) possible. Each patient was prescribed a pulse oximeter and nurses were assigned to monitor vital signs, speak to patients, and escalate to physicians if required. Results: We enrolled 50 patients, of whom 13 were escalated resulting in 3 emergency room visits and 1 readmission. We had a high compliance rate with high patient satisfaction in postsurveys. Discussion: Our program was unique in that it utilized telemedicine for regular patient follow-up, along with RPM through a third-party vendor. Patients were able to be safely discharged home with close follow-up through regularly obtained vitals with access to a 24/7 hotline for any emergencies, possibly preventing readmissions. Limitations include a small sample size population. Conclusions: Our experience shows that in a short period despite lack of resources, telehealth and RPM's concurrent use with a third-party vendor could be successfully utilized for safe discharges with high patient satisfaction.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID; cardiovascular disease; home health monitoring; pandemic; telehealth; telemedicine
Authors: Roi Suárez-Gil; Emilio Casariego-Vales; Rosa Blanco-López; Fernando Santos-Guerra; Cristina Pedrosa-Fraga; Álvaro Fernández-Rial; Iria Íñiguez-Vázquez; María Mar Abad-García; Mercedes Bal-Alvaredo Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-04-10
Authors: Kathleen Gray; Wendy Chapman; Urooj R Khan; Ann Borda; Marc Budge; Martin Dutch; Graeme K Hart; Cecily Gilbert; Tafheem Ahmad Wani Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-04-06
Authors: Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Kelly E Singh; Manbinder S Sidhu; Theo Georghiou; Chris Sherlaw-Johnson; Sonila M Tomini; Matthew Inada-Kim; Karen Kirkham; Allison Streetly; Nathan Cohen; Naomi J Fulop Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-06-23
Authors: Seung Mi Oh; Singh Nair; Alexander Casler; Diana Nguyen; Juan Pablo Forero; Celina Joco; Jason Kubert; David Esses; David Adams; Sunit Jariwala; Jonathan Leff Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 4.093
Authors: Ahmed Alboksmaty; Thomas Beaney; Sarah Elkin; Jonathan M Clarke; Ara Darzi; Paul Aylin; Ana-Luísa Neves Journal: Lancet Digit Health Date: 2022-04