Literature DB >> 33319749

Using the past to estimate sensory uncertainty.

Ulrik Beierholm1, Tim Rohe2,3, Ambra Ferrari4, Oliver Stegle5,6,7, Uta Noppeney4,8.   

Abstract

To form a more reliable percept of the environment, the brain needs to estimate its own sensory uncertainty. Current theories of perceptual inference assume that the brain computes sensory uncertainty instantaneously and independently for each stimulus. We evaluated this assumption in four psychophysical experiments, in which human observers localized auditory signals that were presented synchronously with spatially disparate visual signals. Critically, the visual noise changed dynamically over time continuously or with intermittent jumps. Our results show that observers integrate audiovisual inputs weighted by sensory uncertainty estimates that combine information from past and current signals consistent with an optimal Bayesian learner that can be approximated by exponential discounting. Our results challenge leading models of perceptual inference where sensory uncertainty estimates depend only on the current stimulus. They demonstrate that the brain capitalizes on the temporal dynamics of the external world and estimates sensory uncertainty by combining past experiences with new incoming sensory signals.
© 2020, Beierholm et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference and learning; cue combination; human; multisensory integration; neuroscience; perception; sensory uncertainty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33319749      PMCID: PMC7806269          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.54172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  36 in total

Review 1.  Neural coding of uncertainty and probability.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Learned rather than online relative weighting of visual-proprioceptive sensory cues.

Authors:  Laura Mikula; Valérie Gaveau; Laure Pisella; Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Computational Precision of Mental Inference as Critical Source of Human Choice Suboptimality.

Authors:  Jan Drugowitsch; Valentin Wyart; Anne-Dominique Devauchelle; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Comparing families of dynamic causal models.

Authors:  Will D Penny; Klaas E Stephan; Jean Daunizeau; Maria J Rosa; Karl J Friston; Thomas M Schofield; Alex P Leff
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Sensory reliability shapes perceptual inference via two mechanisms.

Authors:  Tim Rohe; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  To integrate or not to integrate: Temporal dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference.

Authors:  Máté Aller; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  The neural dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception.

Authors:  Tim Rohe; Ann-Christine Ehlis; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Human online adaptation to changes in prior probability.

Authors:  Elyse H Norton; Luigi Acerbi; Wei Ji Ma; Michael S Landy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Integration of audiovisual spatial signals is not consistent with maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  David Meijer; Sebastijan Veselič; Carmelo Calafiore; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  On the origins of suboptimality in human probabilistic inference.

Authors:  Luigi Acerbi; Sethu Vijayakumar; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using the past to estimate sensory uncertainty.

Authors:  Ulrik Beierholm; Tim Rohe; Ambra Ferrari; Oliver Stegle; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  The Neurophysiological Basis of the Trial-Wise and Cumulative Ventriloquism Aftereffects.

Authors:  Hame Park; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The temporal context in bayesian models of interval timing: Recent advances and future directions.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Devin B Terhune
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.