| Literature DB >> 33319069 |
Mochammad Hatta1, Ilhamjaya Patellongi1, Rahmini Shabariyah2, Rahma Ayu Larasati Laras2, Andi Asadul Islam1, Rosdiana Natzir1, Muh Nasrum Massi1, Firdaus Hamid1, Andi Dwi Bahagia1.
Abstract
Tuberculosis infection causes a complex immunological response, where interactions between the pathogen and the host are unique, making it difficult to treat and control this disease. According to WHO, an estimated 1 million children became ill with TB, and 233,000 children died of TB in 2017. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccines continue to be the only vaccines to prevent Tuberculosis (TB). Studies suggesting the association of BCG scar with decreased childhood mortality in developing countries have rekindled the interest in BCG scar. However, the direct effect of the BCG scar remains unknown. We examined 76 cases in this study. All Subjects were diagnosed with Tuberculosis. BCG scars were examined directly when physical examination at the BCG vaccination site was performed. Tuberculin Skin Test was performed with 0.1 ml purified protein derivative (PPD) solution (5TU PPD/0.1 ml) injected intradermally. We examined the FOXP3 gene by real-time PCR and the level of Treg byELISA. The comparison of the mean Treg gene expression and the Treg protein content was higher in the positive scar group than in the negative scar group. It shows that Treg plays a role in the Tuberculosis during its active phase development. Treg protein levels were higher in the combination of positive TST and scar. It shows that BCG scarring is an essential marker of a well-functioning immune system. Cheap and straightforward initiatives like early BCG vaccinations, monitoring BCG scarring, and revaccinating scar-negative children could have an enormous immediate impact on global child survival.Entities:
Keywords: BCG Scar; FOXP3; TREG; Tuberculosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33319069 PMCID: PMC7725952 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ISSN: 2405-5794
General characteristic of subjects.
| Characteristic | N | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 36 | 47,4% |
| Male | 40 | 52,6% | |
| Age Group | 0–5 | 41 | 53,9% |
| 6–12 | 24 | 31,6% | |
| 12–18 | 11 | 14,5% | |
| Nutritional Status | Malnutrition | 44 | 57.9% |
| Normal | 32 | 42.1% | |
| Contact History | No Contact | 37 | 48,7% |
| Positive Contact | 39 | 51,3% | |
| TST | less than10 | 36 | 47,4% |
| >10 | 40 | 52.6% | |
| Scar | + | 48 | 63,2% |
| – | 28 | 36,8% |
The level of FOXP3 gene and Treg serum based on scar formation.
| Parameter | N | Mean | SD | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FoxP3 + Gene Expression | Scar – | 29 | 7,790 | 1,582 | 5,330 | 10,804 |
| Scar + | 47 | 11,681 | 1,679 | 9,191 | 14,815 | |
| level of Treg | Scar – | 29 | 216,539 | 24,443 | 178,428 | 270,407 |
| Scar + | 47 | 278,209 | 24,681 | 234,189 | 326,607 |
Fig. 1A. Comparison of FOXP3 expression B. Comparison level of T Reg based on Scar formation.
Fig. 2The Expression of FOXP3 gene and Level of Treg based on TST Result.
Fig. 3The Comparison Level of T Reg Based on Scar Formation and TST Result.
Fig. 4The Comparison Of FOXP3 Expression Based on Scar Formation and TST Result.