| Literature DB >> 30884012 |
Aldian Irma Amaruddin1,2, Sitti Wahyuni1, Firdaus Hamid3, Maisuri T Chalid4, Maria Yazdanbakhsh2, Erliyani Sartono2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors that determine the response to Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination in urban environments with respect to socioeconomic status (SES), prenatal exposure to infections or newborn's nutritional status.Entities:
Keywords: Bacille Calmette-Guérin scar; cicatrice du BCG; leptin; leptine; newborns; nouveau-nés; socioeconomic status; statut socioéconomique
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30884012 PMCID: PMC6849812 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Int Health ISSN: 1360-2276 Impact factor: 2.622
Figure 1Conceptual framework of the study. The analysis of the association between Bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG) scar size and SES through two different pathways. The analysis asked whether SES contributes to the outcome of BCG vaccination through (A) prenatal exposure to infection or (B) birth nutritional status pathway, using linear regression adjusted with gestational age and child gender for both pathways. *total IgE and anti‐Hepatitis A IgG were measured as proxy of current or previous exposure to infections. **weight‐for‐length z‐score was measured as a proxy of nutritional status at birth. #A/#B Other factors that were not assessed in pathway A or B.
Baseline characteristics of the study population of Low (low SES) and High (high SES) socioeconomic status
| Total | Low SES | High SES |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Results |
| Results |
| Results | ||
|
| |||||||
| Age, years, mean ± SD | 100 | 27.44 ± 4.90 | 50 | 26.71 ± 5.27 | 50 | 28.18 ± 4.42 | 0.135 |
| Primigravida, | 100 | 53 (53) | 50 | 30 (60) | 50 | 23 (46) | 0.229 |
| Intestinal parasites infection | |||||||
| Any helminth, | 100 | 16 (16) | 50 | 9 (18) | 50 | 7 (14) | 0.585 |
|
| 100 | 8 (8) | 50 | 6 (12) | 50 | 2 (4) | 0.140 |
|
| 100 | 9 (9) | 50 | 6 (12) | 50 | 3 (6) | 0.295 |
| Any protozoa, | 100 | 20 (20) | 50 | 17 (34) | 50 | 13 (26) | 0.517 |
|
| 100 | 3 (3) | 50 | 2 (4) | 50 | 1 (2) | 0.558 |
|
| 100 | 26 (26) | 50 | 14 (28) | 50 | 12 (24) | 0.648 |
|
| 100 | 4 (4) | 50 | 2 (4) | 50 | 2 (4) | 1.000 |
|
| 100 | 1 (2) | 50 | 1 (2) | 50 | 0 (0) | 0.315 |
| Any intestinal parasites, | 100 | 42 (42) | 50 | 23 (46) | 50 | 19 (38) | 0.418 |
| Total IgE, IU/ml, geomean (95% CI) | 100 | 180.82 (142.31–229.75) | 50 | 248.08 (175.36–350.96) | 50 | 131.80(95.94–181.06) |
|
| Leptin, ng/ml, geomean (95% CI) | 100 | 30.28 (26.40–34.73) | 50 | 29.45 (24.00–36.12) | 50 | 31.15 (25.77–37.65) | 0.687 |
| Adiponectin, μg/ml, geomean (95% CI) | 100 | 3.41 (3.00–3.87) | 50 | 3.58(3.04–4.23) | 50 | 3.25 (2.67–3.96) | 0.453 |
|
| |||||||
| Sex, female | 100 | 50 (50) | 50 | 28 (56) | 50 | 22 (44) | 0.317 |
| First born, | 100 | 52 (52) | 50 | 30 (60) | 50 | 22 (44) | 0.161 |
| Gestational age, weeks, mean ± SD | 100 | 39.71 ± 1.6 | 50 | 39.69 ± 1.68 | 50 | 39.73 ± 1.53 | 0.902 |
| Birth weight, grams, mean ± SD | 100 | 3130.5 ± 402.76 | 50 | 3194.64 ± 368.26 | 50 | 3156.67 ± 415.79 | 0.666 |
| Weight‐for‐length | 100 | −0.50 ± 0.63 | 50 | −0.47 ± 0.52 | 50 | −0.46 ± 0.65 | 0.887 |
| Total IgE, IU/ml, median (IQR) | 100 | 0.07 (0.07–0.21) | 50 | 0.12(0.07–0.76) | 50 | 0.07(0.07–0.07) |
|
| Ratio S/CO anti‐Hepatitis A Virus IgG, median (IQR) | 98 | 9.60 (7.77–10.37) | 49 | 9.93 (9.07–10.46) | 49 | 9.33 (0.30–10.28) | 0.088 |
| Anti‐Hepatitis A Virus IgG seropositivity, | 98 | 77 (78.6) | 49 | 42 (85.7) | 49 | 35 (71.4) | 0.139 |
| Anti‐ | 100 | 0.00 (0.00–41.25) | 50 | 0.00 (0.00–44.25) | 50 | 0.00 (0.00–37.00) | 0.846 |
| Anti‐ | 100 | 35 (35) | 50 | 20 (40) | 50 | 15 (30) | 0.402 |
| Leptin, ng/ml, geomean (95% CI) | 100 | 10.04 (8.30–12.14) | 50 | 9.15 (7.17–11.68) | 50 | 11.01 (8.17–14.84) | 0.336 |
| Adiponectin, μg/ml, geomean (95% CI) | 100 | 16.44 (14.35–18.83) | 50 | 17.73 (14.68–21.41) | 50 | 15.24 (12.48–18.61) | 0.271 |
Data presented as number of positives (n) of the total population (N) and as percentage of total population (%).
SD, standard deviation; IU, international unit; S/CO, signal‐to‐cut‐off.
Unadjusted.
Bold: P value < 0.05.
Figure 2The Bacille Calmette–Guérin scar size in low and high socioeconomic status infants measured at 10 months of age. Data presented as Mean ± SD. * indicates P < 0.05 (adjusted for gestational age, sex and weight‐for‐length z‐score).
Figure 3Effects of socioeconomic status on Bacille Calmette–Guérin scar size at 10 months. Model 1: crude (adjusted for gestational age, sex and birth weight‐for‐length z‐score); Model 2: Model 1 + cord total IgE. Data presented as beta estimate with 95% confidence interval. [Colour figure can be viewed at http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/]
Figure 4Pathway analysis of nutritional status at birth and Bacille Calmette–Guérin scar size at 10 months. Model 1: Crude (adjusted for gestational age, sex and SES). Model 2: Model 1 + Leptin. Model 3: Model 1 + Adiponectin. Data presented as beta estimate with 95% confidence interval. [Colour figure can be viewed at http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/]