Literature DB >> 33317126

Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China: The Case of Shanghai.

Wendong Wu1, Fang He1, Taozhi Zhuang2, Yuan Yi1.   

Abstract

Currently, many large Chinese cities have entered the postindustrial era, leaving a large amount of vacant, inefficiently utilized industrial land and buildings in the inner cities. Industrial land redevelopment (ILR) can benefit cities in multiple ways, such as by increasing urban public space, improving the quality of life of citizens, and improving the environment, and is considered an effective approach to enhance people's wellbeing. However, large-scale ILR projects often raise a series of social issues in practice, such as injustice and inequality. To address complex urban issues, ILR requires multifaceted, coordinated, and comprehensive strategies involving multitudinous stakeholders. A profound understanding of diverse stakeholders in the decision-making of ILR is a vital step in enhancing the sustainability of ILR. The aim of this paper is to use Shanghai as a case study to understand the diverse stakeholders and their participation during the decision-making of ILR in China. Interviews and questionnaires were used to collect data. Stakeholder analysis (SA) and social network analysis (SNA) were used as complementary research methodologies in this paper. First, stakeholders who participated in the decision-making of ILR were identified. Then, the characteristics of various stakeholders, including power, interests, and knowledge, were analyzed. Following this, the interactive relationships among stakeholders were explored, and their network structure was examined. Finally, policy recommendations were presented regarding stakeholder participation problems in the decision-making of ILR in China.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; decision making; industrial land redevelopment; people’s wellbeing; social network analysis; stakeholder analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33317126      PMCID: PMC7763527          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  6 in total

Review 1.  Stakeholder analysis: a review.

Authors:  R Brugha; Z Varvasovszky
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 2.  Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis.

Authors:  G Walt; L Gilson
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.344

3.  Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit.

Authors:  John M Bryson; Michael Quinn Patton; Ruth A Bowman
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2010-08-01

4.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.

Authors:  Mark S Reed; Anil Graves; Norman Dandy; Helena Posthumus; Klaus Hubacek; Joe Morris; Christina Prell; Claire H Quinn; Lindsay C Stringer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: a step towards a holistic assessment.

Authors:  Marco Caniato; Mentore Vaccari; Chettiyappan Visvanathan; Christian Zurbrügg
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.145

6.  Revitalisation of industrial buildings in Hong Kong: New measures, new constraints?

Authors:  Shi Xian; Huiwei Chen
Journal:  Habitat Int       Date:  2015-03-13
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Stakeholder Engagement Behavior(s) in Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: A Network Embeddedness Perspective.

Authors:  Hongli Lin; Yuming Zhu; Jiahe Zhou; Bingxu Mu; Caihong Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.