Literature DB >> 20674980

Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit.

John M Bryson1, Michael Quinn Patton, Ruth A Bowman.   

Abstract

In the broad field of evaluation, the importance of stakeholders is often acknowledged and different categories of stakeholders are identified. Far less frequent is careful attention to analysis of stakeholders' interests, needs, concerns, power, priorities, and perspectives and subsequent application of that knowledge to the design of evaluations. This article is meant to help readers understand and apply stakeholder identification and analysis techniques in the design of credible evaluations that enhance primary intended use by primary intended users. While presented using a utilization-focused-evaluation (UFE) lens, the techniques are not UFE-dependent. The article presents a range of the most relevant techniques to identify and analyze evaluation stakeholders. The techniques are arranged according to their ability to inform the process of developing and implementing an evaluation design and of making use of the evaluation's findings. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674980     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  14 in total

1.  Collaborative mental health services in primary care systems in Latin America: contextualized evaluation needs and opportunities.

Authors:  Jaime C Sapag; Brian Rush; Lorraine E Ferris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Enhancing national audit through addressing the quality improvement capabilities of feedback recipients: a multi-phase intervention development study.

Authors:  Michael Sykes; Elaine O'Halloran; Lucy Mahon; Jenny McSharry; Louise Allan; Richard Thomson; Tracy Finch; Niina Kolehmainen
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  A Qualitative Study to Explore Patient and Staff Perceptions of Intradialytic Exercise.

Authors:  Stephanie Thompson; Marcello Tonelli; Scott Klarenbach; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Improving treatment adherence for blood pressure lowering via mobile phone SMS-messages in South Africa: a qualitative evaluation of the SMS-text Adherence SuppoRt (StAR) trial.

Authors:  Natalie Leon; Rebecca Surender; Kirsty Bobrow; Jocelyn Muller; Andrew Farmer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  A multiple case study of intersectoral public health networks: experiences and benefits of using research.

Authors:  Anita Kothari; Charmaine McPherson; Dana Gore; Benita Cohen; Marjorie MacDonald; Shannon L Sibbald
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-02-11

Review 6.  What we have learnt (so far) about deliberative dialogue for evidence-based policymaking in West Africa.

Authors:  Valéry Ridde; Christian Dagenais
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-12-07

7.  ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment.

Authors:  Paula Adam; Pavel V Ovseiko; Jonathan Grant; Kathryn E A Graham; Omar F Boukhris; Anne-Maree Dowd; Gert V Balling; Rikke N Christensen; Alexandra Pollitt; Mark Taylor; Omar Sued; Saba Hinrichs-Krapels; Maite Solans-Domènech; Heidi Chorzempa
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-02-08

8.  Building a framework for the evaluation of knowledge translation for the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies.

Authors:  Ingrid S Sketris; Nancy Carter; Robyn L Traynor; Dorian Watts; Kim Kelly
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Case study of evaluations that go beyond clinical outcomes to assess quality improvement diabetes programmes using the Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations (DEFINE).

Authors:  Jann Paquette-Warren; Stewart B Harris; Mariam Naqshbandi Hayward; Jordan W Tompkins
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Important factors for effective patient safety governance auditing: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Saskia C van Gelderen; Marieke Zegers; Paul B Robben; Wilma Boeijen; Gert P Westert; Hub C Wollersheim
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.