Association between objectively measured walking steps and sleep in community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study.

Physical inactivity and sleep disturbances are major problems in an ageing society. There is increasing evidence that physical activity is associated with sleep quality. However, the association between daily walking steps and sleep remain unclear. This prospective study examined the relationship between objectively measured daily walking steps and sleep parameters in Japanese community-dwelling older adults. In total, 855 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 and above, with an uninterrupted follow-up from August 2015 to March 2016, were enrolled. The participants wore a wristband sensor for an average of 7.8 days every three months. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between daily walking steps and sleep parameters, including the total sleep time, sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset (WASO), awakening time count during the night, and naptime. The median (interquartile range, IQR) age of the participants was 73 (69-78) years, with 317 (37.1%) men and 538 (62.9%) women. The median (IQR) educational level was 12 (11-12) years, and the median (IQR) Mini-Mental State Examination score was 29 (27-30) points. The number of daily walking steps showed a positive correlation with sleep efficiency and an inverse correlation with WASO, awakening time count, and naptime, after adjusting for covariates and correcting for the false discovery rate (β = 0.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.034 to 0.162, p = 0.003; β = -0.107, 95% CI: -0.172 to -0.043, p = 0.001; β = -0.105, 95% CI: -0.17 to -0.04, p = 0.002; and β = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.371 to -0.249, p < 0.001, respectively). Our results can help promote walking as an intervention for preventing sleep disturbances in community-dwelling older adults.

Introduction

Sleep disturbances are a major problem in an aging society with an increasing life expectancy [1, 2]. Generally, the prevalence of sleep disorders increases with age. Up to 50% of community-dwelling older adults suffer from sleep problems, such as difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep [1]. In Japan, almost 30% of older adults claim to be affected by insomnia [3]. This inevitable change is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment, major chronic diseases, and mortality [4-6]. Therefore, maintaining sleep quality is a key determinant of the health-related quality of life of older adults. We have previously examined an association between objectively measured lifestyle factors and global cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults [7]. Random forest regression analysis showed that daily walking steps and total sleep time were associated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. We suggest that daily walking steps and total sleep time are important lifestyle factors for preventing cognitive impairment in older adults. However, the association between daily walking steps and sleep parameters has not been clarified in our previous study. A growing body of evidence has shown an association between sleep and physical function or activity [8, 9]. Poor sleep quality is associated with physical inactivity and physical disability [10, 11], whereas regular physical activity is important for improving the sleep quality [12]. These results lead us to hypothesize that daily walking steps may be associated with sleep parameters in older adults. Previous studies assessed sleep using self-report questionnaires, which tend to yield poor reliability and consistency due to recall bias or misclassification, particularly among older adults. Therefore, an objective measurement of daily walking steps and sleep parameters is required to confirm their association. Wearable sensors have previously been employed to evaluate lifestyle factors, such as physical activity and sleep, in large epidemiological studies [10, 11, 13, 14]. These sensors are considered to be noninvasive, cost-effective tools to objectively measure total daily movement and sleep, and the data collected by them are not affected by recall bias. To the best of our knowledge, a few studies have reported the relationship between objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous- intensity physical activities and sleep parameters in community-dwelling older adults [15, 16]. Few studies, however, examined the association between objectively measured daily walking steps and sleep parameters in older adults. In this study, we focused on daily walking steps because engaging in exercise programs is typically difficult for older people due to their physical limitations or health conditions. Walking is a convenient and safe activity for all age groups and accounts for most of the energy expenditure among older people. Moreover, walking enhances the physical health and reduces the risk of all-cause mortality [17, 18]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to confirm whether daily walking steps are associated with the duration or quality of sleep in community-dwelling older adults using wearable sensors.

Materials and methods

Participants

855 community-dwelling adults [317 men, 37.1%; 538 women, 62.9%; median (interquartile range, IQR) age: 73 (69–78) years, median (IQR) educational level: 12 (11–12) years] enrolled in the community-based observational study focusing on lifestyle factors related to dementia in Usuki between August 2015 and March 2016, as described elsewhere [7]. Participants were required to wear a wristband sensor for an average of 7–14 days for every measurement period. Moreover, measurement of the lifestyle factors was repeated every three months for one year (i.e., four times per year; total study duration: 56 days) to eliminate measurement errors due to seasonal differences in lifestyle [19]. Briefly, the inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age ≥ 65 years, (2) residents of Usuki, (3) physically and psychologically healthy individuals, (4) absence of dementia, and (5) ability to independently perform the activities of daily living. The exclusion criteria included a history of other neurological and psychiatric disorders (including Parkinson’s disease or epilepsy), severe head trauma, alcoholism, severe cardiac failure, severe hepatic or renal dysfunction, patients undergoing treatment for cancer, and individuals experiencing walking difficulties as a result of a stroke. All participants underwent a physical examination, a cognitive function evaluation using MMSE, and a medical interview at baseline. Height and weight were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m2). Data pertaining to demographic characteristics (including age, sex, and education level), vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia, smoking status, history of alcohol consumption, diagnosis of dementia, and medication history were collected at baseline via interviews conducted by trained medical staff. History of a chronic disease was defined as a prior diagnosis of stroke, cardiac disease, hepatic or renal disease, or cancer. Assessments of vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia were based on a detailed clinical and medication (antihypertensive, antidiabetic, or hypocholesterolemic medication) history. Moreover, information pertaining to a diagnosis of dementia or the administration of medication for dementia was collected from the local hospital. Information related to decreases in the activities of daily living as a result of a cognitive impairment was obtained from the participants and their closest relatives via face-to-face clinical interviews. This prospective study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Oita University Hospital (UMIN000017442). Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects to participate in the study.

Wearable-sensor data

All participants were asked to wear a wristband sensor (Silmee™ W20; TDK Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) on their wrist day and night, except while bathing. These wearable sensors were used to measure various lifestyle parameters, including walking steps, as well as various sleep parameters. These parameters were calculated by gathering the sensor data for each day and averaging it over the entire measurement period. The number of daily walking steps was calculated by averaging the total number of steps per day. Sleep parameters include total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, time awake after sleep onset (WASO), awakening time count, and naptime. TST, sleep efficiency, WASO, and awakening time count were measured from 18:00 to 05:59 on the subsequent morning. The start point was defined as the clock time associated with the beginning of the first 20 min block of sleep without movement. TST was defined as the average total number of minutes slept per day. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the percentage of TST over the time spent in bed. Nocturnal awakening was defined as 20 min of continuous movement from sleep onset to the end of sleep. WASO and awakening time count were calculated by averaging the total number of minutes awake after sleep onset and the frequency of awakening per day, respectively. Naptime was defined as rest without movement recorded on the wearable sensor from 06:00 to 17:59 on the same evening. We verified the measurement accuracy of the walking steps and sleep duration by comparing the sensor data with video observation data in healthy older participants [7]. Data are presented as “mean (standard deviation, SD)” or as “median (IQR).”

Statistical analysis

Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between the number of daily walking steps and different sleep parameters, such as TST, WASO, sleep efficiency, awakening time count, and naptime, after adjusting for covariates (including age, sex, educational level, BMI, vascular risk factors, alcohol consumption, and smoking status), and p-values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. The resulting p-values were corrected according to the false discovery rate. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Demographic characteristics of the study population and wristband sensor data

The median (IQR) BMI was 23.0 (21.1–25.1) kg/m2 and the median (IQR) MMSE score was 29 points (27–30 points). Ever smoker was 4.2% and ever drinker was 41.4%. 429 subjects (50.2%) had a history of hypertension, 114 (13.3%) had a history of diabetes mellitus, and 281 (32.9%) had a history of hypercholesterolemia. The mean (SD) duration for which lifestyle data were collected using the wristband sensor was 31.3 days (7.1 days) per year (7.8 days on average every three months). The median (IQR) number of daily walking steps was 5,115.7 (3,395.3–7,061.4), the mean (SD) TST was 408.4 min (69.1 min), the median (IQR) WASO was 19.6 min (11.6–30.3 min), the median (IQR) sleep efficiency was 95.5% (93.1%–97.1%), the median (IQR) awakening time count was 0.46 counts (0.29–0.69 counts), and the median (IQR) naptime was 37.9 min (21.5–64.9 min). The daily walking steps and sleep parameters in our cohort were similar to those found in previous studies on Japanese adults at a comparable age [20, 21].

Multiple linear regression analyses

Table 1 summarizes the results of the multiple linear regression analyses, showing the association between the number of daily walking steps and various sleep parameters. Daily walking steps showed a positive correlation with sleep efficiency (Fig 1A) and an inverse correlation with WASO (Fig 1B), awakening time count (Fig 1C), and naptime (Fig 1D) after adjusting for covariates and correction for the false discovery rate (β = 0.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.034 to 0.162, p = 0.003; β = −0.107, 95% CI: −0.172 to −0.043, p = 0.001; β = −0.105, 95% CI: −0.17 to −0.04, p = 0.002; and β = −0.31, 95% CI: −0.371 to −0.249, p < 0.001, respectively). However, the correlation between the number of daily walking steps and TST was attenuated to a nonsignificant trend after adjusting for covariates (β = −0.001, 95% CI: −0.066 to 0.065, p = 0.99).

Table 1

Multiple regression model showing the association between the daily walking steps and sleep parameters.

	Walking steps
	β (95% CI)	p-value
TST	−0.001 (−0.066, 0.065)	0.99
Sleep efficiency	0.098 (0.034, 0.162)	0.003*
WASO	−0.107 (−0.172, −0.043)	0.001*
Awakening time count	−0.105 (−0.17, −0.04)	0.002*
Naptime	−0.31 (−0.371, −0.249)	<0.001*

TST, total sleep time; WASO, time awake after sleep onset; CI, confidence interval.

*p < 0.05.

Fig 1

Association between daily walking steps and sleep parameters.

Daily walking steps showed a positive correlation with sleep efficiency (A) and an inverse correlation with WASO (B), awakening time count (C), and naptime (D). WASO, time awake after sleep onset.

Discussion

We herein examined the association between daily walking steps and sleep parameters in community-dwelling older adults. Several studies have examined the association between moderate-to-vigorous- intensity physical activities and sleep parameters using self-report questionnaires. We have previously examined an association between lifestyle factors and global cognitive function and suggested that daily walking steps and total sleep time were important for preventing cognitive impairment [7]. However, the association between daily walking steps and sleep parameters has not examined in this cohort. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study clarifying the association between objectively measured daily walking steps and sleep parameters in older adults using a wearable sensor. The present study provided novel and interesting insights for devising public health strategies to improve the quality of sleep. Daily walking steps showed a positive correlation with sleep efficiency and an inverse correlation with WASO, awakening time count, and naptime after adjusting for covariates and correcting for the false discovery rate. This result indicates an association between the walking steps and sleep quality of older adults. This study has several strengths; this was a large-scale study of community-dwelling older adults, and it included objective measurements of daily walking steps and sleep parameters.

The most interesting finding in this study was that the increase in the daily walking steps was associated with greater sleep efficiency, lower frequency of awakening after sleep onset, and shorter WASO and naptime. Several studies have examined the association between physical function or activity and sleep parameters in older adults [10, 11, 14, 15, 22–26]. Despite the varied study designs and methods used for sleep assessment, previous studies have revealed a robust association between physical function or activity and sleep parameters. For example, cross-sectional studies employing self-reported questionnaires showed an association among long sleep duration, poor sleep quality, and decreased physical function [2, 15, 22–25], whereas other studies employing actigraphy showed an association among short or long sleep duration, poor sleep quality, and decreased physical function [10, 11]. A longitudinal study employing self-reported measures showed an association between long sleep duration and decreased physical function [26], and another study employing actigraphy showed an association between poor sleep quality (characterized by greater WASO and lower sleep efficiency) and decreased physical function [14]. However, the present study differs from previous studies in that it included an objective measurement of both physical activity and sleep parameters using a wearable sensor, which eliminated the risk of recall bias or misclassification. Only one study reported the temporal and bidirectional association between objectively measured sleep parameters and physical activity indices in older adults [15]. This previous study, however, included a small number of healthy women (n = 143, mean age: 73 years) and assessed a moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity. In contrast, we measured daily walking in a large number of older adults. Walking is a convenient and safe activity for older adults. Moreover, interventional studies have shown that walking is better than vigorous physical activity with respect to achieving a good sleep quality [27-29]. Therefore, we suggest that increased daily walking steps may be associated with a good sleep quality. Although the mechanism underlying the association between physical activity and sleep is not well understood, physical activity can reduce systemic inflammation and improve body composition or psychological well-being [30].

Our results showed no significant correlation between daily walking steps and sleep duration. Previous studies employing actigraphy have shown contradictory results regarding association physical function and sleep duration [10, 14]. One study showed the association between decreased physical function and short or long sleep duration [10], whereas the other study showed no significant association between physical function and sleep duration [14]. Although it remains unclear whether daily walking steps is more closely associated with sleep quality compared to sleep duration, a previous interventional study reported that walking could improve sleep quality rather than sleep duration [29].

Some limitations in our study should be considered while interpreting the results. First, the cross-sectional design of the study does not permit any causal inferences. Second, we did not assess other type of physical activity, including moderate- or vigorous- intensity physical activity. Further studies are needed to determine which type of physical activity is associated with sleep quality or duration. Third, we collated clinical data to define the presence or absence of dementia; however, patients with possible dementia may not have been completely excluded from the study. Although all participants were decided to be physically and psychologically healthy by physical examination medical interview at baseline, the participants with chronic disease could not be excluded completely from participating in the current study.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating an association between objectively measured daily walking steps and sleep quality. Increased daily walking steps are associated with greater sleep efficiency, lower frequency of awakening time count, and shorter WASO and naptime. The current results may contribute to the development of new evidence-based interventions for improving sleep quality in community-dwelling older adults.

21 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-10392

Association between objectively measured walking steps and sleep in community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kimura,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses all the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 05 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Gianluigi Forloni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3.  Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Usuki city employees for their efforts in recruiting

238 participants. We thank the TDK Corporation for the development of the wearable sensor, Suzuki

239 Co. Ltd. for their assistance with data collection, and HCL Technologies, Confidential, and Fusa

240 Matsuzaki for database construction and data analysis. We received generous assistance from

241 Kaori Hirano, Megumi Ogata, Mai Kishigami, and Oita University students with the physical

242 measurement and interview procedures."

i) We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

ii) Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

" This research was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [Grant Number 18he1402003]. The founders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.".

iii) Additionally, because some of your funding information pertains to commercial funding we ask you to provide an updated Competing Interests statement, declaring all sources of commercial funding.

iv) In your Competing Interests statement, please confirm that your commercial funding does not alter your adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” as detailed online in our guide for authors  http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests.  If this statement is not true and your adherence to PLOS policies on sharing data and materials is altered, please explain how.

* Please include the updated Competing Interests Statement and Funding Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Abstract:

The introduction in the abstract makes the reader think that only steps from walking around the house and from fidgeting will be taken into consideration for this study. Since this is not the case, this should be removed.

Introduction:

Page 4, line 63- the authors mention that only one study has assessed the relationship between MVPA and sleep parameters, however, there have been other studies conducted on the subject matter -Gabriel, Kelley Pettee, et al. "Bidirectional associations of accelerometer-determined sedentary behavior and physical activity with reported time in bed: Women's Health Study." Sleep health 3.1 (2017): 49-55.

The authors state that they will focus on daily walking steps since it is a measure of low-intensity activity-is there a citation for this? How are the authors able to discern whether steps taken belonged in the light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity category? The authors may consider not talking about intensity since it is not reporting OR they may consider reporting time spent in light, moderate and vigorous intensity.

Methods:

Page 5, Line 83- how did the authors ensure “physical and psychological health”? What if they had a chronic disease?

Discussion: Page 10, line 191, citation missing for “several studies” which ones?

There are several grammatical errors throughout the manuscript.

Keywords: Community is misspelled

Page 3, line 54- Remove “almost”

Page 9, line 179, nor should be “not”

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

5 Nov 2020

We would like to take this opportunity to express our sincere thanks to the reviewer who identified areas of the manuscript that needed corrections or modification. Based on the instructions provided in the decision letter and comments provided by the reviewers, we have revised the manuscript by modifying the relevant sections in the manuscript. Also appended below are point-by-point responses to the comments raised by the reviewers. We hope that our revisions along with our responses address reviewer’s concerns and that our revised manuscript is now suitable for publication in PLOS ONE.

Reviewer 1

We thank Reviewer #1 for the critical comments and useful suggestions, which have substantially helped us improve our manuscript. As indicated in our responses below, we have considered each reviewer comment and suggestion and have revised the manuscript accordingly. We hope that our responses and revisions are appropriate and that our revised manuscript is considered for publication.

1. “Reviewer’s comment”

Abstract: The introduction in the abstract makes the reader think that only steps from walking around the house and from fidgeting will be taken into consideration for this study. Since this is not the case, this should be removed.

“Author’s response”

We agreed with reviewer’s comment. We have removed this sentence and added the sentence in the Abstract section, as follows:

P 2, line 15- 16

There is increasing evidence that physical activity is associated with sleep quality.

2. “Reviewer’s comment”

Introduction: Page 4, line 63- the authors mention that only one study has assessed the relationship between MVPA and sleep parameters, however, there have been other studies conducted on the subject matter -Gabriel, Kelley Pettee, et al. "Bidirectional associations of accelerometer-determined sedentary behavior and physical activity with reported time in bed: Women's Health Study." Sleep health 3.1 (2017): 49-55.

“Author’s response”

We agreed with reviewer’s comment. We have revised the relevant sentences in the Methods section, as follows:

P 4, line 60- 63

To the best of our knowledge, a few studies have reported the relationship between objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous- intensity physical activities and sleep parameters in community-dwelling older adults [15, 16].

3. “Reviewer’s comment”

The authors state that they will focus on daily walking steps since it is a measure of low-intensity activity-is there a citation for this? How are the authors able to discern whether steps taken belonged in the light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity category? The authors may consider not talking about intensity since it is not reporting OR they may consider reporting time spent in light, moderate and vigorous intensity.

“Author’s response”

Several previous studies reported that walking may be categorized into light-intensity physical activity, as follows:

“Whether the association includes low-intensity activity such as regular walking is not known.” Abbott RD, et al. JAMA. 2004;292:1447-1453.

“Women may　spend more time doing low and lifestyle intensity activities,　such as walking, household chores, and gardening.”　Lohne-Seiler et al. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:284.

“Recent studies have　shown that light-intensity PA (LPA; e.g., housework, gardening,　and casual walking) and sedentary behavior (SB;e.g., television viewing, computer use, workplace sitting,　and sitting in automobile) are also related to health of older　adults.”　Yasunaga A, et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2018;16:240.

“These activities can include non-exercise leisure-time and life-style activities (e.g.　walking, gardening, etc.) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (e.g. shopping, housework, etc.), which are typically in the low-intensity range. Research using self-report measures of walking activity indicates that these non-exercise physical activities may be associated with cognitive health benefits.” Varma VR, et al. Hippocampus. 2015; 25: 605–615.

Therefore, we classified walking steps into light-intensity activity. However, we agreed with reviewer’s comment that walking steps include the light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity. Moreover, in the present study, we have not investigated the intensity of physical activity. Therefore, we have revised the relevant sentences in the Introduction and Discussion sections, as follows:

P 4, line 64- 68

In this study, we focused on daily walking steps because engaging in exercise programs is typically difficult for older people because of their physical limitations or health conditions. Walking is a convenient and safe activity for all age groups and accounts for most of the energy expenditure among older people.

P 11, line 208- 209

In contrast, we measured daily walking in a large number of older adults.

4. “Reviewer’s comment”

Methods:

Page 5, Line 83- how did the authors ensure “physical and psychological health”? What if they had a chronic disease?

“Author’s response”

We agreed with reviewer’s comment. We have added the relevant sentences in the Discussion section, as follows:

P 11, line 229- P 12, line 231

Although all participants were decided to be physically and psychologically healthy by physical examination medical interview at baseline, the participants with chronic disease could not be excluded completely from participating in the current study.

5. “Reviewer’s comment”

Discussion: Page 10, line 191, citation missing for “several studies” which ones?

“Author’s response”

We agreed with reviewer’s comment. We have revised the relevant sentences in the Discussion section, as follows:

P 10, line 192

Several studies have examined the association between physical function or activity and sleep parameters in older adults [10, 11, 14, 15, 22–26].

6. “Reviewer’s comment”

There are several grammatical errors throughout the manuscript.

Keywords: Community is misspelled

Page 3, line 54- Remove “almost”

Page 9, line 179, nor should be “not”Discussion:

“Author’s response”

We agreed with reviewer’s comment. We have corrected grammatical errors throughout the manuscript.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

1 Dec 2020

Association between objectively measured walking steps and sleep in community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study

PONE-D-20-10392R1

Dear Dr. Kimura,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Gianluigi Forloni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

4 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-10392R1

Association between objectively measured walking steps and sleep in community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study

Dear Dr. Kimura:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Gianluigi Forloni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE