Literature DB >> 33314798

Conditional survival in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer after receiving various treatment modalities.

Wei Deng1, Zhao Yang2, Xin Dong1, Rong Yu1, Weihu Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To estimate the adjusted conditional overall survival (COS) in patients with esophageal cancer after receiving various treatment modalities via a national population-based database, and to investigate the possible time-dependent effects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate conventional survival time. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to estimate the adjusted COS in patients receiving different treatment modalities. Landmark analysis was employed to investigate the possible time-dependent effects of different treatment modalities in patients who had survived a certain period of time.
RESULTS: A total of 25,232 patients were included in the final analysis. The conventional 5-year overall survival was 19.3%. The 5-year adjusted COS increased most for the first 3 years, and increased slightly afterwards. In patients with regional esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer, stage-specific analysis showed that surgery only and preoperative radiation therapy benefited most for patients with localized disease, preoperative radiation therapy plus surgery benefited regional, and preoperative radiation therapy plus surgery benefited distant disease, with the 5-year adjusted COS given patients had survived 3 years being 67.0% (95% CI 65.2%-68.7%), 59.9% (95% CI 58.3%-61.5%), 58.4% (95% CI 56.3%-60.5%), and 61.8% (95% CI 59.5%-64.1%), respectively. In time-dependent analysis, the benefits of surgery only in localized cases were prominent within 48 months after diagnosis. Preoperative radiation therapy showed long-lasting benefits in patients with regional disease. In patients with distant disease, all treatment modalities showed similar and short-term effects.
CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted COS in patients with esophageal cancer increased as time accrued after receiving various treatment modalities. The time-dependent effects in specific tumor stage provided a dynamic view on optimization of treatment strategies.
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER database; adjusted conditional survival; esophageal cancer; multimodality therapy; time-dependent effect

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33314798      PMCID: PMC7877350          DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Med        ISSN: 2045-7634            Impact factor:   4.452


  44 in total

Review 1.  Landmark analysis at the 25-year landmark point.

Authors:  Urania Dafni
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-05

Review 2.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time.

Authors:  M Schemper; T L Smith
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-08

4.  The conditional probability of survival of patients with primary malignant brain tumors: surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data.

Authors:  F G Davis; B J McCarthy; S Freels; V Kupelian; M L Bondy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Impact of postoperative radiation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  David Schreiber; Justin Rineer; Dan Vongtama; Angela Wortham; Peter Han; David Schwartz; Kwang Choi; Marvin Rotman
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  The Impact of Adjuvant Postoperative Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy on Survival After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew T Wong; Meng Shao; Justin Rineer; Anna Lee; David Schwartz; David Schreiber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Survival prediction tools for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Vaibhav Gupta; Natalie Coburn; Biniam Kidane; Kenneth R Hess; Carolyn Compton; Jolie Ringash; Gail Darling; Alyson L Mahar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Pattern of recurrence following complete resection of esophageal carcinoma and factors predictive of recurrent disease.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Jean-Michel Balon; Guillaune Piessen; Sylvain Fabre; Isabelle Van Seuningen; Jean-Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pieter C van der Sluis; Sylvia van der Horst; Anne M May; Carlo Schippers; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Hans C A Joore; Christiaan C Kroese; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Stella Mook; Frank P Vleggaar; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims.

Authors:  Anne-Michelle Noone; Jennifer L Lund; Angela Mariotto; Kathleen Cronin; Timothy McNeel; Dennis Deapen; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.178

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prognostic variables for conditional survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Mingqiang Liang; Jiazhou Xiao; Maohui Chen; Bin Zheng; Chun Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 4.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.