Jeremy G Stewart1, Lillian Polanco-Roman2,3, Cristiane S Duarte2,3, Randy P Auerbach2,3,4. 1. Department of Psychology and Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. 3. New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA. 4. Division of Clinical Developmental Neuroscience, Sackler Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Identifying risk factors for STBs during adolescence is essential for suicide prevention. In this review, we employ the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to synthesize studies on key neurocognitive processes-cognitive control, reward responsiveness/valuation, and negative urgency-relevant to adolescent STBs. RECENT FINDINGS: Within subdomains of Cognitive Control, studies of inhibition/suppression and updating/maintenance were mixed, while response selection (i.e., decision-making) deficits were consistently associated with suicide attempts. Fewer studies, by comparison, have probed the Positive Valence Systems. Relative to healthy controls, adolescents with prior STBs may show a blunted neural response to rewards and value rewards less, but findings require replication. Finally, negative urgency, which may span subdomains within both Cognitive Control and the Positive Valence Systems, was associated with recent suicide attempts in the only study to directly test this association. SUMMARY: Few studies have examined neurocognitive functioning in relation to adolescent STBs, despite the relevance of this research to detecting suicide risk. We recommend that future studies incorporate developmental contexts relevant to both neurocognitive processes and STBs.Broadly, cognitive control is associated with activation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and its interaction with other brain areas (e.g., reward and motor regions) [32]. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies using emotional stimuli have provided evidence of abnormalities in neural regions supporting cognitive control among youth with STBs. [33] computed neural activation corresponding to viewing angry faces (relative to a fixation cross) in a sample of depressed youth. They found that, relative to non-attempters, attempters had: (a) increased activation in the right anterior gyrus and dorsolateral PFC and (b) reduced functional connectivity between the anterior cingulate gyrus and bilateral insulae. Relatedly, youth with bipolar disorder and a history of suicide attempts showed reduced functional connectivity between the amygdala and the left ventral PFC while viewing emotional (happy, fearful) and neutral faces compared to patient non-attempters [34]. The findings indicate that attempters may have problems regulating and appropriately deploying attention, as well as planning and executing behavioral responses, in emotional contexts.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Identifying risk factors for STBs during adolescence is essential for suicide prevention. In this review, we employ the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework to synthesize studies on key neurocognitive processes-cognitive control, reward responsiveness/valuation, and negative urgency-relevant to adolescent STBs. RECENT FINDINGS: Within subdomains of Cognitive Control, studies of inhibition/suppression and updating/maintenance were mixed, while response selection (i.e., decision-making) deficits were consistently associated with suicide attempts. Fewer studies, by comparison, have probed the Positive Valence Systems. Relative to healthy controls, adolescents with prior STBs may show a blunted neural response to rewards and value rewards less, but findings require replication. Finally, negative urgency, which may span subdomains within both Cognitive Control and the Positive Valence Systems, was associated with recent suicide attempts in the only study to directly test this association. SUMMARY: Few studies have examined neurocognitive functioning in relation to adolescent STBs, despite the relevance of this research to detecting suicide risk. We recommend that future studies incorporate developmental contexts relevant to both neurocognitive processes and STBs.Broadly, cognitive control is associated with activation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and its interaction with other brain areas (e.g., reward and motor regions) [32]. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies using emotional stimuli have provided evidence of abnormalities in neural regions supporting cognitive control among youth with STBs. [33] computed neural activation corresponding to viewing angry faces (relative to a fixation cross) in a sample of depressed youth. They found that, relative to non-attempters, attempters had: (a) increased activation in the right anterior gyrus and dorsolateral PFC and (b) reduced functional connectivity between the anterior cingulate gyrus and bilateral insulae. Relatedly, youth with bipolar disorder and a history of suicide attempts showed reduced functional connectivity between the amygdala and the left ventral PFC while viewing emotional (happy, fearful) and neutral faces compared to patient non-attempters [34]. The findings indicate that attempters may have problems regulating and appropriately deploying attention, as well as planning and executing behavioral responses, in emotional contexts.
Authors: Jeremy G Stewart; Catherine R Glenn; Erika C Esposito; Christine B Cha; Matthew K Nock; Randy P Auerbach Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Arielle H Sheftall; Dustin J Davidson; Sandy M McBee-Strayer; John Ackerman; Kristen Mendoza; Brady Reynolds; Jeffrey A Bridge Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Matthew K Nock; Jennifer Greif Green; Irving Hwang; Katie A McLaughlin; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronald C Kessler Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Heather A MacPherson; Kerri L Kim; Karen E Seymour; Jennifer Wolff; Christianne Esposito-Smythers; Anthony Spirito; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol Date: 2022-06-25
Authors: Randy P Auerbach; David Pagliaccio; Grace O Allison; Kira L Alqueza; Maria Fernanda Alonso Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Gareth Harman; Dakota Kliamovich; Angelica M Morales; Sydney Gilbert; Deanna M Barch; Michael A Mooney; Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Damien A Fair; Bonnie J Nagel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240