Literature DB >> 33312634

"Bacterial consortium from hydrothermal vent sediments presents electrogenic activity achieved under sulfate reducing conditions in a microbial fuel cell".

Margarita Isabel Pérez-Díaz1, Paola Zárate-Segura2, Luis Antonio Bermeo-Fernández1, Khemlal Nirmalkar3, Fernando Bastida-González2, Jaime García-Mena3, Janet Jan-Roblero4, Claudia Guerrero-Barajas1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present work was to assess the electrogenic activity of bacteria from hydrothermal vent sediments achieved under sulfate reducing (SR) conditions in a microbial fuel cell design with acetate, propionate and butyrate as electron donors.
METHODS: Two different mixtures of volatile fatty acids (VFA) were evaluated as the carbon source at two chemical oxygen demand (COD) proportions. The mixtures of VFA used were: acetate, propionate and butyrate COD: 3:0.5:0.5 (stage 1) and acetate - butyrate COD: 3.5:0.5 (stage 2). Periodical analysis of sulfate (SO4 -2), sulfide (HS-) and COD were conducted to assess sulfate reduction (SR) and COD removal along with measurements of voltage and current to assess the global performance of the consortium in the system.
RESULTS: Percentage of SR was of 97.5 ± 0.7 and 74.3 ± 1.5% for stage 1 and 2, respectively. The % COD removal was of 91 ± 2.1 and 75.3 ± 9.6 for stage 1 and 2, respectively. Although SR and COD removal were higher at stage 1, in regards of energy, stage 2 presented higher current and power densities and Coulombic efficiency as follows: 741.7 ± 30.5 μA/m2, 376 ± 34.4 μW/m2 and 5 ± 2.7%, whereas for stage 1 these values were: 419 ± 71 μA/m2, 52.7 ± 18 μW/m2 and 0.02%, respectively. A metagenomic analysis - stage 2 - in the anodic chamber, demonstrated that SR was due to Dethiosulfovibrionaceae (HA73), Desulfobacter and Desulfococcus and the electrogenic microorganisms were Planococcus, SHD-231, Proteiniclasticum, vadinCA02, and families Porphyromonadacea and Pseudomonadaceae.
CONCLUSIONS: It was demonstrated that microorganisms prevenient from hydrothermal vent sediments adapted to a microbial fuel cell system are able to generate electricity coupled to 74.3 ± 1.5 and 75.3 ± 9.6% of SR and COD removal respectively, with a mixture of acetate - butyrate. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrogenic microorganisms; Hydrothermal vent sediments; Microbial fuel cell; Sulfate reduction; UASB reactors

Year:  2020        PMID: 33312634      PMCID: PMC7721773          DOI: 10.1007/s40201-020-00537-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng


  35 in total

1.  Microbial community structures and in situ sulfate-reducing and sulfur-oxidizing activities in biofilms developed on mortar specimens in a corroded sewer system.

Authors:  Hisashi Satoh; Mitsunori Odagiri; Tsukasa Ito; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Effects of sulphate addition and sulphide inhibition on microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  I Ieropoulos; A Gálvez; J Greenman
Journal:  Enzyme Microb Technol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.493

3.  Simultaneous sulfide removal and electricity generation with corn stover biomass as co-substrate in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Baogang Zhang; Caixing Tian; Zhengfang Ye; Ye Liu; Zhongfang Lei; Wenli Huang; Chuanping Feng
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  Addition of acetate improves stability of power generation using microbial fuel cells treating domestic wastewater.

Authors:  Jennifer L Stager; Xiaoyuan Zhang; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.373

5.  High sulfate reduction efficiency in a UASB using an alternative source of sulfidogenic sludge derived from hydrothermal vent sediments.

Authors:  Selene Montserrat García-Solares; Alberto Ordaz; Oscar Monroy-Hermosillo; Janet Jan-Roblero; Claudia Guerrero-Barajas
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.926

Review 6.  Microbial sulphate reduction at a low pH.

Authors:  Matthias Koschorreck
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 7.  The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria.

Authors:  Gerard Muyzer; Alfons J M Stams
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Power generation and pollutants removal from landfill leachate in microbial fuel cell: Variation and influence of anodic microbiomes.

Authors:  Muhammad Hassan; Huawei Wei; Huijing Qiu; Yinglong Su; Syed Wajahat H Jaafry; Lu Zhan; Bing Xie
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 9.642

9.  Gut Microbiota and Endothelial Dysfunction Markers in Obese Mexican Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Khemlal Nirmalkar; Selvasankar Murugesan; María Luisa Pizano-Zárate; Loan Edel Villalobos-Flores; Cristina García-González; Rosa María Morales-Hernández; Jorge Arturo Nuñez-Hernández; Fernando Hernández-Quiroz; María Del Socorro Romero-Figueroa; César Hernández-Guerrero; Carlos Hoyo-Vadillo; Jaime García-Mena
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data.

Authors:  Anthony M Bolger; Marc Lohse; Bjoern Usadel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Potential of Sewage Sludge Mycobiome to Degrade High Diclofenac and Bisphenol-A Concentrations.

Authors:  Ulises Conejo-Saucedo; Alejandro Ledezma-Villanueva; Gabriela Ángeles de Paz; Mario Herrero-Cervera; Concepción Calvo; Elisabet Aranda
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-05-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.