Literature DB >> 33312598

Tehran environmental and neurodevelopmental disorders (TEND) cohort study: Phase I, feasibility assessment.

Mansour Shamsipour1, Reihaneh Pirjani2, Maryam Zare Jeddi3, Mohammad Effatpanah4, Noushin Rastkari5, Homa Kashani1, Mahboobeh Shirazi6, Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand5, Mamak Shariat7, Fatemeh Sadat Javadi8, Ghazal Shariatpanahi9, Gholamreza Hassanpour10, Zahra Peykarporsan11, Akram Jamal11, Mina Ebad Ardestani1, Fatemeh Sadat Hoseini12, Hosein Dalili13, Fatemeh Sadat Nayeri7, Alireza Mesdaghinia14, Kazem Naddafi5,11, Seyed Jamaleddin Shahtaheri15, Simin Nasseri11,14, Farzad Yunesian16, Golnaz Rezaeizadeh7, Heresh Amini17,18, Kazuhito Yokoyama19, Mohsen Vigeh7,19, Masud Yunesian1,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To advance knowledge about childhood neurodevelopmental disorders and study their environmental determinants, we conducted a study in Tehran, Iran to assess the feasibility of prospective birth cohort study.
METHODS: We evaluated participation of pregnant women, feasibility of sampling biological material, and health care services availability in Tehran in four steps: (1) first trimester of pregnancy; (2) third trimester of pregnancy; (3) at delivery; and (4) two to three months after delivery. We collected related data through questionnaires, also various biological samples were obtained from mothers (blood, urine, milk and nails-hands and feet) and newborns (umbilical cord blood, meconium, and urine samples) from February 2016 to October 2017.
RESULTS: overall 838 eligible pregnant women were approached. The participation rate was 206(25%) in our study and about 185(90%) of subjects were recruited in hospitals. Out of 206 participants in the first trimester, blood, urine, hand nail, and foot nail samples were collected from 206(100%),193(93%), 205(99%), and 205(99%), respectively. These values dropped to 65(54%), 83(69%), 84(70%), and 84(70%) for the remaining participants 120(58%) in the third trimester, respectively. Also, we gathered milk samples from 125(60%) of mothers at two to three months after delivery.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that hospitals were better places for recruitment of subjects in a birth cohort in Tehran. We further concluded that birth cohort study recruitment can be improved by choosing appropriate gestational ages. Obtaining the newborn's urine, meconium, and umbilical cord blood were challenging procedures and require good collaboration between hospital staff and researchers. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Birth cohort study; Environmental chemicals; Iran

Year:  2020        PMID: 33312598      PMCID: PMC7721759          DOI: 10.1007/s40201-020-00499-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng


  28 in total

1.  Survey of Neonates in Pomerania (SNiP): a population-based birth study--objectives, design and population coverage.

Authors:  Arno Ebner; Jochen R Thyrian; Anja Lange; Marie-Luise Lingnau; Meike Scheler-Hofmann; Dieter Rosskopf; Marek Zygmunt; Johannes-Peter Haas; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Christoph Fusch
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 2.  Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Christopher Paul Wild
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Why carry out a longitudinal birth survey?

Authors:  Jean Golding; Richard Jones; Marie-Noël Bruné; Jenny Pronczuk
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  The Canadian healthy infant longitudinal development birth cohort study: biological samples and biobanking.

Authors:  T J Moraes; D L Lefebvre; R Chooniedass; A B Becker; J R Brook; J Denburg; K T HayGlass; R G Hegele; T R Kollmann; J Macri; P J Mandhane; J A Scott; P Subbarao; T K Takaro; S E Turvey; J D Duncan; M R Sears; A D Befus
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  A Pilot Study of the ELFE Longitudinal Cohort: Feasibility and Preliminary Evaluation of Biological Collection.

Authors:  Amivi Oleko; Fotini Betsou; Hélène Sarter; Claire Gerdil; Isabelle Desbois; Marie Aline Charles; Henri Leridon; Stéphanie Vandentorren
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  The Danish National Birth Cohort--its background, structure and aim.

Authors:  J Olsen; M Melbye; S F Olsen; T I Sørensen; P Aaby; A M Andersen; D Taxbøl; K D Hansen; M Juhl; T B Schow; H T Sørensen; J Andresen; E L Mortensen; A W Olesen; C Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  The National Children's Study: a 21-year prospective study of 100,000 American children.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Leonardo Trasande; Lorna E Thorpe; Charon Gwynn; Paul J Lioy; Mary E D'Alton; Heather S Lipkind; James Swanson; Pathik D Wadhwa; Edward B Clark; Virginia A Rauh; Frederica P Perera; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort.

Authors:  Lorenzo Richiardi; Iacopo Baussano; Loredana Vizzini; Jeroen Douwes; Neil Pearce; Franco Merletti
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Cord blood lipid profile and associated factors: baseline data of a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Roya Kelishadi; Zohreh Badiee; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 10.  European birth cohorts for environmental health research.

Authors:  Martine Vrijheid; Maribel Casas; Anna Bergström; Amanda Carmichael; Sylvaine Cordier; Merete Eggesbø; Esben Eller; Maria P Fantini; Mariana F Fernández; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Ulrike Gehring; Regina Grazuleviciene; Cynthia Hohmann; Anne M Karvonen; Thomas Keil; Manolis Kogevinas; Gudrun Koppen; Ursula Krämer; Claudia E Kuehni; Per Magnus; Renata Majewska; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Evridiki Patelarou; Maria Skaalum Petersen; Frank H Pierik; Kinga Polanska; Daniela Porta; Lorenzo Richiardi; Ana Cristina Santos; Rémy Slama; Radim J Sram; Carel Thijs; Christina Tischer; Gunnar Toft; Tomáš Trnovec; Stephanie Vandentorren; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Michael Wilhelm; John Wright; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.