Literature DB >> 33310812

Perceptions and experiences of the public regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal: a qualitative study using phenomenological analysis.

Navin Bhatt1, Bandana Bhatt2, Soniya Gurung3, Suresh Dahal4, Amrit Raj Jaishi4, Bandana Neupane5, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Perceptions of people regarding COVID-19 influences their health behaviour in terms of seeking public health services. This helps the government in planning appropriate public health strategies. Therefore, this study intends to explore the perceptions of people towards COVID-19 and their experiences during the pandemic in Nepal. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study was conducted among the public in Kathmandu, Kanchanpur, Bajura and Jhapa districts of Nepal. Eight focus group discussions and 40 in-depth interviews were conducted by using a maximum variation sampling method.
RESULTS: The findings were organised into the following themes: General understanding of COVID-19, Disease prevention, Source of information and misconceptions, Expectation and challenges; and Personal and societal consequences of COVID-19, social distancing and lockdown. There was a good general understanding among respondents about COVID-19, personal preventive measures and population-level strategies. They responded that the use of masks, sanitisers, handwashing and proper lockdown would help to prevent the disease. The respondents acknowledged the vital role of media in increasing awareness. Participants also expressed concerns over the misleading news spread by some media. The lack of social interaction, isolation and loss of income were raised as pertinent issues by the participants as potentially leading to psychological consequences. Health workers and public both raised concerns over inadequate Personal Protective Equipment, under-prepared health system, unorganised public quarantine centres, and public violation of lockdown
CONCLUSIONS: This study reports participants' views on disease prevention measures such as maintaining personal hygiene, adhering to physical distancing, and using personal protective equipments. Additionally, it illuminates the confusion among public due to conflicting public health messages from different sources of information which was deemed as misleading by the participants. This research sheds light on people's perspectives and experiences that can inform population-targeted policies in the future. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; infectious diseases; public health

Year:  2020        PMID: 33310812     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  10 in total

1.  COVID-19 worries, concerns and mitigation behaviours: A snapshot of Nepal during the first wave.

Authors:  Melanie S Askari; Emily Treleaven; Dirgha Ghimire; William Axinn; Sabrina Hermosilla
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Operational Gaps in Implementing the COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing in Madhesh Province of Nepal, May-July 2021.

Authors:  Nishant Thakur; Florian Vogt; Srinath Satyanarayana; Divya Nair; Krishna Garu; Koshal Chandra Subedee; Shrawan Kumar Mandal; Amrit Pokhrel; Dipendra Gautam; Krishna Prasad Paudel
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural Odisha, India: Knowledge, Preventative Actions, and Impacts on Daily Life.

Authors:  Valerie Bauza; Gloria D Sclar; Alokananda Bisoyi; Ajilé Owens; Apurva Ghugey; Thomas Clasen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Patient and public engagement in decision-making regarding infectious disease outbreak management: an integrative review.

Authors:  Sophie Kemper; Mej Bongers; Ene Slok; L J Schoonmade; Jfh Kupper; A Timen
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-11

Review 5.  Community-Level Experiences, Understandings, and Responses to COVID-19 in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Ethnographic Studies.

Authors:  Christopher B Raymond; Paul R Ward
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Handball Training and Competition With Facemasks in Galicia: The FISICOVID-DXTGALEGO Protocols Experience.

Authors:  Javier Rico-Díaz; Dan Río-Rodríguez; Joaquín Gómez-Varela; Rafael Martín-Acero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  Public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities.

Authors:  Cliodna McNulty; Eirwen Sides; Amy Thomas; Atiya Kamal; Rowshonara B Syeda; Awatif Kaissi; Donna M Lecky; Mahendra Patel; Ines Campos-Matos; Rashmi Shukla; Colin S Brown; Manish Pareek; Loretta Sollars; Laura Nellums; Jane Greenway; Leah Ffion Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  COVID- 19 and human right to food: lived experiences of the urban poor in Kenya with the impacts of government's response measures, a participatory qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wambui Kimani-Murage; David Osogo; Carolyn Kemunto Nyamasege; Emmy Kageha Igonya; David Otieno Ngira; John Harrington
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.135

9.  Exploring experiences of quarantined people during the early phase of COVID-19 outbreak in Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples' Region of Ethiopia: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ararso Baru Olani; Nega Degefa; Zeleke Aschalew; Mekdim Kassa; Tesfaye Feleke; Girma Gura; Sarah Namee Wambete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 10.  Stigmatization from Work-Related COVID-19 Exposure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Melanie Schubert; Julia Ludwig; Alice Freiberg; Taurai Monalisa Hahne; Karla Romero Starke; Maria Girbig; Gudrun Faller; Christian Apfelbacher; Olaf von dem Knesebeck; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.