Literature DB >> 33310543

Worldwide actions against plastic pollution from microbeads and microplastics in cosmetics focusing on European policies. Has the issue been handled effectively?

Lamprini Anagnosti1, Athanasia Varvaresou2, Panagoula Pavlou3, Evangelia Protopapa4, Vilelmine Carayanni5.   

Abstract

Microbeads are solid primary microplastics < 5 mm in diameter that are added to cosmetic products for cleansing and/or exfoliation of the skin. After use, they are discharged into the drain and end up in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs), from which they can escape into waters. Once disposed, there is no efficient method of recovery and the environmental conditions do not allow full biodegradation. Focusing mainly on the possible effect of microbeads on the environment and the human health, and taking into account that there have always been alternatives with similar cost, scientists suggested banning microbeads from cosmetic products. Despite the increasing knowledge on the microplastics' effects, the pressure from non-governmental organizations (NGO's) and the increasing public concern, few European and other countries worldwide have taken legislative steps against microbeads, and even fewer against other microplastics used in cosmetic products, mainly because it is a common belief that cosmetic industries responded massively to the call for a phase-out. Although EU acted soon after scientists focused on microbeads' effects by restricting cosmetics with microbeads to bare the EU Ecolabel in 2014, there is still no European-wide ban, which will probably take place as of 2022. Present study offers a thorough literature review on the presence of microbeads in cosmetics up to date, focusing primarily on the actions against their use, and questioning whether future pollution from microbeads or/and microplastics in cosmetics has been successfully handled.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cosmetics; ECHA; European policies; Microbeads; Microplastics; Phase-out

Year:  2020        PMID: 33310543     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  9 in total

1.  Trends of microplastic abundance in personal care products in the United Arab Emirates over the period of 3 years (2018-2020).

Authors:  Rana Zeeshan Habib; Jawaher A K Aldhanhani; Alia Hilal Ali; Furtuna Ghebremedhin; Mariam Elkashlan; Mikal Mesfun; Wajeeh Kittaneh; Ruwaya Al Kindi; Thies Thiemann
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 2.  Microplastics in environment: global concern, challenges, and controlling measures.

Authors:  G Lamichhane; A Acharya; R Marahatha; B Modi; R Paudel; A Adhikari; B K Raut; S Aryal; N Parajuli
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Environmental Impacts of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Current Overview.

Authors:  Ayodeji Amobonye; Prashant Bhagwat; Sindhu Raveendran; Suren Singh; Santhosh Pillai
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  A Review of Human Exposure to Microplastics and Insights Into Microplastics as Obesogens.

Authors:  Kurunthachalam Kannan; Krishnamoorthi Vimalkumar
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  Biocosmetics: technological advances and future outlook.

Authors:  Nishu Goyal; Frankline Jerold
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.190

6.  Unlocking the Hidden Potential of Cosmetics Waste for Building Sustainable Green Pavements in the Future: A Case Study of Discarded Lipsticks.

Authors:  Nader Nciri; Namho Kim; Arnaud Caron
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Microplastics waste in environment: A perspective on recycling issues from PPE kits and face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Saikat Sinha Ray; Hyung Kae Lee; Dao Thi Thanh Huyen; Shiao-Shing Chen; Young-Nam Kwon
Journal:  Environ Technol Innov       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 8.  Physical and biomimetic treatment methods to reduce microplastic waste accumulation.

Authors:  Hyesoo Lee; Joo Eun Shim; In Hae Park; Kyung Sil Choo; Min-Kyeong Yeo
Journal:  Mol Cell Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Humulus lupulus Extract In Vivo Depends on the Galenic System of the Topical Formulation.

Authors:  Zita Hurth; Marie-Luise Faber; Fabian Gendrisch; Martin Holzer; Birgit Haarhaus; Anja Cawelius; Kay Schwabe; Christoph Mathis Schempp; Ute Wölfle
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.