Literature DB >> 33310145

Robotic Surgery: The Impact of Simulation and Other Innovative Platforms on Performance and Training.

Shirin Azadi1, Isabel C Green2, Anne Arnold3, Mireille Truong4, Jacqueline Potts1, Martin A Martino5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the current status of robotic training and the impact of various training platforms on the performance of robotic surgical trainees. DATA SOURCES: Literature review of Google Scholar and PubMed. The search terms included a combination of the following: "robotic training," "simulation," "robotic curriculum," "obgyn residency robotic training," "virtual reality robotic training," "DaVinci training," "surgical simulation," "gyn surgical training." The sources considered for inclusion included peer-reviewed articles, literature reviews, textbook chapters, and statements from various institutions involved in resident training. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A literature search of Google Scholar and PubMed using terms related to robotic surgery and robotics training, as mentioned in the "Data Sources" section.
RESULTS: Multiple novel platforms that use machine learning and real-time video feedback to teach and evaluate robotic surgical skills have been developed over recent years. Various training curricula, virtual reality simulators, and other robotic training tools have been shown to enhance robotic surgical education and improve surgical skills. The integration of didactic learning, simulation, and intraoperative teaching into more comprehensive training curricula shows positive effects on robotic skills proficiency. Few robotic surgery training curricula have been validated through peer-reviewed study, and there is more work to be completed in this area. In addition, there is a lack of information about how the skills obtained through robotics curricula and simulation translate into operating room performance and patient outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Data collected to date show promising advances in the training of robotic surgeons. A diverse array of curricula for training robotic surgeons continue to emerge, and existing teaching modalities are evolving to keep up with the rapidly growing demand for proficient robotic surgeons. Futures areas of growth include establishing competency benchmarks for existing training tools, validating existing curricula, and determining how to translate the acquired skills in simulation into performance in the operating room and patient outcomes. Many surgical training platforms are beginning to expand beyond discrete robotic skills training to procedure-specific and team training. There is still a wealth of research to be done to understand how to create an effective training experience for gynecologic surgical trainees and robotics teams.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Innovation; Robotics; Simulation; Simulator; Technology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33310145     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  9 in total

1.  Robotic simulation: validation and qualitative assessment of a general surgery resident training curriculum.

Authors:  Mia S Turbati; Matthew I Goldblatt; Jon C Gould; Rana M Higgins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Pediatric robotic surgery: issues in management-expert consensus from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP).

Authors:  Simonetta Tesoro; Piergiorgio Gamba; Mirko Bertozzi; Rachele Borgogni; Fabio Caramelli; Giovanni Cobellis; Giuseppe Cortese; Ciro Esposito; Tommaso Gargano; Rossella Garra; Giulia Mantovani; Laura Marchesini; Simonetta Mencherini; Mario Messina; Gerald Rogan Neba; Gloria Pelizzo; Simone Pizzi; Giovanna Riccipetitoni; Alessandro Simonini; Costanza Tognon; Mario Lima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Acquisition of robotic surgical skills does not require laparoscopic training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roberto Vanin Pinto Ribeiro; João Maximiliano; Guilherme Barreiro; Olavo Haas de Souza Gastal; Pauline Simas Machado; Luciano Paludo Marcelino; Henrique Rasia Bosi; Eduardo Madalosso Zanin; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 4.  More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences.

Authors:  Samuel Marcos-Pablos; Francisco José García-Peñalvo
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 5.  A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education.

Authors:  Daniel M Costello; Isabel Huntington; Grace Burke; Brooke Farrugia; Andrea J O'Connor; Anthony J Costello; Benjamin C Thomas; Philip Dundee; Ahmed Ghazi; Niall Corcoran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

6.  Analysis of the Challenges of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) for the Smart Supply Chain (Case Study: FMCG Industries).

Authors:  Hamed Nozari; Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz; Javid Ghahremani-Nahr
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Medical malpractice in robotic surgery: a Westlaw database analysis.

Authors:  Emma De Ravin; Elizabeth A Sell; Jason G Newman; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 8.  Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Youssef Youssef; Huda Afaneh; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

9.  Opportunities and Barriers to Rural Telerobotic Surgical Health Care in 2021: Report and Research Agenda from a Stakeholder Workshop.

Authors:  Ryan N Hansen; Basil Matthew Saour; Brian Serafini; Blake Hannaford; Lanu Kim; Takayoshi Kohno; Ryan James; Wayne Monsky; Stephen P Seslar
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.033

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.