Takaaki Suzuki1,2, Tohru Ikeda3. 1. Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0810, Japan. takaakisuzuki@let.hokudai.ac.jp. 2. National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan. takaakisuzuki@let.hokudai.ac.jp. 3. Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0810, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The raccoon (Procyon lotor) is an invasive, non-native species in Japan. Throughout the country, it causes significant agricultural damage and negatively affects native biodiversity. Most of the responsibility for raccoon management lies with local government, and there are still many challenges to be overcome. Although raccoon populations have not been eradicated, intensive control campaigns such as focus on the early stages of invasion have controlled raccoons in some regions. To improve the national management of raccoons, we conducted a survey on raccoon management systems in local government departments considered to solve the challenges recognized in many areas. During 2014 and 2015, we surveyed three different municipal departments about raccoon management measures. The semi-structured interview survey covered two topics: (1) the situation leading up to the current management system; (2) the current management system. RESULTS: Our results describe the scope and methods used in raccoon management. The government staff managed raccoons using monitoring, employing a variety of methods, a range of budgets, and various role divisions. The management practices are similar in that they share a sense of taking precautions, collaborating with stakeholders, understanding that adequate methods must be used, and obtaining support from experts. CONCLUSIONS: Our case studies reveal the challenges in raccoon management faced by local government officers in regions with active control. The management systems and methods that we surveyed seemed to be effective in solving problems in both developed and undeveloped areas.
BACKGROUND: The raccoon (Procyon lotor) is an invasive, non-native species in Japan. Throughout the country, it causes significant agricultural damage and negatively affects native biodiversity. Most of the responsibility for raccoon management lies with local government, and there are still many challenges to be overcome. Although raccoon populations have not been eradicated, intensive control campaigns such as focus on the early stages of invasion have controlled raccoons in some regions. To improve the national management of raccoons, we conducted a survey on raccoon management systems in local government departments considered to solve the challenges recognized in many areas. During 2014 and 2015, we surveyed three different municipal departments about raccoon management measures. The semi-structured interview survey covered two topics: (1) the situation leading up to the current management system; (2) the current management system. RESULTS: Our results describe the scope and methods used in raccoon management. The government staff managed raccoons using monitoring, employing a variety of methods, a range of budgets, and various role divisions. The management practices are similar in that they share a sense of taking precautions, collaborating with stakeholders, understanding that adequate methods must be used, and obtaining support from experts. CONCLUSIONS: Our case studies reveal the challenges in raccoon management faced by local government officers in regions with active control. The management systems and methods that we surveyed seemed to be effective in solving problems in both developed and undeveloped areas.
Authors: Richard M Cowling; Benis Egoh; Andrew T Knight; Patrick J O'Farrell; Belinda Reyers; Mathieu Rouget; Dirk J Roux; Adam Welz; Angelika Wilhelm-Rechman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tim S Doherty; Alistair S Glen; Dale G Nimmo; Euan G Ritchie; Chris R Dickman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Franck Courchamp; Alice Fournier; Céline Bellard; Cleo Bertelsmeier; Elsa Bonnaud; Jonathan M Jeschke; James C Russell Journal: Trends Ecol Evol Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 17.712
Authors: Ana S Vaz; Christoph Kueffer; Christian A Kull; David M Richardson; Stefan Schindler; A Jesús Muñoz-Pajares; Joana R Vicente; João Martins; Cang Hui; Ingolf Kühn; João P Honrado Journal: Ambio Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.129
Authors: Ross T Shackleton; David M Richardson; Charlie M Shackleton; Brett Bennett; Sarah L Crowley; Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz; Rodrigo A Estévez; Anke Fischer; Christoph Kueffer; Christian A Kull; Elizabete Marchante; Ana Novoa; Luke J Potgieter; Jetske Vaas; Ana S Vaz; Brendon M H Larson Journal: J Environ Manage Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 6.789
Authors: Nick D Holmes; Dena R Spatz; Steffen Oppel; Bernie Tershy; Donald A Croll; Brad Keitt; Piero Genovesi; Ian J Burfield; David J Will; Alexander L Bond; Alex Wegmann; Alfonso Aguirre-Muñoz; André F Raine; Charles R Knapp; Chung-Hang Hung; David Wingate; Erin Hagen; Federico Méndez-Sánchez; Gerard Rocamora; Hsiao-Wei Yuan; Jakob Fric; James Millett; James Russell; Jill Liske-Clark; Eric Vidal; Hervé Jourdan; Karl Campbell; Keith Springer; Kirsty Swinnerton; Lolita Gibbons-Decherong; Olivier Langrand; M de L Brooke; Miguel McMinn; Nancy Bunbury; Nuno Oliveira; Paolo Sposimo; Pedro Geraldes; Pete McClelland; Peter Hodum; Peter G Ryan; Rafael Borroto-Páez; Ray Pierce; Richard Griffiths; Robert N Fisher; Ross Wanless; Stesha A Pasachnik; Steve Cranwell; Thierry Micol; Stuart H M Butchart Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.240