Literature DB >> 24962114

A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists.

Katie Moon1, Deborah Blackman.   

Abstract

Natural scientists are increasingly interested in social research because they recognize that conservation problems are commonly social problems. Interpreting social research, however, requires at least a basic understanding of the philosophical principles and theoretical assumptions of the discipline, which are embedded in the design of social research. Natural scientists who engage in social science but are unfamiliar with these principles and assumptions can misinterpret their results. We developed a guide to assist natural scientists in understanding the philosophical basis of social science to support the meaningful interpretation of social research outcomes. The 3 fundamental elements of research are ontology, what exists in the human world that researchers can acquire knowledge about; epistemology, how knowledge is created; and philosophical perspective, the philosophical orientation of the researcher that guides her or his action. Many elements of the guide also apply to the natural sciences. Natural scientists can use the guide to assist them in interpreting social science research to determine how the ontological position of the researcher can influence the nature of the research; how the epistemological position can be used to support the legitimacy of different types of knowledge; and how philosophical perspective can shape the researcher's choice of methods and affect interpretation, communication, and application of results. The use of this guide can also support and promote the effective integration of the natural and social sciences to generate more insightful and relevant conservation research outcomes.
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diseño de investigación; epistemology; epistemología; interdisciplinary research; investigación interdisciplinaria; ontology; ontología; perspectiva teórica; research design; theoretical perspective; visión mundial; worldview

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24962114     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  21 in total

1.  Institutional insights on integrating social and environmental science for solutions-driven research.

Authors:  Keely Maxwell; Bryan Hubbell; Emily Eisenhauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Policy       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.581

2.  Understanding conservation conflicts associated with rodent outbreaks in farmland areas.

Authors:  Valentin Lauret; Miguel Delibes-Mateos; François Mougeot; Beatriz Arroyo-Lopez
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Revisiting social MPE: an integration of molecular pathological epidemiology and social science in the new era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Jin Dai; Akihiro Nishi; Nathan Tran; Yasumasa Yamamoto; George Dewey; Tomotaka Ugai; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.670

4.  Power, politics, and culture of marine conservation technology in fisheries.

Authors:  Lekelia D Jenkins
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 7.563

Review 5.  Credibility and advocacy in conservation science.

Authors:  Cristi C Horton; Tarla Rai Peterson; Paulami Banerjee; Markus J Peterson
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Biosocial Conservation: Integrating Biological and Ethnographic Methods to Study Human-Primate Interactions.

Authors:  Joanna M Setchell; Emilie Fairet; Kathryn Shutt; Siân Waters; Sandra Bell
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Evoked pleasure and approach-avoidance in response to pollution.

Authors:  Anaïs Beaumont; Thierry Lelard; Harold Mouras; Sylvie Granon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Forest Therapy Alone or with a Guide: Is There a Difference between Self-Guided Forest Therapy and Guided Forest Therapy Programs?

Authors:  Jin-Gun Kim; Won-Sop Shin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Farmers' perception of the role of veterinary surgeons in vaccination strategies on British dairy farms.

Authors:  I F Richens; P Hobson-West; M L Brennan; R Lowton; J Kaler; W Wapenaar
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.695

10.  Digital innovation through partnership between nature conservation organisations and academia: a qualitative impact assessment.

Authors:  Carlos Galán-Díaz; Peter Edwards; John D Nelson; René van der Wal
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.