Literature DB >> 33306991

Safety and immunogenicity of the adjunct therapeutic vaccine ID93 + GLA-SE in adults who have completed treatment for tuberculosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.

Tracey A Day1, Adam Penn-Nicholson2, Angelique Kany Kany Luabeya2, Andrew Fiore-Gartland3, Nelita Du Plessis4, Andre G Loxton4, Julie Vergara1, Tom A Rolf1, Tim D Reid2, Asma Toefy2, Justin Shenje2, Hendrik Geldenhuys2, Michele Tameris2, Simbarashe Mabwe2, Nicole Bilek2, Linda-Gail Bekker5, Andreas Diacon6, Gerhard Walzl4, Jill Ashman1, Aude Frevol1, Zachary K Sagawa1, Cecilia Lindestam Arlehamn7, Alessandro Sette7, Steven G Reed1, Rhea N Coler8, Thomas J Scriba2, Mark Hatherill9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A therapeutic vaccine that prevents recurrent tuberculosis would be a major advance in the development of shorter treatment regimens. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the ID93 + GLA-SE vaccine at various doses and injection schedules in patients with previously treated tuberculosis.
METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial was conducted at three clinical sites near Cape Town, South Africa. Patients were recruited at local clinics after receiving 4 months of tuberculosis treatment, and screened for eligibility after providing written informed consent. Participants were aged 18-60 years, BCG-vaccinated, HIV-uninfected, and diagnosed with drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis. Eligible patients had completed standard treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis in the past 28 days. Participants were enrolled after completing standard treatment and randomly assigned sequentially to receive vaccine or placebo in three cohorts: 2 μg intramuscular ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE on days 0 and 56 (cohort 1); 10 μg ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE on days 0 and 56 (cohort 2); 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE on days 0 and 56 and placebo on day 28 (cohort 3); 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE on days 0, 28, and 56 (cohort 3); or placebo on days 0 and 56 (cohorts 1 and 2), with the placebo group for cohort 3 receiving an additional injection on day 28. Randomisation was in a ratio of 3:1 for ID93 + GLA-SE and saline placebo in cohorts 1 and 2, and in a ratio of 3:3:1 for (2 ×) ID93 + GLA-SE, (3 ×) ID93 + GLA-SE, and placebo in cohort 3. The primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity (vaccine-specific antibody response and T-cell response). For the safety outcome, participants were observed for 30 min after each injection, injection site reactions and systemic adverse events were monitored until day 84, and serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest were monitored for 6 months after the last injection. Vaccine-specific antibody responses were measured by serum ELISA, and T-cell responses after stimulation with vaccine antigens were measured in cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells specimens using intracellular cytokine staining followed by flow cytometry. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465216.
FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2015, and May 30, 2016, we assessed 177 patients for inclusion. 61 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive: saline placebo (n=5) or (2 ×) 2 μg ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE (n=15) on days 0 and 56 (cohort 1); saline placebo (n=2) or (2 ×) 10 μg ID93 + 2 μg GLA-SE (n=5) on days 0 and 56 (cohort 2); saline placebo (n=5) on days 0, 28 and 56, or 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE (n=15) on days 0 and 56 and placebo injection on day 28, or (3 ×) 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE (n=14) on days 0, 28, and 56 (cohort 3). ID93 + GLA-SE induced robust and durable antibody responses and specific, polyfunctional CD4 T-cell responses to vaccine antigens. Two injections of the 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE dose induced antigen-specific IgG and CD4 T-cell responses that were significantly higher than those with placebo and persisted for the 6-month study duration. Mild to moderate injection site pain was reported after vaccination across all dose combinations, and induration and erythema in patients given 2 μg ID93 + 5 μg GLA-SE in two or three doses. One participant had grade 3 erythema and induration at the injection site. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were observed.
INTERPRETATION: Vaccination with ID93 + GLA-SE was safe and immunogenic for all tested regimens. These data support further evaluation of ID93 + GLA-SE in therapeutic vaccination strategies to improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust (102028/Z/13/Z).
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33306991     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30319-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  9 in total

Review 1.  BCG vaccination strategies against tuberculosis: updates and perspectives.

Authors:  Mengjin Qu; Xiangmei Zhou; Hao Li
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Development and Testing of a Spray-Dried Tuberculosis Vaccine Candidate in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Mellissa Gomez; Mushtaq Ahmed; Shibali Das; Joseph McCollum; Leah Mellett; Rosemary Swanson; Ananya Gupta; Nicholas B Carrigy; Hui Wang; David Barona; Shital Bachchhav; Alana Gerhardt; Chris Press; Michelle C Archer; Hong Liang; Emilie Seydoux; Ryan M Kramer; Philip J Kuehl; Reinhard Vehring; Shabaana A Khader; Christopher B Fox
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  It Takes a Village: The Multifaceted Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Vaccine-Induced Immunity.

Authors:  Sasha E Larsen; Brittany D Williams; Maham Rais; Rhea N Coler; Susan L Baldwin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Recent Advances in the Development of Toll-like Receptor Agonist-Based Vaccine Adjuvants for Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Jing-Xing Yang; Jen-Chih Tseng; Guann-Yi Yu; Yunping Luo; Chi-Ying F Huang; Yi-Ren Hong; Tsung-Hsien Chuang
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 5.  Therapeutic Vaccines for Tuberculosis: An Overview.

Authors:  Rania Bouzeyen; Babak Javid
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  Therapeutic efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis using ID93 and liposomal adjuvant formulations.

Authors:  Susan L Baldwin; Valerie A Reese; Sasha E Larsen; Tiffany Pecor; Bryan P Brown; Brian Granger; Brendan K Podell; Christopher B Fox; Steven G Reed; Rhea N Coler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 7.  Mycobacterium abscessus: It's Complex.

Authors:  Hazem F M Abdelaal; Edward D Chan; Lisa Young; Susan L Baldwin; Rhea N Coler
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-19

8.  Balance between Protection and Pathogenic Response to Aerosol Challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in Mice Vaccinated with TriFu64, a Fusion Consisting of Three Mtb Antigens.

Authors:  Sadaf Sulman; Benjamin O Savidge; Kawther Alqaseer; Mrinal K Das; Neda Nezam Abadi; John E Pearl; Obolbek Turapov; Galina V Mukamolova; M Waheed Akhtar; Andrea May Cooper
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Enhancement of CD4+ T Cell Function as a Strategy for Improving Antibiotic Therapy Efficacy in Tuberculosis: Does It Work?

Authors:  Diego L Costa; Eduardo P Amaral; Sivaranjani Namasivayam; Lara R Mittereder; Bruno B Andrade; Alan Sher
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.