| Literature DB >> 34235093 |
Diego L Costa1,2,3, Eduardo P Amaral3, Sivaranjani Namasivayam3, Lara R Mittereder3,4, Bruno B Andrade5,6,7,8,9,10,11, Alan Sher3.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) remains a major public health problem worldwide due in part to the lack of an effective vaccine and to the lengthy course of antibiotic treatment required for successful cure. Combined immuno/chemotherapeutic intervention represents a major strategy for developing more effective therapies against this important pathogen. Because of the major role of CD4+ T cells in containing Mtb infection, augmentation of bacterial specific CD4+ T cell responses has been considered as an approach in achieving this aim. Here we present new data from our own research aimed at determining whether boosting CD4+ T cell responses can promote antibiotic clearance. In these studies, we first characterized the impact of antibiotic treatment of infected mice on Th1 responses to major Mtb antigens and then performed experiments aimed at sustaining CD4+ T cell responsiveness during antibiotic treatment. These included IL-12 infusion, immunization with ESAT-6 and Ag85B immunodominant peptides and adoptive transfer of Th1-polarized CD4+ T cells specific for ESAT-6 or Ag85B during the initial month of chemotherapy. These approaches failed to enhance antibiotic clearance of Mtb, indicating that boosting Th1 responses to immunogenic Mtb antigens highly expressed by actively dividing bacteria is not an effective strategy to be used in the initial phase of antibiotic treatment, perhaps because replicating organisms are the first to be eliminated by the drugs. These results are discussed in the context of previously published findings addressing this concept along with possible alternate approaches for harnessing Th1 immunity as an adjunct to chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: CD4+ T lymphocytes; IFN-γ; IL-12; TNF; adaptive immunity; host-directed therapy; tuberculosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34235093 PMCID: PMC8256258 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.672527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Antibiotic treatment of Mtb-infected mice results in rapid decrease in pulmonary IL-12p40 production and ESAT-6-specific Th1 response. (A) C57BL/6 (red dots and line) or TCRα-/- (blue dots and line) mice were infected with 100 CFU of M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv and then treated, starting at 14 days post-infection (dpi), with a cocktail containing rifampicin (10 mg/kg), isoniazid (25 mg/kg) and pyrazinamide (150 mg/kg) (RHZ) for the first 56 days, followed by a continuation phase in which mice received only rifampicin (10 mg/kg), isoniazid (25 mg/kg) until 126 dpi. Graph shows pulmonary bacterial loads 70 dpi (56 days post-treatment - dpt) and 126 dpi (112 dpt); (B–G) C57BL/6 mice were infected with 100 CFU of M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv and then treated or not, starting at 28 dpi (day 0 post-treatment), with a cocktail containing rifampicin (10 mg/kg), isoniazid (25 mg/kg) and pyrazinamide (150 mg/kg) (RHZ); (B) Pulmonary bacterial loads in non-treated (NT – white dots) and antibiotic treated (RHZ – gray dots) Mtb-infected mice at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 dpt; (C) IL-12p40 mRNA expression (left panel) and protein quantification (right panel) in lung homogenates of non-treated (NT – white dots) or antibiotic treated (RHZ – gray dots) Mtb-infected mice at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 dpt; (D) Graphs and (E) representative dot plots depicting frequencies of ESAT-6 and Ag85B - specific CD4+CD44+ T lymphocytes (Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+/Foxp3-/CD44+/tetramer+) in lungs of NT or RHZ treated Mtb-infected mice, 10 and 40 dpt; (F) Graphs and (G) representative dot plots depicting IFNγ and TNF double producing and IL-17-producing pulmonary CD4+CD44+ T lymphocytes (Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+/Foxp3-/CD44+/IFNγ+TNF+or IL-17+) after ex vivo stimulation with ESAT-6 or Ag85B peptides in NT or RHZ treated Mtb-infected mice, at 10 and 40 dpt. Representative data of 2 independent experiments containing 4-5 mice/group are shown. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (A–D, F) and dot plots from flow cytometry concatenated data (E, G). Statistical analysis: unpaired Student’s t test. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 2Strategies focused on enhancement of Th1 responses fail to improve bacterial clearance in Mtb-infected mice during the first four weeks of antibiotic treatment. In all experiments, C57BL/6 or B6.SLJ mice were treated or not, starting at 28 days post-infection (dpi) with a cocktail containing rifampicin (10 mg/kg), isoniazid (25 mg/kg) and pyrazinamide (150 mg/kg) (RHZ) for 28 days (until 56 dpi). (A) Treatment strategy for (B–D), in which Mtb-infected mice were treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with recombinant murine IL-12p70 (350 ng/mouse/dose, 3× per week - between 28 and 56 dpi - intraperitoneally); (B) Pulmonary bacterial loads in Mtb-infected mice treated as in described in (A), at 56 dpi (28 days post-treatment - dpt); (C) Graphs and (D) representative dot plots of IFNγ and TNF-producing pulmonary CD4+CD44+ T lymphocytes (Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+/Foxp3-/CD44+/IFNγ+TNF+) after ex vivo stimulation with ESAT-6 or Ag85B peptide, which were obtained from Mtb-infected mice treated as in described in (A) at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (E) Treatment strategy for (F-H), in which Mtb-infected mice were treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with recombinant murine IL-12p70 (350 ng/mouse/dose at 42, 44 and 46 dpi intraperitoneally); (F) Pulmonary bacterial loads in Mtb-infected mice treated as in described in (E), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (G) Graphs and (H) representative dot plots of IFNγ and TNF-producing pulmonary CD4+CD44+ T lymphocytes (Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+/Foxp3-/CD44+/IFNγ+TNF+) after ex vivo stimulation with ESAT-6 or Ag85B peptide, which were obtained from Mtb-infected mice treated as in described in (E), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (I) Treatment strategy for (J–O), in which Mtb-infected mice were treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with ESAT-6 1-20 peptide (J–L) (100 μg/mouse/dose at 35, 42 and 49 dpi, intravenously) or Ag85B 280-294 peptide (M–O) (100 μg/mouse/dose 35, 42 and 49 dpi, intravenously); (J) Pulmonary bacterial loads in Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with ESAT-6 as in described in (I), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (K) Graphs and (L) representative dot plots of IFNγ and TNF-producing pulmonary CD4+CD44+ T lymphocytes (Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+/Foxp3-/CD44+/IFNγ+TNF+) after ex vivo stimulation with ESAT-6 peptide, which were obtained from Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with ESAT-6 as in described in (I), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (M) Pulmonary bacterial loads in Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with Ag85B as in described in (I), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (N) Graphs and (O) representative dot plots of IFNγ and TNF-producing pulmonary CD4+CD44+ T lymphocytes (Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+/Foxp3-/CD44+/IFNγ+TNF+) after ex vivo stimulation with Ag85B peptide, which were obtained from Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with Ag85B as in described in (I), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (P) Treatment strategy for (Q-V), in which Mtb-infected mice were treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with adoptive transfer of Th1-polarized C7 TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells (Q–S) (5 x 105 cells/dose/mouse at 38, 45 and 52 dpi, intravenously) or Th1-polarized P25 TCR transgenic CD4+ T cells (T–V) (5 x 105 cells/dose/mouse at 38, 45 and 52 dpi, intravenously); (Q) Pulmonary bacterial loads in Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with C7 cell transfer as in described in (P), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (R) Graph and (S) representative dot plots of C7 TCR transferred cells (gated among Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+FoxP3-CD44+ cells) isolated from lungs of Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with C7 cell transfer as described in (P), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (T) Pulmonary bacterial loads in Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with P25 cell transfer as in described in (P), at 56 dpi (28 dpt); (U) Graph and (V) representative dot plots of P25 TCR transferred cells (gated among Singlets/Live/TCRβ+CD4+FoxP3-CD44+ cells) isolated from lungs of Mtb-infected mice treated or not with RHZ in combination or not with P25 cell transfer as in described in (P), at 56 dpi (28 dpt). Representative data from a single experiment (B–D, F–H, T–V) or 2 independent experiments (J–O, Q–S), all containing 4 mice/group are shown. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (B, C, F, G, J, K, M, N, Q, R, T, U) and dot plots from flow cytometry concatenated data (D, H, L, O, S, V). Statistical analysis: unpaired Student’s t test. (B, C, F, G, J, K, M, N, Q, T) *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001 and ****p ≤ 0.0001 compared to NT; xp ≤ 0.05, xxp≤ 0.01, xxxp≤ 0.001 and xxxxp≤ 0.0001 compared to IL-12 or ESAT-6 or C7, or Ag85B or P25; #p ≤ 0.05, ##p ≤ 0.01, ###p ≤ 0.001; ####p ≤ 0.0001 and n.s., non-significant, where indicated. (R, U): *p ≤ 0.05 and ***p ≤ 0.001.