Literature DB >> 33304804

Alkaline phosphatase (alp) levels in multiple myeloma and solid cancers with bone lesions: Is there any difference?

O Annibali1, M T Petrucci1, D Santini2, V Bongarzoni1, M Russano2, F Pisani1, O Venditti3, F Pantano2, A Rago1, A Siniscalchi1, E Cerchiara1, L Franceschini1, L De Rosa1, M Mariani4, S Andriani1, L Cudillo1, M Garcia1, M Cantonetti1, S Mohamed1, B Anaclerico1, T Caravita1, F Stocchi1, G Cimino1, S Gumenyuk1, F Vozella1, G Avvisati1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone involvement in Multiple Myeloma results from increased osteoclast formation and activity that occurs in proximity to myeloma cells. The role of Alkaline Phosphatse (ALP) in this process and the diagnostic significance of plasma levels in patients with MM are unclear. AIM: To compare plasma ALP levels in patients with MM and solid cancers and metastatic lesions to the bone.
RESULTS: In this observational retrospective study we enrolled 901 patients were enrolled: 440 patients (49%) with Multiple Myeloma, 461 (51%) with solid cancers. All 901 patients had bone lesions. Among patients with Multiple Myeloma, ALP values were mainly in the range of normality than those observed in patients with solid cancers and bone lesions. This difference is independent of stage, number and type of bone lesions.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that plasma ALP has a different clinical significance in MM than in other neoplasms and could be used as a discriminating marker in presence of bone lesions. In particular, lower or normal values, should suggest further investigations such as urinary and serum electrophoresis, associated with bone marrow aspirate in case of the presence of a monoclonal component, in order to confirm or exclude a MM diagnosis.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALP; Lytic lesions; MM; Osteoblastic lesions

Year:  2020        PMID: 33304804      PMCID: PMC7708946          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Oncol        ISSN: 2212-1366            Impact factor:   4.072


Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell neoplasm characterized by the proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. Lytic bone lesions are a very common in patients with MM and they increase with the progression of the disease [1]. MM cells induce a significant alteration of the bone remodeling process due to the increased formation and activation of osteoclasts and the suppression of osteoblast. Therefore, biochemical markers of bone turnover could be predictive of the bone status in patients with MM patients [2], [3], [4]. Among these, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) is an enzyme that is expressed in different tissues but is particularly concentrated in the liver, kidneys, placenta and bone. In the bone, it is expressed on the surface of osteoblasts and is involved in the mineralization process of removing phosphate groups from many types of molecules, including nucleotides, proteins and alkaloids. ALP plasma levels are often increased in presence of tumor bone lesions [5]. The role of ALP as a marker of skeletal involvement has been studied in several solid cancers, especially in prostate cancer. Bone involvement in MM results from increased osteoclast formation and activity that occurs in proximity to myelomatous cells associated to the suppression of osteoblasts differentiation leading to the development of lytic lesions. The role of ALP in this process and the diagnostic significance of its plasma levels are unclear in patients with MM. In this study we investigated the role of ALP by comparing ALP plasma levels in patients with MM and with solid cancers who had bone lesions.

Material and methods

Observational retrospective study was conducted on 901 patients affected from MM or solid tumors in the period between 1991 and 2015: 440 patients with MM derived from the Italian Group of the Hematologic Disease of the Adults (GIMEMA), and 461 patients with solid tumors followed at the Oncology Unit of the University Campus Bio-Medico in Rome. All living patients have joined the study by written informed consent. All patients were over the age of 18 at the time of diagnosis and did not suffer from any other bone or liver diseases responsible for the increased plasma ALP levels. Patients were considered eligible if they were affected by MM or other malignancy with bone lesions detected with only of the following radiological procedures: X-ray, computed tomography scan (CT-scan), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or bone scintigraphy. MM was diagnosed according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma [6]. Patients with MM were classified according to International Staging System classification system (ISS) and Durie-Salmon Staging System [7], [8]. MM and patients with solid Tumors were grouped according to the number of bone lesions (one lesion, two or three and more than 3 lesions), type of lesions (osteolytic, osteoblastic and mixed), number and type of bone lesion. Moreover, solid tumors were also grouped according to primary cancer (breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, kidney, stomach and other kind cancer -uterus, ovary, adrenal glands and bladder). Plasma ALP levels were collected at the time of diagnosis of malignant skeletal disease. Laboratory range of ALP between 20 and 140 U/L was considered as normal. Statistical analysis: Demographic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. ALP values were compared for each group using ANOVA test and Tukey’s post hoc test. Two tailored P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 3.0.

Results

Table 1 summarizes clinical and pathological chacteristics of the 901 patients entered in the Among patients with MM, 105 patients had only one osteolytic bone lesion (23.9%), 118 patients had 2–3 lesions (26.8%), the majority had more than three osteolytic lesions at the time of diagnosis (217 patients, 49.3%) with a mean ALP value of respectively 117.2U/L, 145.0U/L and 115.4U/L. Most patients were classified as first MM stage according to ISS classification (168 patients, 43.8%) and third stage according to DS staging (277 patients, 63%), of 57 patients ISS classification was not retrieved. Further detail of mean levels of ALP are reported in Table 1. Most patients with MM had a number of osteolytic lesions >3 (217 patients, 49.3%), first ISS stage (168 patients, 48.3%) and third stage according to the D&S stage (277 patients, 63.7%).
Table 1

Demographics and characteristics.

MULTIPLE MYELOMAN%MEAN ALPSD ALP
Total440100.0123.879.8
GENDERM22350.7122.477.3
F21749.3125.182.3
NUMBER OF OSTEOLYTIC LESIONS
110523.9117.279.8
2–311826.8145.090.4
>321749.3115.471.5
ISS STAGGE
116843.8123.678.6
211429.8114.774.0
310126.4128.786.4
DURIE AND SALMON STAGE
15011.396.1568.9
211325.7119.174.7
327763.0129.382.0
OSTEOBLASTIC LESIONS
Total
GENDERM23851.6187.1218.3
F22348.4172.3343.3
NUMBER OF LESIONS18117.6139.3126.1
2–311524.9125.299.4
>326557.5216.2360.2
Total461100.0180.0285.5
TYPE OF LESIONS
OSTEOLYTIC19341.9135.1109.0
OSTEOBLASTIC15032.5236.8450.0
MIXED11825.6181.2186.4
NUMBER AND TYPE OF LESION
1 OSTEOLYTIC388.2113.394.3
1 OSTEOBLASTIC296.3183.6168.5
1 MIXED143.0117.967.2
2–3 OSTEOLYTIC5411.7117.186.4
2–3 OSTEOBLASTIC378.0120.694.7
2–3 MIXED245.2150.8129.9
>3 OSTEOLYTIC10121.9152.9122.0
>3 OSTEOBLASTIC8418.2306.3582.5
>3 MIXED8017.5201.3210.7
HISTOTYPE
LUNG20043.4142.8424.7
BREAST13228.6176.3152.8
PROSTATE378.0328.6366.4
COLORECTAL408.7196.1151.1
KIDNEY183.983.928.37
STOMACH163.5321.7205.2
OTHERS183.9248.6261.4
Demographics and characteristics. As for solid tumors, in our population, the bone lesions were more frequently observed: lung cancers (200 patients, 43.4%), followed by breast cancer (132 patients, 28.6%), colorectal cancer (8.7%) and prostate cancer (8.0%). Less common are kidney (3.9%), stomach (3.5%) and, eventually, urothelial and gynecological cancers which account for a total of 3.9%. Regardless of the primary tumor, bone lesions were mainly multiple (82.4%, 380 patients) while osteolytic lesions were more frequent than osteoblastic lesions (193 vs 150 patients) and only 118 had mixed boner lesions. Demographics and characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Statistical analysis

In patients with Multiple Myeloma no difference can be found among gender, number of osteolytic lesions, ISS and D&S stage. Moreover, in these patients, the values of ALP are normal and commonly lower than those observed in solid tumors. This difference is evident in each group and seems independent of the stage (D&S and ISS), the number and type of bone lesions. Patients with solid cancer and bone lesions have a higher mean level of ALP (187.1 U/L) compared with MM (123.8 U/L) while the lowest levels of ALP can be found in patients with bone metastatic kidney cancer (that shows a mean level of ALP of 83.9U/L). Statistically significant differences are observed when comparing MM with prostate cancer (ALP of 328.7 U/L), particularly when this cancer shows moe than 3 lesions and when these lesion are osteoblastic (mean ALP level of 365.9 and 384.0 respectively) Table 2.
Table 2

The correlation of Alkaline phosphatase in Prostate cancer and Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple MyelomaMean ALP (SD)P-values
Alkaline phosphatase in osteoblastic tumor with more than 3 osteosclerotic lesions (mean: 306.3; SD:582.5)Total values from patients with multiple myeloma123.8 (79.8)0.0079
1 osteolytic lesion117.2 (79.8)0.0011
2–3 osteolytic lesions145.0 (90.4)0.0263
>3 osteolytic lesions115.4 (71.5)0.0001
1 ISS stage123.6 (78.6)0.0002
2 ISS stage114.7 (74.0)0.0004
3 ISS stage128.7 (86.4)0.0068
1 D&S stage96.15 (68.9)0.0171
2 D&S stage119.1 (74.7)0.001
3 D&S stage129.3 (82.0)0.0001
Alkaline phosphatase in Prostate cancer (mean: 328.7; SD: 366.4)Total values from patients with multiple myeloma123.8 (79.8)0.0076
1 osteolytic lesion117.2 (79.8)0.0394
2–3 osteolytic lesions145.0 (90.4)0.2576 (n.s)
>3 osteolytic lesions115.4 (71.5)0.0073
1 ISS stage123.6 (78.6)0.0265
2 ISS stage114.7 (74.0)0.0257
3 ISS stage128.7 (86.4)0.1091 (n.s.)
1 D&S stage96.15 (68.9)0.0843 (n.s.)
2 D&S stage119.1 (74.7)0.0407
3 D&S stage129.3 (82.0)0.0223
Alkaline phosphatase in Prostate cancer with>3 bone lesions(mean: 365.9, SD: 399.6)Total values from patients with multiple myeloma123.8 (79.8)0.0020
1 osteolytic lesion117.2 (79.8)0.0095
2–3 osteolytic lesions145.0 (90.4)0.0751 (n.s.)
>3 osteolytic lesions115.4 (71.5)0.0018
1 ISS stage123.6 (78.6)0.0065
2 ISS stage114.7 (74.0)0.0061
3 ISS stage128.7 (86.4)0.0281
1 D&S stage96.15 (68.9)0.0210
2 D&S stage119.1 (74.7)0.0099
3 D&S stage129.3 (82.0)0.0056
Alkaline phosphatase in Prostate cancer with more than 3 bone osteosclerotic lesions (mean: 384.0, SD: 435.8)Total values from patients with multiple myeloma123.8 (79.8)0.0052
1 osteolytic lesion117.2 (79.8)0.0156
2–3 osteolytic lesions145.0 (90.4)0.0973
>3 osteolytic lesions115.4 (71.5)0.0044
1 ISS stage123.6 (78.6)0.0124
2 ISS stage114.7 (74.0)0.0109
3 ISS stage128.7 (86.4)0.0401
1 D&S stage96.15 (68.9)0.0256
2 D&S stage119.1 (74.7)0.0164
3 D&S stage129.3 (82.0)0.0118

Legend: ISS: international Staging System, SD: standard Deviation.

The correlation of Alkaline phosphatase in Prostate cancer and Multiple Myeloma. Legend: ISS: international Staging System, SD: standard Deviation. Patients with solid tumors and more than 3 bone osteoblastic lesions (mean ALP of 216.2 U/L) have statistically and significantly different values of ALP when compared to lung cancer (ALP mean 142.8U/L, P = 0.002), lung cancer and osteolytic lesions (ALP mean of 115.4, P = 0.001), and solid tumors with lytic lesions (ALP mean 135.1 U/L, P = 0,001). Patients affected by prostate cancer presenting more than 3 bone lesions (mean ALP of 365.9 U/L) and patients with prostate cancer that showed more than 3 osteoblastic lesions (mean ALP of 384.0U/L) have significantly different values of ALP when compared to solid cancers and osteolytic lesions (mean ALP of 135.1U/L, P = 0.015 and P = 0.027 respectively), lung cancer (mean ALP of 142.8U/L, P = 0.030 and P = 0.047, respectively) and lung cancer with osteolytic lesions (mean ALP of 115.4 U/L, P = 0.10 and P = 0.15, respectively).

Discussion

In solid Tumors, bone is the third most frequent site of metastasis, behind lung and liver. Bone metastatic disease develops as a result of multiple interactions between tumor cells and bone cells that cause alteration of normal bone metabolism [9]. ALP as bone turnover marker activity, in particular the bone-specific alkaline phosphatase isoform, is a sensitive and reliable measure of osteoblastic activity [10]. High levels are found in multiple malignancies and appear to be associated with risk of negative clinical outcomes [11]. However, lack of specificity and controversial data in the literature make this test not validated as standard in clinical practice. Its role as diagnostic marker or prognostic predictor for bone metastases is still potential and under study for several solid tumors. Data about prostate cancer show a good sensitivity and specificity of bone alkaline phosphatase enzyme for the prediction of bone metastases and progression of disease. The vast majority of patients with metastatic prostatic cancer to bone have the higher ALP levels. Furthermore, according to some studies, higher pre-treatment ALP levels are associated with a lower response to therapy and a poorer prognosis. These data suggest that ALP is a biological marker that could be used in the evaluation of patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma to predict bone metastases and monitor the response to treatment. Therefore, in addition to the PSA, plasma ALP should also be dosed in patients affected by prostate cancer, and not only in the suspect of skeletal involvement but also during treatment [12], [13], [14], [5], [15]. Although the role of ALP has been primarily studied in prostate cancer, there is mild evidence that it is a predictive marker of bone metastases for other solid tumors. In breast cancer, serum ALP levels increase significantly as the stage of the cancer progresses and might indicate that the disease metastasizes to bone [16]. A study carried out on patients with renal cell carcinoma shows that high levels of ALP is associated with the presence of bone metastases and little prognostic capability [17]. Even in patients with lung cancer, a study confirms the potential role of ALP serum in detecting bone metastases [18]. According to a recent study, bone alkaline phosphatase is a possible surrogate marker of bone metastasis also in gastric cancer patients [19]. By reviewing the literature, high levels of ALP appear to be a credible predictive marker of bone metastasis from solid tumors. Conversely, data about multiple myeloma are lacking. Our study confirms the potential role of high plasma ALP value as a predictor of bone metastasis in solid tumors, especially in prostate cancer and in the case of multiple osteoblastic lesions. On the contrary, in MM the plasma levels of ALP are generally normal or slightly altered, regardless of the stage (ISS or D&S) and the number of osteolytic lesions. The differences between MM and solid tumors, especially compared to prostate cancer, are significant. These results confirm that the process of bone involvement in multiple myeloma is different from that occurring in solid tumors because there is a lower bone turnover and/or osteoblastic associated to a lower expression of plasmatic ALP with is greatly related to the osteoblastic activity. Limitations of the study are the retrospective design and heterogeneity of the sample. However, this is the first study investigating the role of baseline plasma ALP in multiple myeloma on such a large number of patients, comparing it with the most prevalent tumors with bone metastases. Our study suggests that plasma ALP has a different clinical significance in MM than other cancers and it could be used as a discriminating marker in presence of bone lesions. ALP plasma dosage is a simple and cheap test that could be performed preliminarily in patients with malignant bone lesions. In case of lower or normal range values, it should suggest further simple investigations such as: urinary and serum electrophoresis, associated with bone marrow aspirate in case of the presence of monoclonal component, in order to confirm or exclude MM diagnosis.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies.

Authors:  R E Coleman
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 2.  Myeloma bone disease: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  E Terpos; M-A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Elevated alkaline phosphatase velocity strongly predicts overall survival and the risk of bone metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Adam R Metwalli; Inger L Rosner; Jennifer Cullen; Yongmei Chen; Timothy Brand; Stephen A Brassell; James Lesperance; Christopher Porter; Joseph Sterbis; David G McLeod
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Antonio Palumbo; Joan Blade; Giampaolo Merlini; María-Victoria Mateos; Shaji Kumar; Jens Hillengass; Efstathios Kastritis; Paul Richardson; Ola Landgren; Bruno Paiva; Angela Dispenzieri; Brendan Weiss; Xavier LeLeu; Sonja Zweegman; Sagar Lonial; Laura Rosinol; Elena Zamagni; Sundar Jagannath; Orhan Sezer; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Jo Caers; Saad Z Usmani; Juan José Lahuerta; Hans Erik Johnsen; Meral Beksac; Michele Cavo; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Evangelos Terpos; Robert A Kyle; Kenneth C Anderson; Brian G M Durie; Jesus F San Miguel
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Routine bone scans in patients with prostate cancer related to serum prostate-specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase.

Authors:  L F Wymenga; J H Boomsma; K Groenier; D A Piers; H J Mensink
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Association of radionuclide bone scan and serum alkaline phosphatase in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  E Seaman; E T Goluboff; S Ross; I S Sawczuk
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Predictive value of bone resorption and formation markers in cancer patients with bone metastases receiving the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid.

Authors:  Robert E Coleman; Pierre Major; Allan Lipton; Janet E Brown; Ker-Ai Lee; Matthew Smith; Fred Saad; Ming Zheng; Yong Jiang Hei; John Seaman; Richard Cook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Markers of bone turnover for the management of patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Garnero; N Buchs; J Zekri; R Rizzoli; R E Coleman; P D Delmas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The role of whole-body FDG PET/CT, Tc 99m MDP bone scintigraphy, and serum alkaline phosphatase in detecting bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Won Min; Sang-Won Um; Jae-Jun Yim; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Sung Koo Han; Young-Soo Shim; Young Whan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  1 in total

1.  Microporous structures on mineralized collagen mediate osteogenesis by modulating the osteo-immune response of macrophages.

Authors:  Jun Li; Xin Luo; Zhao-Yong Lv; Hui-Fen Qiang; Cai-Yao Hou; Kun Liu; Chun-Xiu Meng; Yu-Jue Zhang; Feng-Zhen Liu; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.