| Literature DB >> 33303894 |
Darragh R Walsh1,2, James J Lynch1,2, David T O' Connor1,2,3, David T Newport1,2, John J E Mulvihill4,5,6.
Abstract
The dural venous sinuses play an integral role in draining venous blood from the cranial cavity. As a result of the sinuses anatomical location, they are of significant importance when evaluating the mechanopathology of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite the importance of the dural venous sinuses in normal neurophysiology, no mechanical analyses have been conducted on the tissues. In this study, we conduct mechanical and structural analysis on porcine dural venous sinus tissue to help elucidate the tissues' function in healthy and diseased conditions. With longitudinal elastic moduli values ranging from 33 to 58 MPa, we demonstrate that the sinuses exhibit higher mechanical stiffness than that of native dural tissue, which may be of interest to the field of TBI modelling. Furthermore, by employing histological staining and a colour deconvolution protocol, we show that the sinuses have a collagen-dominant extracellular matrix, with collagen area fractions ranging from 84 to 94%, which likely explains the tissue's large mechanical stiffness. In summary, we provide the first investigation of the dural venous sinus mechanical behaviour with accompanying structural analysis, which may aid in understanding TBI mechanopathology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33303894 PMCID: PMC7729903 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78694-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Illustration of the regions tested with the accompanying plots of the Cauchy stress-stretch curves of the dural venous sinus samples tested in (a) the vessel’s longitudinal test direction and (b) the vessel’s circumferential test direction. Note the different scales on the x-axes of the stress-stretch graphs.
Estiff values for both the longitudinal and circumferential test directions, along with the number of tests conducted per region and testing direction.
| Region | Longitudinal (MPa) | Longitudinal tests conducted | Circumferential (MPa) | Circumferential tests conducted | Lumen diameter (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal | 32.6 ± 5.3 | 5 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 9 | 2.9 ± 0.4 |
| Parietal | 51.9 ± 13.3 | 5 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 9 | 4.1 ± 0.2 |
| Occipital | 58.1 ± 17.2 | 5 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 9 | 5.1 ± 0.6 |
| Transverse | – | – | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 10 | 3.9 ± 0.4 |
Note that while 10 tests were conducted for the transverse region in the circumferential direction, 1 test was discarded due to hardware issues. Also shown are the lumen diameter values for the various regions. Data are represented as a mean ± standard error about the mean.
Figure 2(a) Mean Estiff results for the samples tested in the longitudinal test direction utilising uniaxial tensile testing. (b) Mean Estiff results for the samples tested in the circumferential test direction utilising ring testing. *Statistical significance (), error bars represent standard error about the mean. Note that the y-axis scale differs between (a) and (b).
Figure 3Structural images of the frontal region of the SSS (a) Verhoeff–Van Gieson stained sample of the frontal region. The solid-line inset image shows what appears to be a meningeal artery (b) SEM imaging of the bone surface layer (as illustrated in dashed-line inset of (a)) showing disorganised focal aggregations of collagen fibres.
Figure 4Structural images of the parietal region of the SSS (a) Verhoeff–Van Gieson stained sample. The solid-line inset image shows the thin, collagenic wall of the sinus with a thin endothelial layer on the lumen wall (b) The arachnoid surface of the sinus (as illustrated in dashed-line inset of (a)) demonstrating collagenic alignment along the longitudinal direction of the sinus.
Figure 5Structural images of the occipital region of the SSS (a) Verhoeff–Van Gieson stained sample. The solid-line inset image again demonstrates the thin endothelial later of the dural sinus tissue (b) The surface of the occipital region lumen wall (as illustrated in dashed-line inset of (a)) depicting seemingly random collagenic alignment, with the endothelial layer removed from the maceration protocol.
Figure 6Structural images of the transverse sinus (a) Verhoeff–Van Gieson stained sample. (b) The cross-section of the dural sinus wall with the lumen (*) and arachnoid surface (#) highlighted. Distinct layers appear to constitute the wall of the dural sinus tissue.
Collagen area fraction (AF) values and smooth muscle area fraction (AF) values for the various regions of the dural venous sinuses.
| Region | Collagen area fraction (AF) (%) | Smooth muscle area fraction (AF) (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal | 84.8 ± 3.4 | 22.7 ± 4.4 |
| Parietal | 84.5 ± 3.9 | 24.8 ± 5.4 |
| Occipital | 84.5 ± 4.2 | 33.4 ± 9.4 |
| Transverse | 94.0 ± 1.1 | 49.6 ± 7.2 |
Data are represented as a mean ± standard error about the mean.