Alexander F Glick1, Michael Goonan2, Chan Kim2, Diana Sandmeyer2, Kevin Londoño2, Gabrielle Gold-von Simson2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine and New York University Langone Health, New York, New York alexander.glick@nyulangone.org. 2. Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine and New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although families positively perceive family-centered rounds (FCR), factors associated with engagement have been examined in few studies. Our objective for this study was to test the hypothesis that inviting the parent to speak and nurse presence are associated with parent engagement during FCR. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with English-speaking parents (N = 199) of inpatients on the pediatric hospital medicine service at an academic medical center. We used a standardized checklist to record outcomes of engagement (number of questions asked and participation occurrences), predictor variables (team invited parent to speak, nurse presence), and other encounter-related variables. Parents were surveyed to assess parent and child characteristics and experiences during FCR. We examined parent, child, and encounter characteristic associations with the above outcomes using bivariate analyses and (for those associated in bivariate analyses) Poisson regressions. RESULTS: Inviting the parent to speak was independently associated with the number of questions asked (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.7). Trusting the medical team was inversely associated with questions asked (IRR 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-0.97). Factors associated with total participation included invitation for the parent to speak (IRR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.6), nurse presence (IRR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5), white race (IRR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.4), clerkship student presentation (IRR 1.2; 95% CI 1.03-1.3), and parent inclusion in rounding arrangement (IRR 1.5; 95% CI 1.05-2). CONCLUSIONS: Parents present during FCR are more engaged when invited to speak. Nurse presence was associated with total parent participation. Future studies to inform interventions to optimize engagement are warranted.
OBJECTIVES: Although families positively perceive family-centered rounds (FCR), factors associated with engagement have been examined in few studies. Our objective for this study was to test the hypothesis that inviting the parent to speak and nurse presence are associated with parent engagement during FCR. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with English-speaking parents (N = 199) of inpatients on the pediatric hospital medicine service at an academic medical center. We used a standardized checklist to record outcomes of engagement (number of questions asked and participation occurrences), predictor variables (team invited parent to speak, nurse presence), and other encounter-related variables. Parents were surveyed to assess parent and child characteristics and experiences during FCR. We examined parent, child, and encounter characteristic associations with the above outcomes using bivariate analyses and (for those associated in bivariate analyses) Poisson regressions. RESULTS: Inviting the parent to speak was independently associated with the number of questions asked (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.7). Trusting the medical team was inversely associated with questions asked (IRR 0.8; 95% CI 0.6-0.97). Factors associated with total participation included invitation for the parent to speak (IRR 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.6), nurse presence (IRR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5), white race (IRR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.4), clerkship student presentation (IRR 1.2; 95% CI 1.03-1.3), and parent inclusion in rounding arrangement (IRR 1.5; 95% CI 1.05-2). CONCLUSIONS: Parents present during FCR are more engaged when invited to speak. Nurse presence was associated with total parent participation. Future studies to inform interventions to optimize engagement are warranted.
Authors: Vineeta S Mittal; Ted Sigrest; Mary C Ottolini; Daniel Rauch; Hua Lin; Brian Kit; Christopher P Landrigan; Glenn Flores Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Nwamaka D Eneanya; Michael Winter; Howard Cabral; Katherine Waite; Lori Henault; Timothy Bickmore; Amresh Hanchate; Michael Wolf; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2016
Authors: Howard S Gordon; Richard L Street; Barbara F Sharf; P Adam Kelly; Julianne Souchek Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer E Prey; Janet Woollen; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander D Sackeim; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; Susan Restaino; Steven Feiner; David K Vawdrey Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Marij A Hillen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Nina Bijker; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Daniëlle M Vermeulen; Ellen M A Smets Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 4.872