Literature DB >> 20587682

Family-centered rounds on pediatric wards: a PRIS network survey of US and Canadian hospitalists.

Vineeta S Mittal1, Ted Sigrest, Mary C Ottolini, Daniel Rauch, Hua Lin, Brian Kit, Christopher P Landrigan, Glenn Flores.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to examine pediatric hospitalist rounding practices and characteristics associated with programs conducting family-centered rounds (FCRs).
METHODS: The Pediatric Hospitalist Triennial Survey, sent to a subset of pediatric hospitalists on the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings listserv from the United States and Canada, consisted of 63 questions on sociodemographic characteristics, training, practice characteristics, and rounding practices.
RESULTS: Among 265 respondents (response rate: 70%), 78% practiced in academic hospitals and 22% in nonacademic hospitals. The prevalences of specific rounding categories were as follows: FCRs, 44%; sit-down, 24%; hallway, 21%; others, 11%. FCRs occurred significantly more often in academic (48%) than nonacademic (31%) hospitals (P = .04). FCRs can include pediatric residents, bedside nurses, charge nurses, case managers, pharmacists, and social workers. Academic settings and higher average daily patient censuses, but not FCRs, were significantly associated with prolonged rounding duration. The most commonly perceived FCR benefits included increased family involvement and understanding, trainee role modeling, and effective team communication. Physical constraints, trainees' apprehensions, and time were the main perceived FCR barriers. Greater perceived benefit/barrier ratios, FCR benefits, and family involvement in care were associated with a greater likelihood of conducting FCRs, whereas a greater number of perceived FCR barriers was associated with not conducting FCRs.
CONCLUSIONS: FCRs were the most-common rounding category among respondents. FCRs were not associated with a self-reported increase in rounding duration. Successful FCR implementation may require educating staff members and trainees about FCR benefits and addressing FCR barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20587682     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-2364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  32 in total

1.  Family experiences and pediatric health services use associated with family-centered rounds.

Authors:  Dennis Z Kuo; Laura L Sisterhen; Ted E Sigrest; James M Biazo; Mary E Aitken; Christopher E Smith
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Handheld Electronic Device Use by Pediatric Hospitalists on Family Centered Rounds.

Authors:  Jeremy Kern; Priti Bhansali
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  The APA and the rise of pediatric generalist network research.

Authors:  Richard Wasserman; Janet R Serwint; Nathan Kuppermann; Rajendu Srivastava; Benard Dreyer
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Leading educationally effective family-centered bedside rounds.

Authors:  Amonpreet K Sandhu; Harish J Amin; Kevin McLaughlin; Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

5.  Pediatrics Residents' Perspectives on Family-Centered Rounds: A Qualitative Study at 2 Children's Hospitals.

Authors:  Vineeta Mittal; Evelina Krieger; Benjamin C Lee; Terry Kind; Timothy McCavit; Joyce Campbell; Mary C Ottolini; Glenn Flores
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-03

6.  Partnering health disparities research with quality improvement science in pediatrics.

Authors:  K Casey Lion; Jean L Raphael
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Multi-stakeholder collaboration in the redesign of family-centered rounds process.

Authors:  Anping Xie; Pascale Carayon; Randi Cartmill; Yaqiong Li; Elizabeth D Cox; Julie A Plotkin; Michelle M Kelly
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Acceptability, Usability, and Effectiveness: A Qualitative Study Evaluating a Pediatric Telemedicine Program.

Authors:  Hadley S Sauers-Ford; Michelle Y Hamline; Melissa M Gosdin; Laura R Kair; Gary M Weinberg; James P Marcin; Jennifer L Rosenthal
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Cox; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Victoria P Rajamanickam; Pascale Carayon; Michelle M Kelly; Tosha B Wetterneck; Paul J Rathouz; Roger L Brown
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Strategies for improving family engagement during family-centered rounds.

Authors:  Michelle M Kelly; Anping Xie; Pascale Carayon; Lori L DuBenske; Mary L Ehlenbach; Elizabeth D Cox
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.960

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.