Literature DB >> 33302336

Tooth-Colored CAD/CAM Materials for Application in 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Molar Area: An Illustrated Clinical Comparison.

Angelika Rauch1, Sebastian Hahnel1, Elena Günther1, Wolfgang Bidmon1, Oliver Schierz1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical properties of tooth-colored computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials for the fabrication of a 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) in the same clinical scenario. A 53-year-old female patient was supplied with a 3-unit FDP to replace a second premolar in the upper jaw. Restorations were fabricated from 3 mol%, 4 mol%, and 5 mol% yttrium oxide zirconia, zirconia with translucency gradient, indirect composite resin, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). Milling time, weight, and radiopacity were investigated. Esthetics were examined following the US Public Health Service criteria (USPHS). The milling time for zirconia was twice as high as for the indirect composite resin, PEEK, or PEKK. The latter materials had a weight of 2 g each, while zirconia restorations yielded 5 g. Zirconia presented intense radiopacity. PEEK and PEKK required veneering and an opaquer was applied to the PEKK framework. All FDPs showed acceptable esthetics. PEEK and PEKK restorations were featured by a grayish shimmering. A variety of CAD/CAM materials are available to fabricate 3-unit FDPs with esthetically acceptable results. In the esthetic zone, PEEK and PEKK require veneering and an opaquer might be applied. Milling time, weight, and radiopacity were relatively high for zirconia FDPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical evaluation; dental prosthesis; fixed partial denture; monolithic zirconia; polymers

Year:  2020        PMID: 33302336      PMCID: PMC7762353          DOI: 10.3390/ma13245588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  22 in total

1.  The Use of a Modified Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) as an Alternative Framework Material for Removable Dental Prostheses. A Clinical Report.

Authors:  Panagiotis Zoidis; Ioannis Papathanasiou; Gregory Polyzois
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971.

Authors:  John F Cvar; Gunnar Ryge
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Three generations of zirconia: 
From veneered to monolithic. Part II.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Christin Keul; Marlis Eichberger; David Figge; Daniel Edelhoff; Nina Lümkemann
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.677

4.  Mechanical properties, aging stability and translucency of speed-sintered zirconia for chairside restorations.

Authors:  Stevan M Cokic; Jef Vleugels; Bart Van Meerbeek; Bernardo Camargo; Evita Willems; Maoyin Li; Fei Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Resin composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications reduce biofilm formation in vitro.

Authors:  Andrei C Ionescu; Sebastian Hahnel; Andreas König; Eugenio Brambilla
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces.

Authors:  Stefan Roehling; Monika Astasov-Frauenhoffer; Irmgard Hauser-Gerspach; Olivier Braissant; Henriette Woelfler; Tuomas Waltimo; Heinz Kniha; Michael Gahlert
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Fracture load and failure types of different veneered polyetheretherketone fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Simon Taufall; Marlis Eichberger; Patrick R Schmidlin; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A potential application of materials based on a polymer and CAD/CAM composite resins in prosthetic dentistry.

Authors:  Milica Jovanović; Miloš Živić; Marko Milosavljević
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 4.642

Review 9.  Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics.

Authors:  Shariq Najeeb; Muhammad S Zafar; Zohaib Khurshid; Fahad Siddiqui
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.642

10.  Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Philipp Schmid; Malgorzata Roos; Marlis Eichberger; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  PEEK in Fixed Dental Prostheses: Application and Adhesion Improvement.

Authors:  Biyao Wang; Minghao Huang; Pengrui Dang; Jiahui Xie; Xinwen Zhang; Xu Yan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  A Comparative Evaluation of the Radiopacity of Contemporary Restorative CAD/CAM Blocks Using Digital Radiography Based on the Impact of Material Composition.

Authors:  Nahla Gamal Elhelbawy; Rehab F Ghouraba; Fatma A Hasaneen
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Mechanical Response of PEKK and PEEK As Frameworks for Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Regina Furbino Villefort; Pedro Jacy Santos Diamantino; Sandra Lúcia Ventorin von Zeidler; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Laís Regiane Silva-Concílio; Guilherme deSiqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra; João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-09-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.