Literature DB >> 33300950

Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Using Lower Dosage and Higher Frequency vs Observation on Disease-Free Survival Among Patients With Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Had Received Standard Treatment: The SYSUCC-001 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xi Wang1, Shu-Sen Wang2, Heng Huang3, Li Cai4, Li Zhao5, Rou-Jun Peng6, Ying Lin7, Jun Tang1, Jian Zeng8, Le-Hong Zhang9, Yong-Li Ke10, Xian-Ming Wang11, Xin-Mei Liu12, Qian-Jun Chen13, An-Qin Zhang14, Fei Xu2, Xi-Wen Bi2, Jia-Jia Huang2, Ji-Bin Li15, Dan-Mei Pang16, Cong Xue2, Yan-Xia Shi2, Zhen-Yu He17, Huan-Xin Lin17, Xin An2, Wen Xia2, Ye Cao15, Ying Guo15, Yan-Hong Su18, Xin Hua2, Xin-Yue Wang2, Ruo-Xi Hong2, Kui-Kui Jiang2, Chen-Ge Song2, Zhang-Zan Huang2, Wei Shi19, Yong-Yi Zhong2, Zhong-Yu Yuan2.   

Abstract

Importance: Among all subtypes of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer has a relatively high relapse rate and poor outcome after standard treatment. Effective strategies to reduce the risk of relapse and death are needed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of low-dose capecitabine maintenance after standard adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 13 academic centers and clinical sites in China from April 2010 to December 2016 and final date of follow-up was April 30, 2020. Patients (n = 443) had early-stage triple-negative breast cancer and had completed standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine (n = 222) at a dose of 650 mg/m2 twice a day by mouth for 1 year without interruption or to observation (n = 221) after completion of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included distant disease-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and adverse events.
Results: Among 443 women who were randomized, 434 were included in the full analysis set (mean [SD] age, 46 [9.9] years; T1/T2 stage, 93.1%; node-negative, 61.8%) (98.0% completed the trial). After a median follow-up of 61 months (interquartile range, 44-82), 94 events were observed, including 38 events (37 recurrences and 32 deaths) in the capecitabine group and 56 events (56 recurrences and 40 deaths) in the observation group. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival was 82.8% in the capecitabine group and 73.0% in the observation group (hazard ratio [HR] for risk of recurrence or death, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.95]; P = .03). In the capecitabine group vs the observation group, the estimated 5-year distant disease-free survival was 85.8% vs 75.8% (HR for risk of distant metastasis or death, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.38-0.92]; P = .02), the estimated 5-year overall survival was 85.5% vs 81.3% (HR for risk of death, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.47-1.19]; P = .22), and the estimated 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival was 85.0% vs 80.8% (HR for risk of locoregional recurrence or death, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.46-1.13]; P = .15). The most common capecitabine-related adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (45.2%), with 7.7% of patients experiencing a grade 3 event. Conclusions and Relevance: Among women with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who received standard adjuvant treatment, low-dose capecitabine maintenance therapy for 1 year, compared with observation, resulted in significantly improved 5-year disease-free survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01112826.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33300950      PMCID: PMC7729589          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.23370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Ian E Smith; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Capecitabine for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer: efficacy, safety and ethnicity.

Authors:  Y Ma; L Tang; H-X Wang; Y-C Xu; Y Ma; F-C Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Safety and efficacy study of metronomic vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide plus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer: A phase II trial.

Authors:  Emilia Montagna; Antonella Palazzo; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Cancello; Monica Iorfida; Angela Sciandivasci; Angela Esposito; Anna Cardillo; Manuelita Mazza; Elisabetta Munzone; Antonella Lai; Aron Goldhirsch; Marco Colleoni
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  Capecitabine versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin R Stockler; Vernon J Harvey; Prudence A Francis; Michael J Byrne; Stephen P Ackland; Bernie Fitzharris; Guy Van Hazel; Nicholas R C Wilcken; Peter S Grimison; Anna K Nowak; M Corona Gainford; Akiko Fong; Lisa Paksec; Tatiana Sourjina; Diana Zannino; Val Gebski; R John Simes; John F Forbes; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Estimating the benefits of therapy for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2019.

Authors:  H J Burstein; G Curigliano; S Loibl; P Dubsky; M Gnant; P Poortmans; M Colleoni; C Denkert; M Piccart-Gebhart; M Regan; H-J Senn; E P Winer; B Thurlimann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Potential regional differences for the tolerability profiles of fluoropyrimidines.

Authors:  Daniel G Haller; Jim Cassidy; Stephen J Clarke; David Cunningham; Eric Van Cutsem; Paulo M Hoff; Mace L Rothenberg; Leonard B Saltz; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Carmen Allegra; Joseph R Bertino; Jean-Yves Douillard; Bengt G Gustavsson; Gerard Milano; Michael O'Connell; Youcef Rustum; Josep Tabernero; Frank Gilberg; Florin Sirzén; Chris Twelves
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Dent; Wedad M Hanna; Maureen Trudeau; Ellen Rawlinson; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Cem Simsek; Ece Esin; Suayib Yalcin
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine After Standard Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01).

Authors:  Ana Lluch; Carlos H Barrios; Laura Torrecillas; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Jose Bines; Jose Segalla; Ángel Guerrero-Zotano; Jose A García-Sáenz; Roberto Torres; Juan de la Haba; Elena García-Martínez; Henry L Gómez; Antonio Llombart; Javier Salvador Bofill; José M Baena-Cañada; Agustí Barnadas; Lourdes Calvo; Laura Pérez-Michel; Manuel Ramos; Isaura Fernández; Álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure; Jesús Cárdenas; Jeferson Vinholes; Eduardo Martínez de Dueñas; Maria J Godes; Miguel A Seguí; Antonio Antón; Pilar López-Álvarez; Jorge Moncayo; Gilberto Amorim; Esther Villar; Salvador Reyes; Carlos Sampaio; Bernardita Cardemil; Maria J Escudero; Susana Bezares; Eva Carrasco; Miguel Martín
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  34 in total

1.  Maintenance therapy improves the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma responding to first-line chemotherapy: a multicentre, randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Haixin Huang; Hui Yang; Xiaohua Hu; Meilian Liu; Changjie Huang; Xianbin Feng; Xishan Chen; Zhou Jiang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  Wilms tumor 1 associated protein promotes epithelial mesenchymal transition of gastric cancer cells by accelerating TGF-β and enhances chemoradiotherapy resistance.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Mingxu Da
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.322

3.  A Novel Matrisomal-Related LncRNA Signature Associated With Survival Outcome and Immune Evasion in Patients With Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yuan Yang; Li Shi; Jun Zhang; Ya Zheng; Guozhi Wu; Jie Sun; Min Liu; Zhaofeng Chen; Yuping Wang; Rui Ji; Qinghong Guo; Yongning Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs Best Supportive Care Alone on Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Who Had Received Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Guo-Ying Liu; Wang-Zhong Li; De-Shen Wang; Hu Liang; Xing Lv; Yan-Fang Ye; Chong Zhao; Liang-Ru Ke; Shu-Hui Lv; Nian Lu; Wei-Xin Bei; Zhuo-Chen Cai; Xi Chen; Chi-Xiong Liang; Xiang Guo; Wei-Xiong Xia; Yan-Qun Xiang
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 33.006

Review 5.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2021.

Authors:  Nina Ditsch; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Michael Friedrich; Christian Jackisch; Ute-Susann Albert; Maggie Banys-Paluchowski; Ingo Bauerfeind; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Wilfried Budach; Peter Dall; Eva M Fallenberg; Peter A Fasching; Tanja Fehm; Bernd Gerber; Oleg Gluz; Nadia Harbeck; Jörg Heil; Jens Huober; Hans-Heinrich Kreipe; David Krug; Thorsten Kühn; Sherko Kümmel; Sibylle Loibl; Diana Lüftner; Michael P Lux; Nicolai Maass; Christoph Mundhenke; Ulrike Nitz; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Toralf Reimer; Kerstin Rhiem; Achim Rody; Marcus Schmidt; Andreas Schneeweiss; Florian Schütz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Christine Solbach; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Elmar Stickeler; Christoph Thomssen; Michael Untch; Isabell Witzel; Achim Wöckel; Volkmar Müller; Wolfgang Janni; Marc Thill
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.268

6.  MCPIP1-mediated NFIC alternative splicing inhibits proliferation of triple-negative breast cancer via cyclin D1-Rb-E2F1 axis.

Authors:  Fengxia Chen; Qingqing Wang; Xiaoyan Yu; Ningning Yang; Yuan Wang; Yangyang Zeng; Zhewen Zheng; Fuxiang Zhou; Yunfeng Zhou
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Targeting nucleotide metabolism enhances the efficacy of anthracyclines and anti-metabolites in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Ladner; Melissa J LaBonte; Craig Davison; Roisin Morelli; Catherine Knowlson; Melanie McKechnie; Robbie Carson; Xanthi Stachtea; Kylie A McLaughlin; Vivien E Prise; Kienan Savage; Richard H Wilson; Karl A Mulligan; Peter M Wilson
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-04-06

8.  Bevacizumab Plays a double-edged role in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Non-metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  XinJie Chen; Yu Gao; GanLin Zhang; BingXue Li; TingTing Ma; YunFei Ma; XiaoMin Wang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 9.  Optimal Management for Residual Disease Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Julia Foldi; Mariya Rozenblit; Tristen S Park; Christin A Knowlton; Mehra Golshan; Meena Moran; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-02

Review 10.  Therapeutic Strategies for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: From Negative to Positive.

Authors:  Dey Nandini; Aske Jennifer
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.