| Literature DB >> 33299708 |
Shannon M Malloy1, Wouter J Dronkers1,2, Joseph M Firriolo1, Laura C Nuzzi1, Maarten J Koudstaal2,3,4, Bonnie L Padwa1,5, Amir H Taghinia1, Brian I Labow1.
Abstract
The etiology and treatment of complex mandibular defects in children differ markedly from those of adults, although treatment with free bone flaps is historical in both groups. While adult outcomes and complication rates are well known, few pediatric data exist, especially for patients with congenital deficiencies. This study reports early and late outcomes from a cohort of young, primarily syndromic patients undergoing microvascular mandibular reconstruction.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33299708 PMCID: PMC7722618 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ISSN: 2169-7574
Patient Characteristics
| Patient | Gender | Primary Diagnosis | Affected Side | Age at Surgery (y) | Length of Follow-up (y) | Previous Attempted Reconstruction(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | Female | CFM | Left | 8.4 | 12.0 | Costochondral bone graft |
| 1B | Female | Non-union after late distraction | Left | 18.1 | 2.2 | Costochondral bone graft, free fibula flap |
| 2 | Male | CFM | Left | 12.8 | 8.5 | — |
| 3 | Female | CFM | Right | 6.3 | 3.2 | — |
| 4 | Female | CFM | Right | 9.5 | 7.9 | — |
| 5 | Female | CFM | Right | 5.9 | 7.7 | Costochondral bone graft (2) |
| 6 | Male | Ewing sarcoma | Right | 11.3 | 4.9 | — |
| 7 | Female | CFM | Left | 7.7 | 8.6 | — |
| 8 | Female | CFM | Left | 18.9 | 7.8 | Iliac crest bone graft |
| 9 | Male | CFM | Left | 21.4 | 2.1 | Costochondral bone graft |
| 10 | Female | CFM | Right | 14.7 | 3.8 | Costochondral bone grafts (2), iliac crest bone graft (2) |
| 11 | Male | CFM | Right | 16.8 | 2.3 | Costochondral bone graft |
| 12 | Male | Ewing sarcoma | Left | 1.9 | 10.0 | — |
| 13 | Female | Osteosarcoma | Right | 10.5 | 3.1 | — |
1A refers to the first free bone flap transfer; 1B refers to this patient’s second bone flap transfer.
CFM, craniofacial microsomia.
Operative Details
| Patient | Extent of Defect | Affected Side | Surgical Approach | Type of Bone Flap | Length of Bone Flap (cm) | Donor Vessel | Recipient Vessel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A | Ramus-condyle unit | Left | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 8.0 | FA | EJV |
| 1B | Hemimandible | Left | Submandibular incisions | Medial femoral condyle, osseous | 4.5 | STA | EJV |
| 2 | Ramus-condyle unit | Left | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 11.0 | EC | IJV |
| 3 | Ramus-condyle unit | Right | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 9.0 | EC | EJV |
| 4 | Ramus-condyle unit | Right | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 10.0 | STA | FV |
| 5 | Ramus-condyle unit | Right | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 10.0 | FA | EJV |
| 6 | Hemimandible | Right | Open | Fibula, osteocutaneous | 7.0 | FA | FV |
| 7 | Ramus-condyle unit | Left | Tunnel | Fibula, osteocutaneous | 10.0 | STA | FV & EJV |
| 8 | Ramus-condyle unit | Left | Tunnel | Fibula, osteocutaneous | 11.0 | STA | IJV |
| 9 | Ramus-condyle unit | Left | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 11.0 | EC | EJV |
| 10 | Ramus-body | Right | Tunnel | Fibula, osseous | 8.0 | LA | EJV |
| 11 | Ramus-body | Right | Tunnel | Fibula, osteocutaneous | 6.0 | EC | EJV |
| 12 | Hemimandible | Left | Open | Fibula, osseous | 4.0 | FA | EJV |
| 13 | Hemimandible | Right | Open | Fibula, osteocutaneous | 14.0 | STA | IJV & EJV |
EC, external carotid artery; EJV, external jugular vein; FA, facial artery; FV, facial vein; IJV, internal jugular vein; LA, lingual artery; STA, superficial temporal artery.
Fig. 1.Patient with Ewing sarcoma following resection. (A) The intact glenoid cartilage is seen in the deepest part of the wound, and the buccal fat pad is held cranially by forceps. Stay sutures in the ptyregoid musculature were used to stabilize the flap following inset. The double approximating clamp holds a potential donor vessel. (B) Resected mandible specimen with clear margins.
Fig. 4.Postoperative photographs of a pediatric patient. Patient outcome 2 weeks (A) and 6 years (B) after surgery.
Patient Outcomes
| Outcome | Patient Incidence (n) |
|---|---|
| Short-term (within postoperative year) | |
| Transient facial paresis | 31% (4) |
| Surgical site infection | 23% (3) |
| Bone non-union | 7% (1) |
| Open wound | 7% (1) |
| Soft-tissue loss requiring debridement and closure | 7% (1) |
| Long-term (>postoperative year) | |
| Flap survival | 100% (13) |
| TMJ ankylosis | 38% (5) |
| Chronic pain | 7% (1) |
| Chronic neck wound | 7% (1) |
| Bone non-union | 7% (1) |
| Donor site morbidity | 7% (1) |
Fig. 5.Malocclusion and correction. Left column, Preoperative photographs demonstrating malocclusion of a patient with CFM. Right column, Postoperative scan images with reconstructed mandible and orthodontics showing improved occlusion.
Fig. 6.CFM patient undergoing mandibular reconstruction. (A) Preoperative 3D CT scan image of an adult male patient with CFM. (B) Proposed fibula placement. (C,D) Postoperative scan images showing the newly reconstructed mandible. (E) Preoperative photograph of the patient. (F) Postoperative results.