Literature DB >> 11115284

The fibula osteocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction: a critical evaluation of donor site morbidity.

M Shindo1, B P Fong, G F Funk, L H Karnell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To (1) compare the complications and functional outcome of primary closure vs split-thickness skin grafting of the fibula osteocutaneous flap donor site, (2) identify patient-mix or treatment factors related to donor site complications, and (3) address early detection and management of donor site complications.
DESIGN: Retrospective review and questionnaire study.
SETTING: Two university tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Fifty-three patients (31 men and 22 women, ages 20 to 80 years) who underwent fibula osteocutaneous free tissue transfer between February 1992 and January 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Minor complications; major complications; and postoperative function, including sensory and motor deficits, pain, swelling, temperature intolerance, and activities of daily living.
RESULTS: Four patients developed major wound complications (group 1), 11 patients developed minor wound complications (group 2), and 38 patients had no wound complications (group 3). The donor site was closed primarily in 26 patients and with a split-thickness skin graft in the remaining 27 patients. Major wound complications developed in 3 patients (12%) who underwent primary closure and 1 patient (4%) who underwent split-thickness skin grafting. Minor wound complications developed in 7 (27%) of the patients who underwent primary closure and 4 patients (15%) who underwent split-thickness skin grafting. Three patients who had major complications had residual sensory or motor deficits that resulted in impaired gait or alteration in their daily activities. Comparing all patients with complications (groups 1 and 2) to patients with no complications (group 3) demonstrated an increased incidence of donor site complications in heavy smokers (P<.05) and a strong trend toward higher donor site complications in patients who underwent primary closure (P =.10). Although trends were identified, no significant differences were found in age, comorbid illnesses, alcohol use, preoperative laboratory values, operating time, tourniquet time, or skin paddle width.
CONCLUSIONS: A variety of patient-mix and operative factors are likely related to the development of donor site wound complications. Width of the skin paddle alone is not a reliable criterion for determining the need to skin graft the donor site. Primary closure tended to result in a higher rate of both major and minor wound complications compared with split-thickness skin grafting. Primary closure of fibula donor site defects should be undertaken if this can be accomplished with no tension along the suture line. If tension at the suture line is present, a skin graft should be strongly considered to minimize the possibility of a wound complication. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1467-1472

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11115284     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.126.12.1467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Free fibula transfer. Analysis of 76 consecutive microsurgical procedures and review of the literature].

Authors:  D Erdmann; G A Giessler; G E O Bergquist; W Bruno; H Young; C Heitmann; L S Levin
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Comparison between primary closure and skin grafts of the free fibula osteocutaneous flap donor site.

Authors:  Masaya Akashi; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Hiroyuki Takasu; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Junya Kusumoto; Akiko Sakakibara; Takumi Hasegawa; Tsutomu Minamikawa; Takahide Komori
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-23

3.  Head and Neck Wound Reconstruction Using Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix Versus Collagen-Chondroitin Silicone Bilayer.

Authors:  Shannon S Wu; Michael Wells; Mona Ascha; Radhika Duggal; James Gatherwright; Kyle Chepla
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  Outcomes following Microvascular Mandibular Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults.

Authors:  Shannon M Malloy; Wouter J Dronkers; Joseph M Firriolo; Laura C Nuzzi; Maarten J Koudstaal; Bonnie L Padwa; Amir H Taghinia; Brian I Labow
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-11-30

5.  Association of Bolster Duration With Uptake Rates of Fibula Donor Site Skin Grafts.

Authors:  Abel P David; Chase Heaton; Andrea Park; Rahul Seth; P Daniel Knott; Jeffrey D Markey
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  A case of nonisland pedicled foot fillet flap for below-knee amputation stump wound: treatment option for compartment syndrome after fibular free flap surgery.

Authors:  Jae Ha Hwang; Kwang Seog Kim; Sam Yong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Anatomical examination of the fibula: digital imaging study for osseointegrated implant installation.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ide; Satoru Matsunaga; Jeffrey Harris; Daniel O' Connell; Hadi Seikaly; Johan Wolfaardt
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-02-03

8.  Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options.

Authors:  Marie Kearns; Panagiotis Ermogenous; Simon Myers; Ali Mahmoud Ghanem
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-11-15

9.  Reconstruction of mandibular defects using vascularized fibular osteomyocutaneous flap combined with nonvascularized fibular flap.

Authors:  W Wang; J Zhu; B Xu; B Xia; Y Liu; S Shao
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2019-09-01

10.  Impact of Periosteal Branches and Septo-Cutaneous Perforators on Free Fibula Flap Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Angiography Scans in Virtual Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Anna Katrin Baumgart; Christina Bäcker; Christian Adelung; Fritz Roller; Daniel Schmermund; Sebastian Böttger; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sameh Attia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.