Shyam Prabhakaran1, Steven R Messé1, Dawn Kleindorfer1, Eric E Smith1, Gregg C Fonarow1, Haolin Xu1, Xin Zhao1, Barbara Lytle1, Joaquin Cigarroa1, Lee H Schwamm1. 1. University of Chicago (SP), Pritzker School of Medicine; University of Pennsylvania (SRM); University of Cincinnati (DK); Hotchkiss Brain Institute (EES), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Ahmanson Cardiomyopathy Center (GCF), UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Duke Clinical Research Institute (HX, XZ, BL), Durham, NC; Knight Cardiovascular Institute (JC), Oregon Health and Sciences University; and Department of Neurology (LHS), Massachusetts General Hospital.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nationwide data on patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) are lacking. We evaluated patient and hospital characteristics, in-hospital treatments, and discharge outcomes among patients with CS compared with other subtypes in the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke registry. METHODS: We identified patients with ischemic stroke (IS) admitted to GWTG-Stroke participating hospitals between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017, with documented National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scale and stroke etiology (cardioembolic [CE], large artery atherosclerosis [LAA], small vessel occlusion [SVO], other determined etiology [OTH], or CS). Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared hospital treatments and discharge outcomes by subtype, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 316,623 patients from 1,687 hospitals, there were 63,301 (20.0%) patients with CS. In multivariable analysis, patients with CS received IV thrombolysis more often than other subtypes and had lower mortality than CE, LAA, and OTH but higher mortality than SVO. They were more likely to be discharged home than all other subtypes and be independent at discharge than LAA, OTH, or SVO. CONCLUSIONS: In a large contemporary nationwide registry, CS accounted for 20% of ISs among patients with a documented stroke etiology. Patients with CS had a distinct profile of treatments and outcomes relative to other subtypes. Improved subtype documentation and further research into CS are warranted to improve care and outcomes for patients with stroke.
BACKGROUND: Nationwide data on patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) are lacking. We evaluated patient and hospital characteristics, in-hospital treatments, and discharge outcomes among patients with CS compared with other subtypes in the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG)-Stroke registry. METHODS: We identified patients with ischemic stroke (IS) admitted to GWTG-Stroke participating hospitals between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017, with documented National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scale and stroke etiology (cardioembolic [CE], large artery atherosclerosis [LAA], small vessel occlusion [SVO], other determined etiology [OTH], or CS). Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared hospital treatments and discharge outcomes by subtype, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Among 316,623 patients from 1,687 hospitals, there were 63,301 (20.0%) patients with CS. In multivariable analysis, patients with CS received IV thrombolysis more often than other subtypes and had lower mortality than CE, LAA, and OTH but higher mortality than SVO. They were more likely to be discharged home than all other subtypes and be independent at discharge than LAA, OTH, or SVO. CONCLUSIONS: In a large contemporary nationwide registry, CS accounted for 20% of ISs among patients with a documented stroke etiology. Patients with CS had a distinct profile of treatments and outcomes relative to other subtypes. Improved subtype documentation and further research into CS are warranted to improve care and outcomes for patients with stroke.
Authors: Michael Marnane; Caroline A Duggan; Orla C Sheehan; Aine Merwick; Niamh Hannon; Denis Curtin; Dawn Harris; Emma B Williams; Gillian Horgan; Lorraine Kyne; Patricia M E McCormack; Joseph Duggan; Alan Moore; Gloria Crispino-O'Connell; Peter J Kelly Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: D Woo; J Gebel; R Miller; R Kothari; T Brott; J Khoury; S Salisbury; R Shukla; A Pancioli; E Jauch; J Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A J Grau; C Weimar; F Buggle; A Heinrich; M Goertler; S Neumaier; J Glahn; T Brandt; W Hacke; H C Diener Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Hakan Ay; Thomas Benner; E Murat Arsava; Karen L Furie; Aneesh B Singhal; Matt B Jensen; Cenk Ayata; Amytis Towfighi; Eric E Smith; Ji Y Chong; Walter J Koroshetz; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jukka Putaala; Antti J Metso; Tiina M Metso; Nina Konkola; Yvonn Kraemer; Elena Haapaniemi; Markku Kaste; Turgut Tatlisumak Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Linxin Li; Gabriel S Yiin; Olivia C Geraghty; Ursula G Schulz; Wilhelm Kuker; Ziyah Mehta; Peter M Rothwell Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 59.935