Literature DB >> 28689236

Etiological classification of ischemic stroke in young patients: a comparative study of TOAST, CCS, and ASCO.

Elif Gökçal1, Elvin Niftaliyev2, Talip Asil2.   

Abstract

Analysis of stroke subtypes is important for making treatment decisions and prognostic evaluations. The TOAST classification system is most commonly used, but the CCS and ASCO classification systems might be more useful to identify stroke etiologies in young patients whose strokes have a wide range of different causes. In this manuscript, we aim to compare the differences in subtype classification between TOAST, CCS, and ASCO in young stroke patients. The TOAST, CCS, and ASCO classification schemes were applied to 151 patients with ischemic stroke aged 18-49 years old and the proportion of subtypes classified by each scheme was compared. For comparison, determined etiologies were defined as cases with evident and probable subtypes when using the CCS scheme and cases with grade 1 and 2 subtypes but no other grade 1 subtype when using the ASCO scheme. The McNemar test with Bonferroni correction was used to assess significance. By TOAST, 41.1% of patients' stroke etiology was classified as undetermined etiology, 19.2% as cardioembolic, 13.2% as large artery atherosclerosis, 11.3% as small vessel occlusion, and 15.2% as other causes. Compared with TOAST, both CCS and ASCO assigned fewer patients to the undetermined etiology group (30.5% p < 0.001 and 26.5% p < 0.001, respectively) and assigned more patients to the small vessel occlusion category (19.9%, p < 0.001, and 21.9%, p < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, both schemes assigned more patients to the large artery atherosclerosis group (15.9 and 16.6%, respectively). The proportion of patients assigned to either the cardioembolic or the other causes etiology did not differ significantly between the three schemes. Application of the CCS and ASCO classification schemes in young stroke patients seems feasible, and using both schemes may result in fewer patients being classified as undetermined etiology. New studies with more patients and a prospective design are needed to explore this topic further.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Young ischemic stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28689236     DOI: 10.1007/s13760-017-0813-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg        ISSN: 0300-9009            Impact factor:   2.396


  5 in total

1.  Cryptogenic stroke: Contemporary trends, treatments, and outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Steven R Messé; Dawn Kleindorfer; Eric E Smith; Gregg C Fonarow; Haolin Xu; Xin Zhao; Barbara Lytle; Joaquin Cigarroa; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2020-10

2.  Estonian young stroke registry: High burden of risk factors and high prevalence of cardiomebolic and large-artery stroke.

Authors:  Riina Vibo; Siim Schneider; Liisa Kõrv; Sandra Mallene; Liisi-Anette Torop; Janika Kõrv
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 3.  Point-of-Care-Testing in Acute Stroke Management: An Unmet Need Ripe for Technological Harvest.

Authors:  Dorin Harpaz; Evgeni Eltzov; Raymond C S Seet; Robert S Marks; Alfred I Y Tok
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 4.  Stroke in young adults: Current trends, opportunities for prevention and pathways forward.

Authors:  Tamer Yahya; Mohammad Hashim Jilani; Safi U Khan; Reed Mszar; Syed Zawahir Hassan; Michael J Blaha; Ron Blankstein; Salim S Virani; Michelle C Johansen; Farhaan Vahidy; Miguel Cainzos-Achirica; Khurram Nasir
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-09

5.  Fasting Blood-Glucose Level and Clinical Outcome in Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke of Different Age Groups After Endovascular Treatment.

Authors:  Lili Yuan; Yi Sun; Xianjun Huang; Xiangjun Xu; Junfeng Xu; Youqing Xu; Qian Yang; Yujuan Zhu; Zhiming Zhou
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.