Cameron J Gettel1, Maureen E Canavan2, Gail D'Onofrio3, Brendan G Carr4, Arjun K Venkatesh5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: cameron.gettel@yale.edu. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Outcomes and Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: maureen.canavan@yale.edu. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: gail.donofrio@yale.edu. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: brendan.carr@mountsinai.org. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: arjun.venkatesh@yale.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinician expertise has been associated with improved patient outcomes, yet ED clinicians often work in various clinical settings beyond the ED and, therefore, may risk expertise by having less clinical focus. We sought to describe clinical focus among the emergency care workforce nationally. METHODS: Using the 2017 Medicare Public Use Files (PUF), we performed a cross-sectional analysis of clinicians receiving reimbursement for emergency care Evaluation & Management (E/M) services from Medicare fee-for-service Part B. Clinicians were categorized by type as EM physicians, non-EM physicians, and advanced practice providers (APPs). The primary outcome was the clinical focus of the individual clinician, defined as the proportion of E/M services within the ED setting relative to a clinician's total E/M services across all practice settings. RESULTS: Of 65,710 unique clinicians providing care to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the ED setting, 39,016 (59.4%) were classified as EM physicians, 8123 (12.4%) as non-EM physicians, and 18,571 (28.5%) as APPs. The individual clinician median focus was 92.8% (interquartile range [IQR]: 87.0, 100.0) for EM physicians, 45.2% (IQR: 5.1, 97.0) for non-EM physicians, and 100.0% (IQR: 96.3, 100.0) for APPs. CONCLUSION: EM physicians have twice as much clinical focus in comparison to non-EM physicians providing emergency care to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. These findings underscore the importance of diverse training and certification programs to ensure access to clinically focused ED clinicians.
OBJECTIVE: Clinician expertise has been associated with improved patient outcomes, yet ED clinicians often work in various clinical settings beyond the ED and, therefore, may risk expertise by having less clinical focus. We sought to describe clinical focus among the emergency care workforce nationally. METHODS: Using the 2017 Medicare Public Use Files (PUF), we performed a cross-sectional analysis of clinicians receiving reimbursement for emergency care Evaluation & Management (E/M) services from Medicare fee-for-service Part B. Clinicians were categorized by type as EM physicians, non-EM physicians, and advanced practice providers (APPs). The primary outcome was the clinical focus of the individual clinician, defined as the proportion of E/M services within the ED setting relative to a clinician's total E/M services across all practice settings. RESULTS: Of 65,710 unique clinicians providing care to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in the ED setting, 39,016 (59.4%) were classified as EM physicians, 8123 (12.4%) as non-EM physicians, and 18,571 (28.5%) as APPs. The individual clinician median focus was 92.8% (interquartile range [IQR]: 87.0, 100.0) for EM physicians, 45.2% (IQR: 5.1, 97.0) for non-EM physicians, and 100.0% (IQR: 96.3, 100.0) for APPs. CONCLUSION: EM physicians have twice as much clinical focus in comparison to non-EM physicians providing emergency care to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. These findings underscore the importance of diverse training and certification programs to ensure access to clinically focused ED clinicians.
Authors: Joseph S Ross; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Yun Wang; Dennis T Ko; Jersey Chen; Elizabeth E Drye; Patricia S Keenan; Judith H Lichtman; Héctor Bueno; Geoffrey C Schreiner; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carlos A Camargo; Adit A Ginde; Ayellet H Singer; Janice A Espinola; Ashley F Sullivan; John F Pearson; Adam J Singer Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: M Kennedy Hall; Kevin Burns; Michael Carius; Mitchel Erickson; Jane Hall; Arjun Venkatesh Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; D Mark Courtney; Alexander T Janke; Craig Rothenberg; Angela M Mills; Wendy Sun; Arjun K Venkatesh Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 6.762