Literature DB >> 18945242

Assessment of emergency physician workforce needs in the United States, 2005.

Carlos A Camargo1, Adit A Ginde, Ayellet H Singer, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, John F Pearson, Adam J Singer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to estimate emergency physician (EP) workforce needs, taking into account the diversity of U.S. emergency departments (EDs) and various projections of EP supply and demand.
METHODS: The 2005 National ED Inventory-USA (http://www.emnet-usa.org/) provided annual visit volumes for 4,828 U.S. EDs. The authors calculated annual supply based on existing emergency medicine (EM) board-certified EPs, adding newly board-certified EPs, and subtracting board-certified EPs who died or retired. Demand was estimated at each ED by dividing the number of visits by the average EP volume (based on 2.8 patients/hour, 40 hours/week, and 34% nonclinical time). The models assumed that at least 1 EP should be present 24/7 in each ED, which would require at least 5.35 full-time equivalents (FTEs) per ED. Based on annual EP attrition estimates, results for best-case, worst-case, and intermediate scenarios were calculated.
RESULTS: In 2005, there were approximately 22,000 EM board-certified EPs, but 40,030 EPs would be needed to staff all 4,828 EDs (55% of demand met). A total of 2,492 (52%) EDs had a visit volume that required the minimum number (5.35) FTEs, of which 47% were rural. In the unrealistic (no attrition), best-case scenario, it would take until 2019 to staff all EDs with board-certified EPs. In the worst-case scenario (12% attrition), supply would never meet demand. Our intermediate scenario (2.5% attrition) suggested that board-certified EPs would satisfy workforce needs in 2038.
CONCLUSIONS: Supply of EM residency-trained, board-certified EPs is not likely to meet demand in the near future. Alternative EP staffing arrangements merit further consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18945242     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  Quantifying the Impact of Trainee Providers on Outpatient Clinic Workflow using Secondary EHR Data.

Authors:  Isaac H Goldstein; Michelle R Hribar; Read-Brown Sarah; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Safety in numbers: are major cities the safest places in the United States?

Authors:  Sage R Myers; Charles C Branas; Benjamin C French; Michael L Nance; Michael J Kallan; Douglas J Wiebe; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Who provides what care? An analysis of clinical focus among the national emergency care workforce.

Authors:  Cameron J Gettel; Maureen E Canavan; Gail D'Onofrio; Brendan G Carr; Arjun K Venkatesh
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Continued rise in the use of mid-level providers in US emergency departments, 1993-2009.

Authors:  David F M Brown; Ashley F Sullivan; Janice A Espinola; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-23

5.  Variable access to immediate bedside ultrasound in the emergency department.

Authors:  Brad E Talley; Adit A Ginde; Ali S Raja; Ashley F Sullivan; Janice A Espinola; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-02

6.  A study of the workforce in emergency medicine in Israel 2012: what has changed in the last decade?

Authors:  Michael J Drescher; Zev Wimpfheimer; Aziz Darawsha; Ryan Sullivan; Aviva Goral; Limor Aharonson-Daniel
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.