| Literature DB >> 33293605 |
Yu Tian1, Cong Wang2, Weiming Yue3, Ming Lu4,5, Hui Tian3.
Abstract
The resection of nodules by thoracoscopic surgery is difficult because the nodules may be hard to identify. Preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules is widely used in the clinic. In this study, we retrospectively compared CT-guided hook wire localization and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) localization of small pulmonary nodules before resection. Patients who underwent localization with CT-guided hook wire or ENB followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Clinical parameters, complication and failure rate, and localization time were compared between two groups. A total of 157 patients underwent the localization procedure successfully. Pulmonary nodules were localized by CT-guided hook wire in 105 patients and by ENB in 52 patients. The nodule size in ENB group was smaller than that in CT-guided localization group (P < 0.001). Both CT-guided localization and ENB localization were well tolerated in all patients, while ENB localization leaded to less complications (P = 0.0058). In CT-guided localization group, 6 patients failed to be located while none failed in ENB group (P = 0.079). The procedure time was 15.15 ± 3.70 min for CT-guided localization and 21.29 ± 4.00 min for ENB localization (P < 0.001). CT-guided localization is simple and feasible for uncertain pulmonary nodules before surgery. ENB localization could identify small lung nodules with high accuracy and achieve lower incidence of complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33293605 PMCID: PMC7723056 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78146-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Coronal localization by CT and Sagittal marking with steel needles. (B) The picture of steel needle. (C) Measuring the distance of puncture point and locating the distance between steel needle and puncture point in coronal position of CT image. (D) The results of puncture were confirmed by CT and the complications were detected.
Figure 2(A) A small pulmonary nodule is located in the right upper lobe. (B) Before operation, magnetic navigation software was used to design magnetic navigation localization path. (C) According to the designed path, the magnetic navigation probe was stained with methylene blue after reaching the lesion location. (D) The accuracy of localization was verified after thoracoscopic surgery.
Clinical characteristics and demographics of two localization groups.
| Variables | CT-guided hook wire localization | ENB localization | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.459 | ||
| ≥ 60 years old | 51 | 22 | |
| < 60 years old | 54 | 30 | |
| Gender | 0.527 | ||
| Male | 57 | 31 | |
| Female | 48 | 21 | |
| Smoking | 0.116 | ||
| No | 46 | 16 | |
| Yes | 59 | 36 | |
| Location | 0.066 | ||
| RUL | 44 | 14 | |
| RML | 11 | 6 | |
| RLL | 20 | 20 | |
| LUL | 13 | 3 | |
| LLL | 17 | 9 | |
| Nodule size | < 0.001 | ||
| < 6 mm | 8 | 11 | |
| 6–8 mm | 43 | 38 | |
| 8–10 mm | 54 | 3 | |
| Nodule depth | 0.007 | ||
| 0 cm | 3 | 0 | |
| 0–3 cm | 61 | 43 | |
| > 3 cm | 41 | 9 | |
| Nodule density | 0.567 | ||
| Pure GGO | 47 | 27 | |
| > 50% GGO | 45 | 21 | |
| < 50% GGO | 13 | 4 | |
| Pathological diagnosis | 0.117 | ||
| Benign | 15 | 14 | |
| AIS | 50 | 26 | |
| MIA | 33 | 11 | |
| IA | 7 | 1 |
*Chi-square test.
Figure 3Characteristics of pulmonary nodular lesion in two localization groups. (A) Nodule depth. (B) Nodule size. (C) Localization time.
Localization and surgery results in the ENB and CT groups.
| Variables | CT-Guided Localization | ENB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complications | 0.0058 | ||
| No complications | 91 | 52 | |
| With complications | 14 | 0 | |
| Asymptomatic hemopneumothorax | 8 | 0 | |
| Symptomatic hemopneumothorax | 4 | 0 | |
| Hemoptysis | 1 | 0 | |
| Decoupling | 1 | 0 | |
| Failed to localization | 6 | 0 | 0.079 |
| Localization time (min) | 15.15 ± 3.70 | 21.29 ± 4.00 | < 0.001 |
| Hook wire station | – | ||
| Through the nodule | 6 | – | |
| Beside the nodule | 99 | – | |
| Needle-carrying time (min) | 37.12 ± 17.29 | 0 | < 0.001 |
*Chi-square test.