Literature DB >> 33293374

Genomic Characterization of de novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Ana C Garrido-Castro1,2, Liam F Spurr3,4, Melissa E Hughes3, Yvonne Y Li3,4, Andrew D Cherniack3,2,4, Priti Kumari5, Maxwell R Lloyd3, Brittany Bychkovsky3,2, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa3, Simona Di Lascio3, Esha Jain3,4, Janet Files3, Ayesha Mohammed-Abreu3, Max Krevalin3, Colin MacKichan3, William T Barry3,2, Hao Guo3, Daniel Xia2,6, Ethan Cerami5, Barrett J Rollins3,2,7, Laura E MacConaill2,6,8, Neal I Lindeman2,6,8, Ian E Krop3,2, Bruce E Johnson3,2, Nikhil Wagle3,2,4, Eric P Winer3,2, Deborah A Dillon2,6, Nancy U Lin3,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC.
RESULTS: When comparing primary tumors by subtype, MYB amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.0005, q = 0.111). Mutations in KMTD2, SETD2, and PIK3CA were more prevalent, and TP53 and BRCA1 less prevalent, in primary HR+/HER2- tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; P = 0.008, q = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; P = 0.0003, q = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; P = 0.034, q = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC (P = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33293374      PMCID: PMC7887078          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  47 in total

1.  Immortal time bias in observational studies of drug effects.

Authors:  Samy Suissa
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and prognosis in different subtypes of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of 3771 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Carsten Denkert; Gunter von Minckwitz; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Bianca Lederer; Barbara I Heppner; Karsten E Weber; Jan Budczies; Jens Huober; Frederick Klauschen; Jenny Furlanetto; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Thomas Karn; Berit M Pfitzner; Sherko Kümmel; Knut Engels; Andreas Schneeweiss; Arndt Hartmann; Aurelia Noske; Peter A Fasching; Christian Jackisch; Marion van Mackelenbergh; Peter Sinn; Christian Schem; Claus Hanusch; Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Validation of OncoPanel: A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for the Detection of Somatic Variants in Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Garcia; Alissa Minkovsky; Yonghui Jia; Matthew D Ducar; Priyanka Shivdasani; Xin Gong; Azra H Ligon; Lynette M Sholl; Frank C Kuo; Laura E MacConaill; Neal I Lindeman; Fei Dong
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer highlights changes in mutation and signature frequencies.

Authors:  Lindsay Angus; Marcel Smid; Saskia M Wilting; Job van Riet; Arne Van Hoeck; Luan Nguyen; Serena Nik-Zainal; Tessa G Steenbruggen; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Mariette Labots; Johanna M G H van Riel; Haiko J Bloemendal; Neeltje Steeghs; Martijn P Lolkema; Emile E Voest; Harmen J G van de Werken; Agnes Jager; Edwin Cuppen; Stefan Sleijfer; John W M Martens
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Global gene expression profiling reveals a suppressed immune response pathway associated with 3q amplification in squamous carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Yong Zou; Jing Wang; Bing Zhang; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2015-06-14

6.  Mutational Profile of Metastatic Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Celine Lefebvre; Thomas Bachelot; Thomas Filleron; Marion Pedrero; Mario Campone; Jean-Charles Soria; Christophe Massard; Christelle Lévy; Monica Arnedos; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Julie Garrabey; Yannick Boursin; Marc Deloger; Yu Fu; Frédéric Commo; Véronique Scott; Ludovic Lacroix; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Maud Kamal; Véronique Diéras; Anthony Gonçalves; Jean-Marc Ferrerro; Gilles Romieu; Laurence Vanlemmens; Marie-Ange Mouret Reynier; Jean-Christophe Théry; Fanny Le Du; Séverine Guiu; Florence Dalenc; Gilles Clapisson; Hervé Bonnefoi; Marta Jimenez; Christophe Le Tourneau; Fabrice André
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  A 3q gene signature associated with triple negative breast cancer organ specific metastasis and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Heidi Chen; Xiangming Ji; Rosana Eisenberg; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Ingrid A Mayer; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Survival Outcomes by TP53 Mutation Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Xiaofeng Zheng; Maryam Shariati; Senthil Damodaran; Chetna Wathoo; Lauren Brusco; Mehmet Esat Demirhan; Coya Tapia; Agda Karina Eterovic; Reva K Basho; Naoto T Ueno; Filip Janku; Aysegul Sahin; Jordi Rodon; Russell Broaddus; Tae-Beom Kim; John Mendelsohn; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Debu Tripathy; Gordon B Mills; Ken Chen
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-25

9.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Tumor mutational burden is a determinant of immune-mediated survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra Thomas; Eric D Routh; Ashok Pullikuth; Guangxu Jin; Jing Su; Jeff W Chou; Katherine A Hoadley; Cristin Print; Nick Knowlton; Michael A Black; Sandra Demaria; Ena Wang; Davide Bedognetti; Wendell D Jones; Gaurav A Mehta; Michael L Gatza; Charles M Perou; David B Page; Pierre Triozzi; Lance D Miller
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.110

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): Non-genetic tumor heterogeneity and immune microenvironment: Emerging treatment options.

Authors:  Jae Young So; Joyce Ohm; Stan Lipkowitz; Li Yang
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 13.400

2.  Mutational Analysis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Targeted Kinome Sequencing.

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Yoo; Woo Seung Lee; Jisun Kim; Min Kyoon Kim; In-Ae Park; Ju Han Kim; Wonshik Han
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.922

Review 3.  Mismatch repair-deficient hormone receptor-positive breast cancers: Biology and pathological characterization.

Authors:  Elham Sajjadi; Konstantinos Venetis; Roberto Piciotti; Marco Invernizzi; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Svasti Haricharan; Nicola Fusco
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.722

4.  Triptonide effectively inhibits triple-negative breast cancer metastasis through concurrent degradation of Twist1 and Notch1 oncoproteins.

Authors:  Mengli Zhang; Mei Meng; Yuxi Liu; Jindan Qi; Zhe Zhao; Yingnan Qiao; Yanxing Hu; Wei Lu; Zhou Zhou; Peng Xu; Quansheng Zhou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 5.  H3K36 trimethylation-mediated biological functions in cancer.

Authors:  Chu Xiao; Tao Fan; He Tian; Yujia Zheng; Zheng Zhou; Shuofeng Li; Chunxiang Li; Jie He
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  De novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer - A systematic review of population-level changes in survival since 1995.

Authors:  S J Lord; K Bahlmann; D L O'Connell; B E Kiely; B Daniels; S A Pearson; J Beith; M K Bulsara; N Houssami
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-29

7.  Gene Mutations Associated With Clinical Characteristics in the Tumors of Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chunfang Hao; Chen Wang; Ning Lu; Weipeng Zhao; Shufen Li; Li Zhang; Wenjing Meng; Shuling Wang; Zhongsheng Tong; Yanwu Zeng; Leilei Lu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Breast Cancer-Delivered Exosomal miRNA as Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for Metastasis Prediction: A Focus on Translational Research with Clinical Applicability.

Authors:  Oana Baldasici; Valentina Pileczki; Daniel Cruceriu; Laura Ioana Gavrilas; Oana Tudoran; Loredana Balacescu; Laurian Vlase; Ovidiu Balacescu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Smoking History as a Potential Predictor of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xinan Wang; Biagio Ricciuti; Joao V Alessi; Tom Nguyen; Mark M Awad; Xihong Lin; Bruce E Johnson; David C Christiani
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 11.816

10.  High Mutation Burden in ER-Positive/HER2-Negative/Luminal Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Ioannis A Voutsadakis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.