Literature DB >> 33293332

Factors predicting the risk of loss of decisional capacity for medical assistance in dying: a retrospective database review.

Debbie Selby1, Christopher Meaney2, Sally Bean2, Elie Isenberg-Grzeda2, Amy Nolen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bill C-14, the legislation that legalized medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada in 2016, outlines eligibility criteria and includes both a mandated 10-day reflection period and a requirement that the patient have capacity to consent at the time MAiD is provided. We examined clinical factors associated with shortened reflection periods or loss of capacity before provision of MAiD.
METHODS: This retrospective database review involved patients who requested MAiD at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada, between June 2016 and April 2019. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the association between the combined outcome of unanticipated loss of decisional capacity, shortening of the reflection period or death and the clinical risk factors of interest (age, sex, location of MAiD request [inpatient v. outpatient], score on palliative performance scale [PPS] and diagnosis [cancer v. noncancer]). We generated receiver operating characteristic curves to identify the PPS score (encompassing 5 functional domains: ambulation, activity level, self-care, intake and level of consciousness) that best predicted loss of capacity, shortening of the reflection period or death.
RESULTS: In total, 155 patients requested assessment for MAiD, and 136 of these were included in the statistical analyses. For 68 patients, the reflection period was not shortened; the other 68 patients lost capacity, died or required shortening of the reflection period. In contrast to the results for age, sex, location of request and diagnosis, the PPS score was associated with loss of capacity or shortening of the reflection period (odds ratio 4.63, 95% confidence interval 2.87-8.23, per 10-point decrease in PPS score). PPS scores less than or equal to 40% balanced sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value while emphasizing sensitivity to prevent false negative errors.
INTERPRETATION: The PPS score at the time of MAiD request was strongly associated with loss of capacity or shortening of the reflection period, with lower scores incrementally increasing the risk of these outcomes. For patients with a PPS score of 40% or below, close monitoring is warranted, potentially with plans made to allow rapid provision of MAiD should their clinical condition deteriorate. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33293332      PMCID: PMC7743904          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  15 in total

1.  The euthanasia law in Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Luc Deliens; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Luxembourg is to allow euthanasia from 1 April.

Authors:  Rory Watson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-03-24

3.  Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool.

Authors:  F Anderson; G M Downing; J Hill; L Casorso; N Lerch
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.250

4.  Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives.

Authors:  Brigette M Hales; Sally Bean; Elie Isenberg-Grzeda; Bill Ford; Debbie Selby
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2019-10

5.  Clinician accuracy when estimating survival duration: the role of the patient's performance status and time-based prognostic categories.

Authors:  Debbie Selby; Anita Chakraborty; Tammy Lilien; Erica Stacey; Liying Zhang; Jeff Myers
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Validation of the palliative performance scale in the acute tertiary care hospital setting.

Authors:  Oludamilola Olajide; Laura Hanson; Barbara M Usher; Bahjat F Qaqish; Robert Schwartz; Stephen Bernard
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon--the first year's experience.

Authors:  A E Chin; K Hedberg; G K Higginson; D W Fleming
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Attachment styles of Oregonians who request physician-assisted death.

Authors:  Robert L Oldham; Steven K Dobscha; Elizabeth R Goy; Linda Ganzini
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2011-06

9.  Experiences and perspectives of people who pursued medical assistance in dying: Qualitative study in Vancouver, BC.

Authors:  Amelia Nuhn; Sheila Holmes; Michaela Kelly; Alanna Just; Jessica Shaw; Ellen Wiebe
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Meta-analysis of survival prediction with Palliative Performance Scale.

Authors:  Michael Downing; Francis Lau; Mary Lesperance; Nicholas Karlson; Jack Shaw; Craig Kuziemsky; Steve Bernard; Laura Hanson; Lola Olajide; Barbara Head; Christine Ritchie; Joan Harrold; David Casarett
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.250

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experiences of healthcare providers with eligible patients' loss of decision-making capacity while awaiting medical assistance in dying.

Authors:  Caroline Variath; Elizabeth Peter; Lisa Cranley; Dianne Godkin
Journal:  Palliat Care Soc Pract       Date:  2022-10-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.