Literature DB >> 30887936

Improving the Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) process: A qualitative study of family caregiver perspectives.

Brigette M Hales1, Sally Bean2,3, Elie Isenberg-Grzeda4,5, Bill Ford6, Debbie Selby7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The road to legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) across Canada has largely focused on legislative details such as eligibility and establishment of regulatory clinical practice standards. Details on how to implement high-quality, person-centered MAID programs at the institutional level are lacking. This study seeks to understand what improvement opportunities exist in the delivery of the MAID process from the family caregiver perspective.
METHOD: This multi-methods study design used structured surveys, focus groups, and unstructured e-mail/phone conversations to gather experiential feedback from family caregivers of patients who underwent MAID between July 2016 and June 2017 at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Data were combined and a qualitative, descriptive approach used to derive themes within family perspectives. RESULT: Improvement themes identified through the narrative data (48% response rate) were grouped in two categories: operational and experiential aspects of MAID. Operational themes included: process clarity, scheduling challenges and the 10-day period of reflection. Experiential themes included clinician objection/judgment, patient and family privacy, and bereavement resources. SIGNIFICANCE OF
RESULTS: To our knowledge, this is the first time that family caregivers' perspectives on the quality of the MAID process have been explored. Although practice standards have been made available to ensure all legislated components of the MAID process are completed, detailed guidance for how to best implement patient and family centered MAID programs at the institutional level remain limited. This study provides guidance for ways in which we can enhance the quality of MAID from the perspective of family caregivers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Family perspective; Medical assistance in dying; Physician-assisted death; Qualitative research; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30887936     DOI: 10.1017/S147895151900004X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Support Care        ISSN: 1478-9515


  6 in total

1.  Factors predicting the risk of loss of decisional capacity for medical assistance in dying: a retrospective database review.

Authors:  Debbie Selby; Christopher Meaney; Sally Bean; Elie Isenberg-Grzeda; Amy Nolen
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-12-08

2.  Exploring key stakeholders' attitudes and opinions on medical assistance in dying and palliative care in Canada: a qualitative study protocol.

Authors:  Gilla K Shapiro; Eryn Tong; Rinat Nissim; Camilla Zimmermann; Sara Allin; Jennifer Gibson; Madeline Li; Gary Rodin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Medical assistance in dying legislation: Hospice palliative care providers' perspectives.

Authors:  Soodabeh Joolaee; Anita Ho; Kristie Serota; Matthieu Hubert; Daniel Z Buchman
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  How can we improve the experiences of patients and families who request medical assistance in dying? A multi-centre qualitative study.

Authors:  Simon J W Oczkowski; Diane E Crawshaw; Peggy Austin; Donald Versluis; Gaelen Kalles-Chan; Michael Kekewich; Dorothyann Curran; Paul Miller; Michaela Kelly; Ellen Wiebe; Andrea Frolic
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Medical Assistance in Dying in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a mixed methods longitudinal study protocol.

Authors:  Madeline Li; Gilla K Shapiro; Roberta Klein; Anne Barbeau; Anne Rydall; Jennifer A H Bell; Rinat Nissim; Sarah Hales; Camilla Zimmermann; Rebecca K S Wong; Gary Rodin
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Medications and dosages used in medical assistance in dying: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Igor Stukalin; Oluwatobi R Olaiya; Viren Naik; Ellen Wiebe; Mike Kekewich; Michaela Kelly; Laura Wilding; Roxanne Halko; Simon Oczkowski
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2022-01-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.