| Literature DB >> 33291776 |
Esrat Jahan Rupa1, Jin Feng Li1, Muhammad Huzaifa Arif1, Han Yaxi1, Aditi Mitra Puja2, Ahn Jong Chan2, Van-An Hoang1, Lalitha Kaliraj2, Deok Chun Yang1,2, Se Chan Kang2.
Abstract
This study aimed to produce and optimize a Cordyceps militaris-based oil-in-water (O/W) nanoemulsion (NE) encapsulated in sea buckthorn oil (SBT) using an ultrasonication process. Herein, a nonionic surfactant (Tween 80) and chitosan cosurfactant were used as emulsifying agents. The Cordyceps nanoemulsion (COR-NE) was characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and field-emission transmission electron microscope (FE-TEM). The DLS analyses revealed that the NE droplets were 87.0 ± 2.1 nm in diameter, with a PDI value of 0.089 ± 0.023, and zeta potential of -26.20 ± 2. The small size, low PDI, and stable zeta potential highlighted the excellent stability of the NE. The NE was tested for stability under different temperature (4 °C, 25 °C, and 60 °C) and storage conditions for 3 months where 4 °C did not affect the stability. Finally, in vitro cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory activity were assessed. The results suggested that the NE was not toxic to RAW 264.7 or HaCaT (human keratinocyte) cell lines at up to 100 µL/mL. Anti-inflammatory activity in liposaccharides (LPS)-induced RAW 264.7 cells was evident at 50 µg/mL and showed inhibition of NO production and downregulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression. Further, the NE exhibited good antioxidant (2.96 ± 0.10 mg/mL) activity and inhibited E. coli and S. aureus bacterial growth. Overall, the COR-NE had greater efficacy than the free extract and added significant value for future biomedical and cosmetics applications.Entities:
Keywords: Cordyceps extracts; Cordyceps nanoemulsion; antibacterial; antioxidant; inflammation; ultra sonication
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33291776 PMCID: PMC7730259 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25235733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Optimization of the Cordyceps nanoemulsion preparation process.
| Water Extract ( | Sea-Buckthorn Oil | Surfactant | Co-surfactant (Chitosan) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 88% | 6 | 6 | 0.1% |
| S2 | 82% | 6 | 12 | 0.1% |
| S3 | 78% | 6 | 18 | 0.1% |
Cordyceps nanoemulsion stability test after 90 days observations.
| No. of Parameter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h Observation | 90 Days Observation | |||
| Temperature | Room Temperature | 4 °C | 25 °C | 60 °C |
| Particles size (nm) | 87.0 ± 2.1 | 87.1 ± 3 | 114.5 ± 2 | 161.8 |
| PDI value | 0.089 ± 0.023 | 0.100 ± 0.030 | 0.122 ± 0.04 | 0.106 ± 0.04 |
| Zeta potential (mV) | −26.20 ± 2 | −25.94 ± 0.7 | −19.81 ± 0.5 | −12 ± 1.2 |
| pH value | 5.43 ± 0.05 | 5.4 ± 0.02 | 5.39 ± 0.04 | 5.33 ± 0.012 |
Figure 1FT-IR analysis for Cordyceps nanoemulsion with Cordyceps extract (COR-Ex) and sea buckthorn oil.
Figure 2FE-TEM images indicated the spherical shape of Cordyceps nanoemulsion at (A) 1 μm and (B) 500 nm.
Figure 3Cell cytotoxicity analysis of Cordyceps nanoemulsion using MTT assay on (A) macrophage RAW 264.7 cell line and (B) human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cell line.
Figure 4Antioxidant properties of Cordyceps nanoemulsion compared with commercial antioxidant agent Gallic acid using DPPH inhibition assay.
Figure 5Antibacterial efficacy analysis using disk diffusion method against pathogenic bacteria E. coli and S. aureus: (A) Cordyceps nanoemulsion (B) COR-Ex, (C) bar chart for calculating inhibition zone of Cordyceps nanoemulsion against E. coli and S. aureus compared with commercial antibiotics Neomycin 30.
Figure 6Effect of Cordyceps nanoemulsion on: (A) NO production and pro-inflammatory cytokines (B) TNF-α, (C) IL-1β, (D) IKKa, (E) iNOS, (F) IL-6, and (G) NF-kß mRNA expression in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. Each value is expressed as the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared with control.
List of primer.
| GAPDH | Forward | 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3 |
| Reverse | 5′-CCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG-3 | |
| IL-1β | Forward | 5′-TGCAGAGTTCCCCAACTGGTACATC-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-GTGCTGCCTAATGTCCCCTTGAATC-3′ | |
| TNF-α | Forward | 5′-AGCCCACGTCGTAGCAAACCACCAA-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-AACACCCATTCCCTTCACAGAGCAAT-3′ | |
| IL-6 | Forward | 5′-GTTCTCTGGGAAATCGTGGA-3′ |
| Reverse | 5′-TGTACTCCAGGTAGCTATGG-3′ | |
| iNOS | Forward | 5′-AATGGCAACATCAGGTCGGCCATCACT-3 |
| Reverse | 5′-GCTGTGTGTCACGAAGTCTCGAACTC-3 | |
| NFκB | Forward | 5′-TATTTCAACCACAGATGGCACTGC-3 |
| Reverse | 5′-CAGATTTTGACCTGAGGGTAAGAC-3 | |
| IKKα | Forward | 5′-GGCCTGTGATGTCCTGAAGAATT-3 |
| Reverse | 5′-TCGAATCCCAGACCCTATATCACT-3 |