Literature DB >> 33291675

Occlusion Effect in Response to Stimulation by Soft Tissue Conduction-Implications.

Miriam Geal-Dor1,2, Cahtia Adelman1,2, Shai Chordekar2,3, Haim Sohmer4.   

Abstract

To gain insight into the broader implications of the occlusion effect (OE-difference between unoccluded and occluded external canal thresholds), the OE in response to pure tones at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 kHz to two bone conduction sites (mastoid and forehead) and two soft tissue conduction (STC) sites (under the chin and at the neck) were assessed. The OE was present at the soft tissue sites and at the bone conduction sites, with no statistical difference between them. The OE was significantly greater at lower frequencies, and negligible at higher frequencies. It seems that the vibrations induced in the soft tissues (STC) during stimulation at the soft tissue sites are conducted not only to the inner ear and elicit hearing, but also reach the walls of the external canal and initiate air pressures in the occluded canal which drive the tympanic membrane and excite the inner ear, leading to hearing. Use of a stethoscope by the internist to hear intrinsic body sounds (heartbeat, blood flow) serves as a clear demonstration of STC and its relation to hearing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bekesy; bone conduction; occlusion effect; soft tissue conduction; stethoscope

Year:  2020        PMID: 33291675      PMCID: PMC7768409          DOI: 10.3390/audiolres10020012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Res        ISSN: 2039-4330


  11 in total

1.  Factors contributing to bone conduction: the outer ear.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Timothy Wild; Naohito Hato; Richard L Goode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  THE OCCLUSION EFFECT IN BONE CONDUCTION HEARING.

Authors:  D P GOLDSTEIN; C S HAYES
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1965-06

3.  Hearing one's own voice during phoneme vocalization--transmission by air and bone conduction.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Per Ostli; Bo Håkansson; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The Occlusion Effect and Ear Canal Sound Pressure Level.

Authors:  Marc A Fagelson; Frederick N Martin
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  A model of the occlusion effect with bone-conducted stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Sabine Reinfeldt
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 6.  Acoustic and physiologic aspects of bone conduction hearing.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

7.  Thresholds to soft tissue conduction stimulation compared to bone conduction stimulation.

Authors:  Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 8.  Investigation of the mechanism of soft tissue conduction explains several perplexing auditory phenomena.

Authors:  Cahtia Adelman; Shai Chordekar; Ronen Perez; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09

Review 9.  Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  Soft Tissue Conduction: Review, Mechanisms, and Implications.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effect of Stimulation Position and Ear Canal Occlusion on Perception of Bone Conducted Sound.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Stefan Stenfelt; Shengjian Wu; Zhihao Yan; Jinqiu Sang; Chengshi Zheng; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

Review 2.  How Is the Cochlea Activated in Response to Soft Tissue Auditory Stimulation in the Occluded Ear?

Authors:  Miriam Geal-Dor; Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-07-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.