Literature DB >> 17922349

A model of the occlusion effect with bone-conducted stimulation.

Stefan Stenfelt1, Sabine Reinfeldt.   

Abstract

An acoustical model using simplified ear anatomy was designed to predict the ear-canal sound pressure occlusion effect in humans. These predictions were compared perceptually as well as with ear-canal sound pressure occlusion effect measurements using a foam earplug with shallow insertion, a foam earplug with deep insertion into the bony part of the ear canal, and a circumaural earmuff. There was good resemblance between model predictions and ear-canal sound pressure measurements. It was also found that all occlusion positions, even deep ear-canal occlusion, produced noticeable occlusion effects. With the bone-conduction transducer at the forehead, the perceived occlusion effect was close to that obtained from ear-canal sound pressure data in the 0.3 to 2 kHz frequency range; when the stimulation was at the mastoid the difference between the perceived and measured ear-canal sound pressure occlusion effect was around 10 dB at frequencies below 1 kHz. Further, the occlusion effect was obtained in two clinical settings: with supra-aural earphones (TDH39), and insert earphones (CIR22). Although both transducers produced occlusion effects, insert earphones produced a greater effect than surpa-aural earphones at the low frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922349     DOI: 10.1080/14992020701545880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  15 in total

1.  Middle-ear and inner-ear contribution to bone conduction in chinchilla: The development of Carhart's notch.

Authors:  David Chhan; Peter Bowers; Melissa L McKinnon; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators.

Authors:  Robert H Margolis; Samantha M Stiepan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-16

5.  Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

6.  Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  Vowel production of Mandarin-speaking hearing aid users with different types of hearing loss.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Hung; Ya-Jung Lee; Li-Chiun Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Measurements of inter-cochlear level and phase differences of bone-conducted sound.

Authors:  Robert W J Mcleod; John F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A technique for estimating the occlusion effect for frequencies below 125 Hz.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Anna M Paul; Patrick Axon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Perception of One's Own Voice After Hearing-Aid Fitting for Naive Hearing-Aid Users and Hearing-Aid Refitting for Experienced Hearing-Aid Users.

Authors:  Johanna Hengen; Inger L Hammarström; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.