Literature DB >> 33291369

Survival Rate of 1008 Short Dental Implants with 21 Months of Average Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study.

João Caramês1,2,3, Ana Catarina Pinto2, Gonçalo Caramês2, Helena Francisco1,2, Joana Fialho4, Duarte Marques1,2,3.   

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated the survival rate of short, sandblasted acid-etched surfaced implants with 6 and 8 mm lengths with at least 120 days of follow-up. Data concerning patient, implant and surgery characteristics were retrieved from clinical records. Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA)-surfaced tissue-level 6 mm (TL6) or 8 mm (TL8) implants or bone-level tapered 8 mm (BLT8) implants were used. Absolute and relative frequency distributions were calculated for qualitative variables and mean values and standard deviations for quantitative variables. A Cox regression model was performed to verify whether type, length and/or width influence the implant survival. The cumulative implant survival rate was assessed by time-to-event analyses (Kaplan-Meier estimator). In all, 513 patients with a mean age of 58.00 ± 12.44 years received 1008 dental implants with a mean follow-up of 21.57 ± 10.77 months. Most implants (78.17%) presented a 4.1 mm diameter, and the most frequent indication was a partially edentulous arch (44.15%). The most frequent locations were the posterior mandible (53.97%) and the posterior maxilla (31.55%). No significant differences were found in survival rates between groups of type, length and width of implant with the cumulative rate being 97.7% ± 0.5%. Within the limitations of this study, the evaluated short implants are a predictable option with high survival rates during the follow-up without statistical differences between the appraised types, lengths and widths.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant length; prognosis; short implant; survival rate

Year:  2020        PMID: 33291369      PMCID: PMC7761997          DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  52 in total

1.  Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants.

Authors:  J S Hermann; D Buser; R K Schenk; J D Schoolfield; D L Cochran
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.

Authors:  Franck Renouard; David Nisand
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Retrospective multicenter study of 230 6-mm SLA-surfaced implants with 1- to 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel Rodrigo; Gustavo Cabello; Mariano Herrero; David Gonzalez; Federico Herrero; Luis Aracil; Sergio Morante; Helena Rebelo; Gabriel Villaverde; Andrés García; Ángel Alonso; Manuel Barrachina; Juan Blanco; Ricardo Faría Almeida
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review.

Authors:  D S Thoma; M Zeltner; J Hüsler; C H F Hämmerle; R E Jung
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  What is a pragmatic clinical trial?

Authors:  Hywel C Williams; Esther Burden-Teh; Andrew J Nunn
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 6.  The sandwich osteotomy technique to treat vertical alveolar bone defects prior to implant placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Roccuzzo; Sissi Marchese; Nils Worsaae; Simon Storgård Jensen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Quality assessment of systematic reviews on vertical bone regeneration.

Authors:  J M Saletta; J J Garcia; J M M Caramês; H Schliephake; D N da Silva Marques
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys.

Authors:  Adriano Piattelli; Giuseppe Vrespa; Giovanna Petrone; Giovanna Iezzi; Susanna Annibali; Antonio Scarano
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 9.  Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Matteo Chiapasco; Paolo Casentini; Marco Zaniboni
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Short implants (5-8 mm) vs long implants (≥10 mm) with augmentation in atrophic posterior jaws: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Suya Chen; Qianmin Ou; Yan Wang; Xuefeng Lin
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.837

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.