Literature DB >> 33290772

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy: Follow-up from the Consortium for Food Allergy Research.

Amy M Scurlock1, A Wesley Burks2, Scott H Sicherer3, Donald Y M Leung4, Edwin H Kim2, Alice K Henning5, Peter Dawson5, Robert W Lindblad5, M Cecilia Berin3, Christine B Cho4, Wendy F Davidson6, Marshall Plaut6, Hugh A Sampson3, Robert A Wood7, Stacie M Jones8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consortium for Food Allergy Research investigators previously reported 52-week outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy, observing modest and statistically significant induction of desensitization, highest in children ages 4 to 11 years.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate changes in efficacy, safety, and mechanistic parameters following extended open-label peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy.
METHODS: Peanut-allergic participants (4-25 years) received 52 weeks of placebo (PLB), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100) or 250 μg (VP250), and then crossed over to VP250 for PLB (PLB-VP250) and VP100 (VP100-VP250) participants and continued treatment for VP250 participants (total = 130 weeks of active epicutaneous immunotherapy). Efficacy was assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (5044 mg peanut protein), and adherence, safety, and mechanistic parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: At week 130, desensitization success was achieved in 1 of 20 (5%) PLB-VP250, 5 of 24 (20.8%) VP100-VP250, and 9 of 25 (36%) VP250 participants, with median successfully consumed dose change from baseline of 11.5 mg, 141.5 mg, and 400 mg, respectively. Median age (years) for week 130 desensitization success was 6.2 years (interquartile range, 5.2-9.1) versus 9.4 years (interquartile range, 7.6-12.8) for failures (P < .001). Adherence was 96%. Adverse reactions were predominantly local patch-site reactions. Significant increases in peanut- and Ara h2-specific IgG4 observed at week 52 persisted to week 130. By a post hoc analysis, there were no statistically significant increases from week 52 to week 130 in either desensitization success or successfully consumed dose.
CONCLUSIONS: Extended treatment with VP250 was well tolerated, and desensitization observed at week 52 persisted between weeks 52 and 130. Treatment success was observed predominantly in younger participants, with younger age at initiation of active therapy an important predictor of success.
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IgE; IgG(4); Peanut allergy; desensitization; epicutaneous immunotherapy; follow-up; food allergy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33290772      PMCID: PMC8612061          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  24 in total

1.  Mechanical injury polarizes skin dendritic cells to elicit a T(H)2 response by inducing cutaneous thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression.

Authors:  Michiko K Oyoshi; Ryan P Larson; Steven F Ziegler; Raif S Geha
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 10.793

2.  Effect of Varying Doses of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Exposure Among Patients With Peanut Sensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Hugh A Sampson; Wayne G Shreffler; William H Yang; Gordon L Sussman; Terri F Brown-Whitehorn; Kari C Nadeau; Amarjit S Cheema; Stephanie A Leonard; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Christine Sauvage-Delebarre; Amal H Assa'ad; Frederic de Blay; J Andrew Bird; Stephen A Tilles; Franck Boralevi; Thierry Bourrier; Jacques Hébert; Todd D Green; Roy Gerth van Wijk; André C Knulst; Gisèle Kanny; Lynda C Schneider; Marek L Kowalski; Christophe Dupont
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Fibronectin and fibrinogen contribute to the enhanced binding of Staphylococcus aureus to atopic skin.

Authors:  S H Cho; I Strickland; M Boguniewicz; D Y Leung
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up.

Authors:  Scott H Sicherer; Anne Muñoz-Furlong; James H Godbold; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  The impact of food allergy on the daily activities of children and their families.

Authors:  Mary E Bollinger; Lynnda M Dahlquist; Kim Mudd; Claire Sonntag; Lindsay Dillinger; Kristine McKenna
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.347

6.  The prevalence, severity, and distribution of childhood food allergy in the United States.

Authors:  Ruchi S Gupta; Elizabeth E Springston; Manoj R Warrier; Bridget Smith; Rajesh Kumar; Jacqueline Pongracic; Jane L Holl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Long-term follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  A Wesley Burks; Robert A Wood; Stacie M Jones; Scott H Sicherer; David M Fleischer; Amy M Scurlock; Brian P Vickery; Andrew H Liu; Alice K Henning; Robert Lindblad; Peter Dawson; Marshall Plaut; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Epicutaneous immunotherapy on intact skin using a new delivery system in a murine model of allergy.

Authors:  L Mondoulet; V Dioszeghy; M Ligouis; V Dhelft; C Dupont; P-H Benhamou
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.018

9.  Long-term sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy in children: Clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization.

Authors:  Edwin H Kim; Luanna Yang; Ping Ye; Rishu Guo; Quefeng Li; Michael D Kulis; A Wesley Burks
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  Intact skin and not stripped skin is crucial for the safety and efficacy of peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in mice.

Authors:  Lucie Mondoulet; Vincent Dioszeghy; Emilie Puteaux; Mélanie Ligouis; Véronique Dhelft; Franck Letourneur; Christophe Dupont; Pierre-Henri Benhamou
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 5.871

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current insights: a systemic review of therapeutic options for peanut allergy.

Authors:  Eimear O'Rourke; Hilary Tang; Andrew Chin; Andrew Long; Sayantani Sindher; R Sharon Chinthrajah
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2022-03-11

2.  Allergen-specific T cells and clinical features of food allergy: Lessons from CoFAR immunotherapy cohorts.

Authors:  M Cecilia Berin; Charuta Agashe; A Wesley Burks; David Chiang; Wendy F Davidson; Peter Dawson; Alexander Grishin; Alice K Henning; Stacie M Jones; Edwin H Kim; Donald Y M Leung; Madhan Masilamani; Amy M Scurlock; Scott H Sicherer; Robert A Wood; Hugh A Sampson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 14.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.