Crystallization of carboplatin-loaded onto microporous calcium phosphate using high-vacuum method: Characterization and release study.

Drug delivery systems are a new approach to increase therapeutic efficacy and to reduce the side effects of traditional treatments. Calcium phosphates (CaPs) have been studied as drug delivery systems, especially in bone diseases. However, each system has some particularities that depend on the physical and chemical characteristics of the biomaterials and drug interaction. In this work, granulated CaPs were used as a matrix for loading the anticancer drug carboplatin using the high-vacuum method. Five compositions were applied: hydroxyapatite (HA), β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), biphasic HAp 60%/β-TCP 40% (BCP), β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite, and β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite. Carboplatin drug in 50, 60, and 70 mg/g was precipitated on the surface of CaPs. Morphological, chemical and surface modifications in the carboplatin-CaPs were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), backscattered electron microscopy (BSE), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), and Raman spectroscopy. The characterization of the CaP-carboplatin biomaterials showed heterogeneous crystalline precipitation of the drug, and no morphological modifications of the CaPs biomaterials. The in vitro release profile of carboplatin from CaPs was evaluated by the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) method. The curves showed a burst release of upon 60% of carboplatin loaded followed by a slow-release of the drug for the time of the study. The results were typical of a low-interaction system and physisorption mechanism. The high-vacuum method permitted to load the high amount of carboplatin drug on the surface of the biomaterials despite the low interaction between carboplatin and CaPs.

Introduction

Calcium phosphate (CaP) biomaterials are used as bone substitutes and as materials in the regeneration tissue process due to their similarities with natural apatites. These bioceramics present strong physicochemical similarity with the mineral part of bone tissue, resulting in favorable properties for their use as a filler in bone and dental defects [1,2]. CaP bioceramics are recognized as biocompatible biomaterials; they can be osteoconductive and osteoinductive. The biological behavior of the biomaterial is deeply connected to chemical, microstructural, and surface properties, as well as to porosity [2,3]. Furthermore, these characteristics influence directly the physisorption/chemisorption processes that permit loading the CaP microstructure with therapeutic substances. As a result, suitable characteristics of CaPs permit its use as a matrix for drug-delivery system [4]. The amount of drug in CaP and the release behavior are influenced by the size, shape, surface area, and crystallinity of the biomaterials. These characteristics can be achieved or modified by the material source, chemical composition, synthesis method, and processing conditions used in biomaterial acquisition [5-7]. CaPs can be used in different forms, depending on the desired application [8,9]. CaP powders, cements, blocks, scaffolds or granules, as well as CaP composites with natural and synthetic polymers, can be used as a matrix for drug loading [10-12]. Biodegradable CaPs nanopowders or composites have been studied as alternatives nanocarriers or prodrugs to traditional systemic therapies [13-17]. However, the main application of CaPs as drug delivery systems is to release drugs in bone diseases. CaPs have been widely used as bone fillers in orthopedic and maxillofacial applications, osteosarcoma, and osteoporosis. The addition of drugs in CaPs biomaterials to be delivered locally can prevent or treat bone diseases and accelerate tissue recovery [18-21].

Hydroxyapatite, n>an class="Chemical">tricalcium phosphate, biphasic materials, and substituted apatites have been used as CaP biomaterials in bone treatment and delivery systems [7,22]. CaPs also can form systems used to coat metallic implants that increase bioactivity and drug delivery [23].

Several substances have been loading in n>an class="Chemical">CaP delivery systems: antibiotics and anti-inflammatories, to prevent and treat osteomyelitis [24-27]; drugs and hormones, to improve the bone remodeling process [7,28]; genetic material [29,30]; and therapeutic drugs, in cancer disease [22,31,32]. Cancer treatment usually involves undesirable side effects. Local delivery of therapeutics in oncology is targeting benefits, such as reducing the doses of the drug, minimizing and preventing side effects and cytotoxicity in other organs and tissues [31-33].

In the last decades, many systems were designed using CaPs, namely hydroxyapatite, to deliver antitumoural drugs [34-38]. Platinum-based agents, such as cisplatin, carboplatin, kiteplatin, and others have received attention in systems with CaPs [14,32,36,39], to provide therapeutic agents specifically into cells and tissues, including in bone tumors, by combining the bone remodeling characteristics of CaPs with their suitable features to be used as delivery systems. Designing a drug delivery system should consider the interactions between the drug and carrier matrix. Different types of interaction can rule drug loading and release. Depending on the affinity of the drug with CaP surface and its characteristics, the predominant interaction mechanism verified may be electrostatic or hydrophobic/hydrophilic physisorption or chemical interactions, which modify the drug loading amount and the release time of the drug [4,22]. The amount of the substance loaded in biomaterials for drug delivery depends on the material used, the method to drug loading, and the final application. The parameters of the CaP used as a carrier and the drug, as well as the drug loading process, result in different systems that present specific characteristics of delivery behavior.

In the literature, many drugloading techniques were repn>orted. The solvent evapn>oration was used to remove toxic substances used in the case of poorly water-soluble drugs or polymer-drugs systems [40,41]. Drugs or molecules have been loaded in porous biomaterials by impregnation methods, based on adsorption processes that depend on the interaction between drug and matrix after a time of contact. It has been reported the use of pressure to improve the loaded amount of drugs in porous matrices [42-44]. The study of Itokazu et al. [35] used the vacuum pressures to improve the penetration of an anticancer drug in calcium phosphate blocks. In this paper, the vacuum method was applied to fill the interconnected microporosity with the drug solution and promote the deposition of carboplatin through solvent volatilization. The carboplatin drug was loaded in well-crystalline granular CaP biomaterials by high-vacuum pressure. Hydroxyapatite and (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) powders were synthesized by the wet chemical method using calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and phosphoric acid (H3PO4). Granulated biomaterials were obtained by attrition milling. Five different compositions were tested: hydroxyapatite (HA), β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), biphasic HA 60%/β-TCP 40% (BCP), β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite, and β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite. HA, β-TCP and BCP bioceramics are widely studied as biomaterials for bone regeneration and delivery systems. The β-TCP nanocomposites were developed to achieve a higher porosity than the β-TCP matrix. The drug loading and release were carried out to evaluate the influence of microstructure and chemical composition on the CaPs-carboplatin systems. Characterization studies and release test in the CaPs-carboplatin biomaterials were carried out to determine the interaction between the matrices and the drug and the in-vitro release profile of the system.

Materials and methods

Materials

Calcium carbonate (n>an class="Chemical">CaCO3) from Synth, batch number 63767, and phosphoric acid H3PO4−85 wt% in water) from Dinamica, batch number 68436, were used in the synthesis of granular biomaterials. Carboplatin was obtained from pharmaceutical forms Tevacarbo solution for injection, batch number 12B14LA, and Tecnocarb powder for solution, batch number 85922. Amorphous silica powder and magnesium oxide from magnesium carbonate calcination were used to produce granular nanocomposites.

Synthesis and preparation of granular biomaterials

HA and β-TCP were prepared by the wet chemical method, modified from a previously published study [45], using calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and phosphoric acid (H3PO4) in the quantities required for the formation of precipitates with the desired Ca/P molar ratio. Calcium carbonate was dispersed in distilled water and sonicated in an Ultrasonic Processor 500 W; 20 kHz; 13 mm probe; Sonics Vibra-Cell VCX 500 for 10 minutes. Phosphoric acid was slowly added dropwise into CaCO3 suspension under stirring. The pH of the reaction medium was measured throughout the synthesis. The suspension was kept under stirring overnight and dried in a rotatory evaporator. In this work, it was not used any buffer or alkaline solution, such as ammonia hydroxide (NH4OH), as a pH adjustment agent, as reported in other works [46-48]. Powders of hydrated calcium phosphate precipitated in the synthesis were sieved on a 100 μm mesh. They were calcined at 900°C for 2 hours, and the obtained nanostructured powder of HA and β-TCP were used to produce granulate biomaterials. Five different compositions of granular biomaterials were produced by an attrition milling, in a method described in other studies [2,49]: HA, β-TCP, a biphasic biomaterial with ratio 60/40 in volume and two nanocomposites, β-TCP/SiO2 5% and β-TCP/MgO 1%, in volume. Briefly, calcined powders and the second phase for nanocomposites were added in a Netzsch attrition mill with a 50/50wt% solid/liquid concentration in ethyl alcohol and 2.5 mm zirconium spheres, at 540 rpm for 1 hour. After the process, the material was dried in a rotatory evaporator, and the granular biomaterials recovered were sieved and sintered at 1,100°C for 2 hours.

Carboplatin loading on granular biomaterials

Carboplatin solution in a drug concentration of 10 n>an class="Chemical">mg/g was obtained from pharmaceuticals forms that contain the drug and the same quantity of mannitol in their formula. The solution was added to the biomaterials in the quantities required to achieve three different final concentrations of carboplatin: 50, 60, and 70 mg/g. One g of the granular biomaterial was immersed in the carboplatin solution under 10−2 millibar pressure vacuum for about 48 hours, until completing the dryness and reaching a constant weight. The weight of the biomaterials after the drug load was verified and compared with the theoretical ones to give the percentage of remaining CaP-carboplatin loaded after the process, by the Eq 1: In which:

W1 = theoretical weight calculated by the actual weight of the biomaterials and the drug content added, considering n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin and mannitol in its formulation;

W2 = weight of the pan class="Chemical">CaP-carboplatin sampn>les after the drug loading.

Carboplatin release from the granular biomaterials

In-vitro release of carboplatin was carried out in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 as dissolution medium, and 250 mg of CaP-carboplatin granular biomaterial was dispersed in 100 mL of phosphate buffer and kept under 80–100 rpm rotation and 37 ± 1°C. The pH of the medium at 37°C was measure before and after the release study. The volume of the dissolution medium was calculated in order to guarantee sink conditions in the study, avoiding supersaturation and concentration gradient in the system. Five-mL samples were withdrawn by a pipette and filtered at the times points of 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, and 300 minutes. The sample volume was replaced each time with the same quantity of fresh phosphate buffer to maintain the volume constant. The drug concentration and the carboplatin calibration curve (S1 Fig) were determined by ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectroscopy, in a Spectroquant Pharo 300M spectrometer, at 232 nm. Absorption values were corrected by CaP biomaterials blank experiments, by subtracting the absorbance of carboplatin free absorbance at the same wavelength. The final concentration in which point was calculated correcting the carboplatin concentration in the previous step in the release test, by the Eq 2 [25]: In which:

Ctcor = the corrected concentration of pan class="Chemical">carboplatin in the time t;

Ct = the apparent concentration at the time t;

v = the volume of the sample in each time point;

V = the total volume of the test medium.

Biomaterials characterization

Biomaterials characterizations were carried out using different techniques. The microstructure of the biomaterials and the surface morphological features after drug loading were determined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) technique with a JEOL JSM-6701F equipment, using a secondary electrons image and backscattered electron micrography (BSE), with the electron acceleration voltage of 15 kV. FE-SEM coupled with an X-ray analysis system (EDS) was used to analyze the elemental composition in the CaP-carboplatin granulated biomaterials. All samples were sputtered with gold-palladium under argon atmosphere.

The specific surface area was measured through Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method using a Micromeritics ASAn>an class="Chemical">P2020 after degassing the granulated biomaterials by N2 gas at 300°C for 2 hours.

Phase compn>on>an class="Chemical">sition was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), before and after the drug loading. The studies were performed in a Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer XRD-6000 with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å), generated at 40 kV/3 mA current intensity, using the diffraction angle of 2θ; step size 0.02°; between 10–70°.

The chemical composition and the amount of n>an class="Chemical">platinum element in the CaP-carboplatin granulated biomaterials were determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) in a Shimadzu EX-720 X-ray spectrometer using rhodium anode X-ray tube.

Vibrational modes of carboplatin were determined in the sampn>les in a Fourier transformer Shimadzu n>an class="Chemical">Prestige-21 spectrometer. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded from 4,000 to 400 cm-1 and KBr pellets. Raman spectra were obtained using a Brüker Senterra spectrometer equipped with a He-Ne laser operating at 532 nm and 1,200 L.mm-1 grating.

Results

Synthesis of calcium phosphate biomaterials

The pH of the suspension was measured during the aqueous precipitation step of the synthesis. The initial pH of the calcium carbonate suspension was about 10 before the addition of H3PO4 and slightly increased with ultrasonic irradiation application. After the addition of H3PO4, the pH decreased to about 6 due to the acidification of the reaction medium since no one alkaline solution was added. After the end of the acid addition, the pH increased progressively, reaching the values of 7.1 for CaP 1.67 molar and 7.0 for CaP 1.5 molar in 24 hours (S2 Fig). Nanometric powders were recovered after drying in a rotatory evaporator. After calcination at 900°C for 2 hours, hydroxyapatite and β-TCP crystalline powders from CaP 1.67 and CaP 1.5 synthesis, respectively, were obtained (XRD and FT-IR characterization in S3 and S4 Figs). The powders presented interconnected microporosity (SEM characterization in S5A and S5B Fig). They were used to produce granulated microporous biomaterials by attrition milling technique.

Microstructure of the biomaterials

The surface microstructure of granulated biomaterials before drug loading performed by SEM showed that each biomaterial had regular morphology with the presence of interconnected porosity (Fig 1). The HA biomaterial (Fig 1A) had a very-fined microstructure compared with β-TCP (Fig 1B), which presented large-size grains. The biphasic biomaterial (Fig 1C) had the same microstructure with an intermediate size, due to the presence of HA and β-TCP in its composition. The secondary phases added in β-TCP in nanocomposites biomaterials changed the microstructure. β-TCP/MgO (Fig 1D) displayed very-fined globular grains compared with β-TCP only. β-TCP/SiO2 (Fig 1E) presented nanosized structures in the interconnected microstructure, due to the SiO2 added as a secondary phase.

Fig 1

The initial microstructure of the biomaterials.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of (a) hydroxyapatite (HA); (b); β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP); (c) biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP); (d) β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite; (e) β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of (a) n>an class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite (HA); (b); β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP); (c) biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP); (d) β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite; (e) β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite.

The surface analysis was performed by BSE-SEM to evidence carboplatin in the biomaterials, due to the proportional intensity of backscattered electron emission with the increase in the atomic number. Carboplatin drug was precipitated in different sizes on the surface of the microporous biomaterials (large arrows). In the BSE image in Fig 2A and 2C, the surfaces of HA and BCP presented micrometric precipitates of carboplatin. Fig 2B shows drug precipitates about 1 μm. Fig 2D shows a structure with different contrast in β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite (straight arrow) that is compatible with mannitol in carboplatin drug, whose carbon structure presents a different behavior in backscattered electron analysis. Fig 2E shows an amorphous precipitation in β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite (large arrow). The microstructure of biomaterials after the drug loading process did not change, compared with the previous SEM analysis.

Fig 2

Morphology of precipitated drug onto calcium phosphate surface.

Backscattered electron microscopy analysis of the biomaterials-carboplatin loading in the 70 mg/g concentration showing the micrometric carboplatin precipitate in (a) hydroxyapatite (HA), (b) β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and (c) biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP); mannitol precipitate in (d) β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite; amorphous precipitate in (e) β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite.

Backscattered electron microscopy analysis of the biomaterials-n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin loading in the 70 mg/g concentration showing the micrometric carboplatin precipitate in (a) hydroxyapatite (HA), (b) β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and (c) biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP); mannitol precipitate in (d) β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite; amorphous precipitate in (e) β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite.

SEM-EDS analysis was carried out to detect the elemental compn>osition of the biomaterials after drug-loading. Fig 3A shows a micrometric precipitate of carboplatin in HA biomaterial. EDS analysis indicated the presence of the platinum element, as well as calcium and phosphorus from the CaP matrix (Fig 3D). Fig 3B shows embedded carboplatin in biphasic CaP matrix. EDS analysis of point 1 (Fig 3F) detected platinum element, while in point 2 only calcium and phosphorus were detected (Fig 3E). Fig 3C shows a drug precipitate without well-defined boundaries, as seen in other materials, and silica nanoparticles were detected in carboplatin precipitates in TCP-β/SiO2 nanocomposite. Elemental analysis of a precipitate in TCP-β/SiO2 nanocomposite (Fig 3G) detected calcium, platinum, and silicon. Palladium element in Fig 3E and 3F came from gold-palladium layer deposited by ion sputtering on the samples before analysis.

Fig 3

Morphology and composition of carboplatin precipitates on the calcium phosphate surface.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the biomaterials-carboplatin loading: (a) well-defined micrometric carboplatin precipitated in HA-carboplatin 60 mg/g surface; (b) carboplatin precipitate and superposed calcium phosphate biomaterial in BCP-carboplatin 50 mg/g; (c) not well-defined boundary of carboplatin in β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite 70 mg/g; energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis detected peaks of marked regions: (d) the EDS analysis of point 1 in HA-carboplatin; (e) the EDS analysis of point 2 and (f) of point 1 in BCP-carboplatin; (g) the EDS analysis of the β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite.

Surface area

The results of BET analysis are shown in Table 1. n>an class="Chemical">HA and β-TCP/SiO2 biomaterials presented a greater superficial area, both having a surface area about 2.5 times than the one of β-TCP biomaterial. BCP biomaterial had an intermediate surface area compared with HA and β-TCP. The addition of a secondary phase in the β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite increased the surface area compared with the β-TCP matrix alone.

Table 1

The initial surface area of the calcium phosphate (CaP) biomaterials.

CaP	Surface area (m2.g-1)
HA	2.47
β-TCP	1.02
BCP	1.95
β-TCP/MgO	1.45
β-TCP/SiO2	2.44

X-ray diffraction (XRD)

The XRD analysis in n>an class="Chemical">CaP granular biomaterials before drug loading revealed the high crystallinity of sintered materials (Fig 4A). The high-intensity peaks of HA—JCPDS card (Ca10(PO4)6OH2), ref. no. 75–0565—and β-TCP—JCPDS card (Ca3(PO4)2), ref. no. 09–0169—are shown in the diffractograms. The XRD patterns from the biomaterials after loading 70 mg/g carboplatin did not indicate any changes in the diffraction pattern of the biomaterials, except for the presence of peaks of carboplatin in all the samples (Fig 4B). The nanocomposite β-TCP/SiO2 presented carboplatin peaks with low intensity compared with other materials. The drug pattern showed the presence of carboplatin and mannitol in the material. Mannitol presented weak intensity peaks in the drug and was not detected in the biomaterials after drug loading.

Fig 4

X-ray diffraction analysis of the biomaterials before and after drug loading.

(a) detected characteristics hydroxyapatite (H) and β-TCP (T) peaks in the calcium phosphates (CaPs) before drug loading; (b) carboplatin (C) peaks in biomaterials after drug loading process in the 70 mg/g concentration, compared with the drug that presented carboplatin (C) and mannitol peaks (M).

(a) detected characteristics n>an class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite (H) and β-TCP (T) peaks in the calcium phosphates (CaPs) before drug loading; (b) carboplatin (C) peaks in biomaterials after drug loading process in the 70 mg/g concentration, compared with the drug that presented carboplatin (C) and mannitol peaks (M).

X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)

XRF of CaP-carboplatin biomaterials was used to determine the elemental chemical compn>on>an class="Chemical">sition and measure the amount of platinum element after drug loading (Table 2). The elements Ca and P were expected in CaP biomaterials. Silicium element was identified in β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite, while Zr and Fe detected in minor quantities were from the zirconium balls and chemical composition of the CaCO3 used in the synthesis, respectively. The platinum element was identified in all composition and doses. The quantities measured did not exhibit a correlation with the amount of carboplatin concentration, although the composition showed an increase in Pt amount with the increment of the dose loaded for most biomaterials.

Table 2

X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy of calcium phosphate (CaP)-carboplatin (wt%).

Biomaterial	Carboplatin (mg/g)	Ca	P	Si	Pt	Zr	Fe
HA	50	80.220	12.096	-	7.626	-	0.058
	60	84.671	5.416	-	9.823	0.023	0.068
	70	85.163	3.775	-	10.995	-	0.067
β-TCP	50	82.924	10.898	-	6.083	0.039	0.056
	60	80.464	12.918	-	6.545	0.020	0.053
	70	84.088	8.118	-	7.730	-	0.058
BCP	50	82.924	10.898	-	6.083	0.039	0.056
	60	80.874	10.951	-	8.113	-	0.062
	70	81.737	12.290	-	5.914	-	0.060
β-TCP/MgO	50	83.737	7.631	-	8.549	-	0.082
	60	82.796	5.825	-	11.284	0.025	0.070
	70	84.364	4.946	-	10.617	-	0.073
β-TCP/SiO2	50	79.536	10.796	3.568	6.045	-	0.055
	60	77.244	11.095	3.265	8.298	0.038	0.059
	70	78.682	13.339	3.563	4.361	-	0.055

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

The FT-IR spectroscopy is a powerful technique capable of characterizing CaP biomaterials, as well as platinum drugs and mannitol [50-53]. Fig 5 illustrates the FT-IR spectra of the drug-loaded CaP biomaterials compared with the carboplatin drug alone. The spectra of biomaterials presented characteristic absorption bands of HA or/and β-TCP. HA and BCP biomaterials exhibited absorption band (narrow peak) at 3570 and 632 cm-1 assigned to apatitic OH- groups; the characteristic phosphate groups stretching were detected in ~1090–1030 cm-1 (ν3) and 962 cm-1 for HA-contain and 970 and 944 cm-1 for β-TCP-contain biomaterials (ν1). The CaP biomaterials also presented absorption bands assigned to phosphate bending mode in ~600–550 cm-1 (ν4) and stretching mode in 474 cm-1 (ν2). The FT-IR spectra of CaP-carboplatin indicated the presence of carboplatin and mannitol as well. Mannitol was detected in a broad band from–OH group in ~3400 cm-1 and a band from–CH stretching mode at 2940 cm-1. The bands of carboplatin were the broad bands in ~3280 and 1640 cm-1 assigned to stretching and bending mode of NH3 group, respectively, as well as–CH2 bending mode and–C-O stretching mode in 1380 and 1348 cm-1. The high-intensity bands assigned from–C-O of mannitol first and second alcohol in 1087 and 1025 cm-1, as well as the characteristic vibrational modes of platinum-ligands, were not detected in FT-IR spectra of CaP-carboplatin biomaterials.

Fig 5

Fourier transform infrared analysis of the biomaterials after the drug loading.

FTIR analysis of the 70 mg/g carboplatin-biomaterials compared with carboplatin drug alone (carboplatin and mannitol).

FTIR analysis of the 70 n>an class="Chemical">mg/g carboplatin-biomaterials compared with carboplatin drug alone (carboplatin and mannitol).

Raman spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy is extensively used in the characterization of apatite compounds, which present Raman-active modes for OH- and PO43- groups [54,55]. The technique is also useful to detect platinum-ligands in the low-frequency range with high-intensity bands [51,56]. Fig 6 illustrates the Raman spectra of the 70 mg/g CaP-carboplatin biomaterials compared with carboplatin drug in the range of 3700–66 cm-1 (Fig 6A) and the range of Raman scattering of platinum-ligands vibrational modes (700–150 cm-1) (Fig 6B). All the CaP-carboplatin biomaterials presented the very strong band assigned to the asymmetric stretching mode of PO43- group (ν1) at 975–950 cm-1, as well as the weak bands from the symmetric stretching mode (ν3). HA-contains biomaterials presented a band assigned to–OH stretching mode at ~3570 cm-1 from apatite hydroxyl group. All the biomaterials presented superposed bands assigned to–CH2 stretching modes from cyclobutane ring of carboplatin and–CH stretching modes from mannitol. β-TCP/MgO nanocomposite presented a very weak band assigned to NH3 stretching mode from carboplatin (Fig 6A). The low-frequency range of CaP-carboplatin in all compositions is shown in Fig 6B. The PO43- bending modes were detected at 650–580 (ν4) and 470–450 cm-1 (ν2). All the CaP-carboplatin Raman spectra presented bands at ~545 and ~471 cm-1 assigned to Pt-N and Pt-O stretching modes, respectively. The weak intensity band corresponding to N-Pt-N bending mode at ~190 cm-1 was detected in 50 and 60 mg/g HA-carboplatin, 60 mg/g HA/β-TCP-carboplatin, and 70 mg/g β-TCP-carboplatin only (Fig 6B). There was not detected any correlation between the Raman scattering intensity and the doses of carboplatin loaded.

Fig 6

Raman spectroscopy of the granulated calcium phosphate-carboplatin biomaterials and carboplatin drug alone (carboplatin and mannitol).

(a) High-intensity phosphate peaks of calcium phosphate biomaterials and carboplatin-drug detected peaks in the 70 mg/g concentration biomaterials; (b) 700–150 cm-1 graphs with calcium phosphate peaks and characteristics platinum vibrational modes of carboplatin in 50 mg/g (black line), 60 mg/g (blue line) and 70 mg/g (red line) biomaterials.

(a) High-intensity n>an class="Chemical">phosphate peaks of calcium phosphate biomaterials and carboplatin-drug detected peaks in the 70 mg/g concentration biomaterials; (b) 700–150 cm-1 graphs with calcium phosphate peaks and characteristics platinum vibrational modes of carboplatin in 50 mg/g (black line), 60 mg/g (blue line) and 70 mg/g (red line) biomaterials.

Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy

UV-Vis spectroscopy is a simpn>le and common technique used to measure carboplatin in previous studies [57,58]. The UV-Vis spectra of CaP-carboplatin biomaterials were compared with a carboplatin drug solution, a mannitol solution, and the blank release study containing only the CaP biomaterials, in the range of 190–400 nm. Fig 7A illustrates the CaP-carboplatin UV-Vis spectra in 60 minutes-time compared with carboplatin drug, and mannitol alone, both in 50 μg.mL-1 solution. The UV-Vis spectra of all CaP-carboplatin biomaterials presented the same absorption behavior that carboplatin drug, meanwhile mannitol did not present any absorption and the substance has not considered in the release study. Fig 7B illustrates the UV-Vis absorption spectra of CaP-biomaterials of 60 minutes-release solution of blank release study. The highlighted line at the same wavelength of carboplatin measurement shows a slight absorption (absorbance scale is not the same of the one in Fig 7A), which was corrected from the carboplatin release study.

Fig 7

Ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy analysis of release medium and blank tests.

(a) UV-Vis spectra of 60 minutes-release solution; 50 μg/mL carboplatin-drug (carboplatin and mannitol) solution (blue line), and 50 μg/mL mannitol solution alone (red line); (b) UV-Vis spectra of blank analysis with only biomaterials and blue line at 232 nm. Absorbance scales in Fig 7A and 7B are not the same.

(a) UV-Vis spectra of 60 minutes-release solution; 50 μg/mL carboplatin-drug (n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin and mannitol) solution (blue line), and 50 μg/mL mannitol solution alone (red line); (b) UV-Vis spectra of blank analysis with only biomaterials and blue line at 232 nm. Absorbance scales in Fig 7A and 7B are not the same.

Table 3 shows the remaining weight of CaP-carboplatin after the high-vacuum process calculated by the n>an class="Chemical">CaP-carboplatin dried samples weight compared with the theoretical ones. The drug loading process using the vacuum method showed minimum losses, and the final CaP-carboplatin load biomaterials weights were 97.6 to 99.9% of the theoretical weight.

Table 3

Remaining weight of the CaP-carboplatin biomaterials after the load process by the high-vacuum method.

Biomaterial	Carboplatin (mg/g)	Theoretical weight (g)	CaP-carboplatin weight (g)	Remaining weight (%)
HA	50	1.1000	1.0863	98.8
	60	1.1201	1.1118	99.3
	70	1.1401	1.1124	97.6
β-TCP	50	1.1000	1.0965	99.7
	60	1.1200	1.1018	98.4
	70	1.1400	1.1260	98.8
BCP	50	1.1000	1.0956	99.6
	60	1.1201	1.1064	99.8
	70	1.1400	1.1326	99.4
β-TCP/MgO	50	1.1001	1.0995	99.9
	60	1.1200	1.1100	99.1
	70	1.1400	1.1152	97.8
β-TCP/SiO2	50	1.1001	1.0853	98.6
	60	1.1201	1.1011	98.3
	70	1.1401	1.1191	98.2

Carboplatin release

The in-vitro release curves of carboplatin from CaP granulated biomaterials in three different doses (50, 60 and 70 mg/g) are shown in Fig 8. The release profile exhibited a burst release of upon 60% of the drug-loaded in the first 15 minutes and a slow-release that maintained the drug rate during the study period. The CaP-carboplatin 50 mg/g (Fig 8A) release the concentration of the drug upon to 30 μg/mg of the biomaterials, for all compositions, that reached over 80% of the drug released during the study period. CaP-carboplatin 60 mg/g curves (Fig 8B) presented similar behavior with 80–90% of the drug released in 5 hours. The initial release for carboplatin 70 mg/g (Fig 8C) was upon 40 μg/mg for all compositions and over 70% was released after 5 hours. However, CaP composition did not show any influence on the rate of carboplatin release. The release behavior was more influenced by the doses previously loaded than the characteristics of the biomaterials. The amount of carboplatin released in the medium from 250 mg of the biomaterials was related to the previous doses loaded. The initial release was upon 8 mg (21.5 μmol) for 50 mg/g and 60 mg/g biomaterials-carboplatin and 10 mg (27 μmol) for 70 mg/g dose (S6 Fig). The pH measured after the release study was 7.4 ± 0.1 at 37°C.

Fig 8

Cumulative carboplatin release from biomaterials carboplatin-load in three different initial concentration.

(a) 50 mg/g; (b) 60 mg/g; (c) 70 mg/g.

(a) 50 mg/g; (b) 60 n>an class="Chemical">mg/g; (c) 70 mg/g.

Discussion

Wet chemical precipitation of calcium phosphate powders in aqueous solution is widely used due to its simple experimentation and low cost [6]. Although water-soluble salts as a calcium source provide a homogeneous reaction medium, the presence of ions, such as acetate, chloride, or nitrate could be undesirable. The dissolution-precipitation method from calcium carbonate suspension as calcium source aims to reduce steps in the process such as the previous calcination of calcium carbonate to calcium oxide, washes, and purification [59]. The composition and morphological characteristics of calcium phosphate by aqueous precipitation using calcium carbonate, as the same as other calcium sources, are a result of the reaction conditions, especially temperature, acid addition rate, and reaction time [60-62]. This work used ultrasonic irradiation to achieve microporous powder of hydroxyapatite and β-TCP after calcination. The effect of ultrasonic irradiation has been associated with stoichiometric and crystalline calcium phosphate phase as demonstrated in another work [48]. The method induced disaggregation and deagglomeration of the particles by cavitation in the aqueous medium and improved the dissolution of calcium carbonate in the suspension.

The CaP granulated biomaterials of this work presented chemical compn>osition and microstructure suitable to be used in bone regeneration as well as a matrix for drug delivery, due to their grain size, surface features, and the presence of the interconnected microporosity [2,4,45]. Calcium phosphates are widely known as biocompatible materials given their similar composition to biological apatites. However, different biological responses could be verified depending on the osteoinductive property and cell differentiation processes. Protein adsorption, biological apatite precipitation, and cell adhesion and differentiation have been related to the chemical composition, solubility, and surface characteristics such as microstructure and porosity [2,63,64]. CaPs also have been demonstrated biocompatibility as well as the osteoinductive mechanism by promoting inflammatory reaction and cell signaling in vitro and in vivo tests. Porosity, microstructure, and surface characteristics have been consistently related to cell adhesion in ceramic, metals, and polymers materials for tissue engineering [64-67]. HA, β-TCP and BCP ceramics have been extensively tested in vitro and in vivo. In the in vivo study of bone formation, Dalmonico et al. [2] showed that the high crystalline microporous granular CaPs biomaterials obtained by attrition milling presented phase composition and high open porosity, suitable to osseointegration and osteoinduction processes as well as biodegradability and bioactivity properties. Wang et al. [68] demonstrated inflammatory response and growth factors gene expression and osteoblastic differentiation in BCP ceramics as well as in their nanoparticles degradation products. The presence of other elements such as Si, Sr, and Mg have been associated with higher biological properties in CaPs biomaterials by influencing mineral metabolism and stimulating cellular activities [45,69]. MgO and SiO2 have been added in β-TCP ceramics on purpose to modify the microstructure due to their ability to impair the grain growth in sintered materials [69,70]. In this paper, the high porous hydroxyapatite and β-TCP, which present higher solubility than HA, are used to produce five different compositions of microporous granular CaPs by the attrition milling process. The five different CaP compositions presented a specific surface area from 1.02 (β-TCP) to 2.47 m2.g-1 (HA). BCP showed an intermediate surface area due to the presence of both HA and β-TCP phases. In nanocomposites, the nanometric particles of the secondary phase increased the surface area to 1.45 and 2.44 m2.g-1 in β-TCP/MgO and β-TCP/SiO2, respectively, and could be an interesting strategy to obtain biomaterials with a higher solubility than the one of HA without reducing the surface area, as in β-TCP materials only [63,71].

The SEM of the biomaterials after drug loading did not show any changes in the biomaterials microstructure and revealed micrometric precipitates of carboplatin, as well as mannitol on the CaPs surface. Backscattered electron analysis was used to highlight the platinum element in different matrices [72-75]. This technique uses the signal of the elastic interaction between the electron beam and the specimen. The BSE images present contrasts due to the proportional scattering cross-section with the mean atomic number (Z), in opposition to the secondary electron (SE) images that have low kinetic energy after escaping from the material surface [76]. The BSE image is dependent on the composition of the material and the condition analysis, such as the particle size, depth, energy, and incident angle of the primary beam [77]. In this work, precipitates from carboplatin and mannitol drug in the CaP surface were distinguished using BSE analysis, compared with SE images used in EDS analysis. The contrast between carboplatin and CaP matrices was slightly reduced compared with other works that highlighted the platinum element in carbon matrices [74,75]. The platinum content and the presence of other elements affect platinum identification in calcium phosphate-based matrices [73]. In this work the carboplatin composition Pt (Z = 78), O (Z = 8), N (Z = 7) and C (Z = 6) reduces the contrast between carboplatin precipitates in CaP matrices. Thus, BSE analysis was more effective in highlighting the micrometric precipitates of carboplatin. However, the contrast of drug precipitates of carboplatin and mannitol, which is composed of low Z atomic number, was remarkable.

SEM/EDS analysis detected n>an class="Chemical">Pt and N from carboplatin and demonstrates that drug precipitates were loaded in heterogeneous sizes and shapes in the biomaterials. The size and morphology of the drug in the CaPs surface are directly related to the incorporation method, which used predetermined drug concentration followed by solvent volatilization under vacuum.

The diffraction pattern of biomaterials before and after drug loading showed a crystalline pattern for carboplatin precipitates. High crystalline CaPs present lower loading capacity due to the better crystalline arrangement and less binding sites than non-crystalline materials, which present more surface defects and irregularities. Thus, high-crystalline CaPs are less reactive, but present more stability and less solubility [63,78,79]. The reduced peaks intensity of the CaPs after the drug loading process is attributed to the presence of carboplatin drug in the CaP surface [80].

Fluorescence X-ray analysis indicated the presence of platinum in all CaP biomaterials. Although XRF analysis has been described in the literature to quantity the among of drug adsorbed in mesoporous biomaterial, in this work the XRF results were not directly related to the loaded drug amount [1]. The XRF deviation found in some load concentrations was attributed to the heterogeneous precipitation in CaP surfaces. Spectroscopic techniques demonstrated the presence of the drug in CaP biomaterials. The presence of mannitol in the drug was detected by hydroxyl group vibrational mode in FT-IR and–CH stretching in Raman spectra [52,53,81]. Platinum vibrational modes at ~550–450 cm-1 had better detection in Raman spectra than FT-IR technique due to the high intensity of the Raman peaks, while FT-IR spectra show high intensity of δPO43- from CaPs that covered the weak peaks of carboplatin in this region [50,51,56]. The presence of vibrational modes and peaks position of the drug and biomaterials indicated that the drug was attached to the CaP surface without any chemisorption process [15,80]. The minimum losses verified by load efficiency calculated (Eq 1) was expected for the loading methodology used and reflected only the losses in the process, not the adsorption capacity of calcium phosphates.

The proposed mechanism for carboplatin loading the granular biomaterials in this work is physisorption on the surface and microporosity. The weak Van der Waals interaction between carboplatin and CaPs was demonstrated by characterization methods applied and release behavior of carboplatin. The DRX, FTIR, and Raman results showed no crystallographic or chemical modifications of neither the matrix nor the drug after the loading process that suggests the reversible interaction. The drug-matrix chemical interaction was related to the appearance or disappearance of characteristic bands after drug loading as well as relevant changes in their position, as other studies reported [15,21,80].

The release of carboplatin from CaPs showed an initial fast release. In the first 15 minutes, more than 60% of carboplatin loaded was released into the medium by dissolving crystalline precipitates attached to the CaPs surface. The initial fast release followed by continuous delivery of carboplatin in the release study indicates an effect of the non-uniform distribution of the drug in the matrix. This non-uniform distribution of carboplatin onto the surface and microporosity was attributed to the evaporation at high-vacuum applied. The effect of the pressure can be assessed by comparing the ibuprofen loading on porous crystalline granular CaPs with similar surface area and porosity performed by Baradari et al. [21] and Chevalier et al. [44] using the impregnation method and evaporation under vacuum, respectively. The low pressure enhances the amount of the drug loaded inside the porosity and modified the release pattern [21,44]. The influence of the pressure on the amount of methotrexate loaded in porous HA blocks was also reported by Itokazu et al. [35]. However, the comparison between the results from different researches was limited not only by the distinct characteristics of the CaP matrices and drugs. The experimental conditions in the release experiments, such as release medium, pH, and volume medium, could influence the results since a standard test has not been established [4]. Additionally, the in vitro concentration verified in release tests cannot be extrapolated to an in vivo approach, especially for local delivery systems, due to the peculiarities of the biological or pathological environment. Nevertheless, release studies can provide an understanding of the release mechanism and drug/carrier interactions [4,21,24]. For example, the diffusion/dissolution model for non-uniform dispersed drug in non-swelling and non-degradable rigid polymer matrices was approached by Xiang and McHugh [82,83]. In calcium phosphate matrices, Shao et al. [25] also attributed the initial fast release followed by a sustained release in calcium phosphate biomaterials to a combination of different loading behavior from surface adsorption and the drug-loaded in the microporosity. The diffusion or dissolution from the surface of biomaterials attributed to the initial burst release of carboplatin, followed by a sustained release was verified even in polymer encapsulated with carboplatin drug [57,84]. Carboplatin and other platinum agents present a burst release profile in the CaPs biomaterials, as well as in other matrices, such as polymers, metallic materials, and mesoporous silica [58,85,86].

The phase compn>osition and porosity of CaP biomaterials were related to in vitro and in vivo biodegradation results [2,45]. Although HA and β-TCP/SiO2 nanocomposite presented higher surface areas among the CaPs biomaterials studied in this work, it was not verified a relationship between BET results and the release profile. The surface area has been related to the drug load capacity and release profile. However, the effect of the surface area in the amount of drug loaded has been considered more significant for large different surface values [43]. Considering surface normalized drug loading, other factors, such as drug-matrix interaction and environmental conditions of drug loading, had more influence on the drug load capacity [4,87,88]. The profile release in this study was attributed to the low interaction between CaPs and carboplatin, as well as the drug concentration and vacuum method used to drug loading [24]. The fast initial release of platinum agents demonstrated anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo. The effectiveness of local therapies using CaPs biomaterials depends on the concentration of the drug in the local site and the time of release. The loading process should consider the affinity between drugs and carriers. In some systems, especially drugs with poor affinity with matrix, the impregnation method could not provide drug amount to reach the concentration to therapeutic effect. Crystalline CaPs present more stability and good biological response but less surface area and available sites for drug interaction [79]. Therefore, alternative methods have been considered to improve drug amounts in CaPs matrices. Uchida et al. [36] demonstrated that an in vivo local delivery from CaPs blocks, filled with a predetermined amount of cisplatin, reached higher concentration in tumor site with a sustained release and reduced detection in plasma and other organs. Thus, local delivery systems based on porous CaPs could be an alternative to reduce side effects in traditional therapy [4,22,85,88].

The solvent evaporation under vacuum method allowed the incorporation of a predetermined amount of drug as in other works [25,44]. In the present study, the vacuum method proved to be useful for loading a low-interaction pan class="Chemical">carboplatin drug to micropn>orous n>an class="Chemical">CaP biomaterial.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the evapn>oration at high-vacuum method allows the incorporation of a specific amount of drugs on the surface and micropn>orosity of CaP biomaterials. On the contrary of impregnation, the vacuum method could be used to load low-interactions drugs. Well-crystalline CaPs present high stability and low solubility, being a suitable material for this purpose. After drug loading, the CaPs biomaterials showed heterogeneous carboplatin and mannitol precipitates from the drug composition used, attached to the CaPs surface. Carboplatin in CaPs was identified by the BSE, the spectroscopic and X-ray techniques. The crystalline precipitation of carboplatin in the CaPs surface was verified by XRD analysis. In this work, carboplatin presented low interaction with CaPs biomaterials, verified by the absence of different vibrational modes and the release pattern in the in-vitro release study. The release pattern showed two stages. An initial burst release of the micrometric precipitates on the surface of CaPs was followed by a slow release of the carboplatin loaded in the microporosity. The different surface area, morphology, and composition of the CaPs used in this work did not influence neither the drug-loaded nor the release. Further in vitro studies are needed to evaluate the biocompatibility and biological properties of CaP biomaterials as well as the effect of carboplatin release from CaPs biomaterials in cancer cell lines.

XRD dataset for biomaterials before drug loading.

(XLSX)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

XRD dataset for biomaterials after drug loading.

(XLSX)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

FTIR dataset for biomaterials after drug loading and carboplatin drug.

(XLSX)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

Raman dataset for biomaterials after drug loading and carboplatin drug.

(XLSX)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

UV-Vis dataset for blank study, release test, and drugs solutions.

(XLSX)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

UV-Vis calibration curve of carboplatin.

(TIF)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

Evolution of pH as a function of time during the synthesis of calcium phosphate with Ca/P molar ratio of 1.67 (left) and 1.5 (right).

(TIF)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

X-ray diffraction analysis of the hydroxyapatite and β-TCP powders used to produce the granular biomaterials.

(TIF)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

Fourier transform infrared analysis of the hydroxyapatite and β-TCP powders used to produce the granular biomaterials.

(TIF)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the powders used to produce the granular biomaterials.

(a) pan class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite and (b) β-pan class="Chemical">TCP.

(TIF)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

Concentration of carboplatin in release medium (100 mL) for 50, 60, and 70 mg/g biomaterials-carboplatin loading.

Amount of carboplatin released in μg and μmol for 250 n>an class="Chemical">mg of the biomaterials-carboplatin loading.

(TIF)

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

18 Sep 2020

pan class="Chemical">PONE-D-20-23966

Crystallization of n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin-loaded onto microporous calcium phosphate using high-vacuum method: Characterization and release study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Savicki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt by Nov 02 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

pan class="Chemical">Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscripan class="Chemical">pt:

A rebuttal letter tpan class="Chemical">hat respn>onds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upn>load this letter as a sepn>arate file labeled 'Respn>onse to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript tn>an class="Chemical">hat highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked cn>an class="Chemical">hanges. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make cn>an class="Chemical">hanges to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend tpan class="Chemical">hat you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscripan class="Chemical">pt.

Kind regards,

Leming Sun, pan class="Gene">Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revipan class="Chemical">sion, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure tn>an class="Chemical">hat your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/pan class="Chemical">PLOSOne_formatting_sampn>le_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/pan class="Chemical">PLOSOne_formatting_sampn>le_title_authors_affin>an class="Disease">liations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. pan class="Chemical">Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscripan class="Chemical">pt technically sound, and do the data supn>port the conclun>an class="Chemical">sions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data tpan class="Chemical">hat supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. pan class="Chemical">Has the statistical analypan class="Chemical">sis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. pan class="Chemical">Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscripan class="Chemical">pt fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copn>yedit accen>an class="Chemical">pted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the spn>ace provided to expn>lain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual pubn>an class="Disease">lication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors report Crystallization of carboplatin-loaded onto microporous calcium phosphate using high-vacuum method: Characterization and release study. In this work, granulated CaPs were used as a matrix for loading the anticancer drug carboplatin using the high vacuum method. Morphological, chemical and surface modifications in the carboplatin-CaPs were investigated in detail. The characterization of the CaP-carboplatin biomaterials showed heterogeneous crystalline precipitation of the drug, and no morphological modifications of the CaPs biomaterials. The in vitro release profile of carboplatin from CaPs was evaluated by the ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) method. The curves showed a burst release of upon 60% of carboplatin loaded followed by a slow-release of the drug for the time of the study. The work is meaningful and can be considered to be published. However there still some key points should be further clarified, major revisions and re-valuation should be needed:

1. Some language errors should be carefully revised throughout the manuscripan class="Chemical">pt.

2. In the introduction part, it is better to list one or two exampn>les to clarify the meaning and appn>an class="Disease">lication of CaP delivery systems.

3. The authors use the vacuum pressures to improve the penetration of an anticancer drug in n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate blocks, however the further prospect is not clear, the authors should further clarify it.

4. In the material part, if the preparation of granular biomaterials adopan class="Chemical">pts the previous prepn>aration method, please provide the related pan class="Disease">literature.

5. As for the result part, the pH and solvent stability of calcium phosphate (CaP)-carboplatin should be determined.

6. The Biocompatibility of n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate (CaP)-carboplatin should be considered and discussed in detail.

7. As for Microstructure of the biomaterials, some pan class="Disease">literatures should be cited, such as J. Mater. Chem. A 2018 21216-21224; ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces (2017) 32308-32315; J. Mater. Sci. (2019) 6719-6727; Mater. Lett. (2017) 82-84.

8. The comparison between the current work and previous examples should be conpan class="Chemical">sidered in detail. The current work prospn>ect is still not clear, which may be further expn>lored through the compn>arison.

Reviewer #2: I only pan class="Chemical">have n>an class="Chemical">few comments:

Why did the authors use the five different compn>on>an class="Chemical">sitions? Are they tipical, or simply you wanted to test them? Please specify.

For Equation 1, Line 138, it should be "100" not "1", because the data were expn>ressed as 100% not 1. Please check about that.

Although UV-Vis spectra method is simpn>le but not accurate. It could be easily influenced by many factors. Hence, it is recommended to use other methods to verify.

Figure 8, drug release was done only in PBS but not n>an class="Gene">physiological media. It is recommended to at least add proteins into the media to make the media more representative. Meanwhile, the authors only measured drug release once? There is no variation for all the data?

**********

6. PLOS authors n>an class="Chemical">have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made pubpan class="Disease">lic.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our n>an class="Chemical">Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submisn>an class="Chemical">sion site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

20 pan class="Gene">Oct 2020

Dear. Leming Sun, pan class="Gene">Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

The authors thank you very much for giving us a cn>an class="Chemical">hance to revise our manuscript. The reviewers’ comments are valuable and very helpful for improving our research paper. We have carefully read all comments and have tried our best to revise the manuscript as per reviewers’ suggestions, which we hope to meet with acceptance requirements. We also thank the reviewers for the comments and suggestions.

Responses to Reviewer´s #1 Comments

1. Some language errors should be carefully revised throughout the manuscripan class="Chemical">pt.

The manuscript was revised. If the language is still not clear enough, as well as in the case of any spn>ecific typogran>an class="Gene">phical or grammatical error, we would be grateful if in the next round of revision the reviewer could indicate the sentences we should improve.

2. In the introduction part, it is better to list one or two exampn>les to clarify the meaning and appn>an class="Disease">lication of CaP delivery systems.

According to the reviewer´s suggestion, we added some examples in the manuscript to clarify the meaning and apn>plication of CaP delivery systems in Introduction (Manuscript, p. 3, lines 60, 62-67). It was pointed out that CaPs could be used as nanopowders or composites to produce delivery systems to be systemically administrated as alternatives to traditional drugs. However, granulated CaP, as well as cements and blocks, have been used as bone fillers. The addition of drugs in these materials is a way to deliver the drugs locally, avoiding the side effects of systemic administration. References were added/used in the manuscript to exemplify this question (BARADARI et al., 2012; BENEDETTI et al., 2015, 2016; CHINDAMO et al., 2020; DHATCHAYANI et al., 2020; KHALIFEHZADEH; ARAMI, 2020; LUCAS-APARICIO et al., 2020; MURATA et al., 2018; SWET et al., 2014).

3. The authors use the vacuum pressures to improve the penetration of an anticancer drug in n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate blocks, however the further prospect is not clear, the authors should further clarify it.

The reviewer has correctly pointed out that the further prospect of the vacuum method can be clarified in the paper. According to the reviewer´s suggestion, we added some explanation in Introduction (p. 4, lines 92-95) to clarify that the impregnation method using high-vacuum pressure followed by solvent volatilization was applied in this research on purpose to improve the carboplatin loaded within the porous structure of granulated CaPs. It was further demonstrated in the results that the carboplatin-loaded in microporous structure affected the drug release due to the initial burst release of the drug precipitated on the surface followed by a sustained release from the dissolution of the drug from microporous (SHAO et al., 2012).

References were added/used in the manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt to exemplify this question (CHEVALIER et al., 2009; GBURECK et al., 2007).

4. In the material part, if the preparation of granular biomaterials adopan class="Chemical">pts the previous prepn>aration method, please provide the related pan class="Disease">literature.

It was mentioned the related previous work in Materials and Methods – Synthesis and prepn>aration of granular biomaterials (p. 5, lines 121-122), but we have added other literature (p. 6, line 133). We would like to point out that the Biomaterials Research Group at Santa Catarina State University used the method described in this paper to obtain granular biomaterials in different researches, with some modification. Hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate powders were obtained by wet chemical methods using a calcium source and phosphoric acid (DALMÔNICO, 2015; DOROZHKIN, 2007; MUNARIN et al., 2015; RAYNAUD et al., 2002). The Biomaterials Group obtained CaP powders from calcium carbonate from calcareous marine sediment and H3PO4 raw materials by Silva et al. (2016). In the present paper, the research group described the modified method using the sonicated slurry of synthetic CaCO3 for the first time. Dalmonico et al. (2017) and Camargo et al. (2014) described the production of granular CaPs biomaterials.

References were added/used in the manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt to exemplify this question (CAMARGO et al., 2014; DALMÔNICO et al., 2017; SILVA et al., 2016).

5. As for the result part, the pH and solvent stability of calcium phosphate (CaP)-carboplatin should be determined.

As a part of the project, the in vitro solubility of CaP biomaterials was performed by soaking the materials in the phosphate buffer pH 7.4 at 37 ºC for four weeks and the materials presented stable weight stable (data not published). However, this study was carried out in Ф 10 mm pressed discs sintered at 1,100 ºC/2h but not in the granulated sintered CaPs. We have not included the data considering that the difference in surface area and microstructure of the materials not allowed the comparative analysis.

The pH of n>an class="Chemical">CaP-carboplatin was measured in the released medium (phosphate buffer at 37 ºC) before and after the release test. The measured pH of 7.4 ± 0.1 results showed no significant deviation from the expected value. This information was added in Materials and Methods - Carboplatin release from the granular biomaterials (p. 7, lines 158-159) and Results - Carboplatin release section (p 16, line 377). Carboplatin is described as stable in aqueous solutions for 24 hours (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/426756).

We would like to point out that the CaP-carboplatin stability was evaluated after the loading process by the X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy analysis, as well as microscopy. In the release study, the UV-Vis spectroscopy was carried out and the same behavior was verified for CaP-carboplatin and carboplatin drug solution. The solubility and stability of calcium phosphate biomaterials were determined by some authors and crystalline CaPs are considered stable in pH and temperature conditions applied in this study (BERTAZZO et al., 2010; DOROZHKIN, 2007; WANG; NANCOLLAS, 2008). In vivo implants of sintered granular calcium phosphate biomaterials could present dissolution along the time. However, this process depends not only on the phase composition and surface characteristics but also on the biological environment and cell activity (DALMÔNICO et al., 2017; DOROZHKIN, 2007; DRAENERT; DRAENERT; DRAENERT, 2013).

6. The Biocompatibility of n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate (CaP)-carboplatin should be considered and discussed in detail.

We agree that although the biocompn>atibility of granulated CaP-carboplatin was not the focus in this paper, this question should be considered due to the importance of this parameter to the applicability of the CaPs. Hence, the topic was discussed in Discussion (p. 17-18, lines 398-418). We also would like to point out that HA, β-TCP, and BCP granulated biomaterials, produced by the same method, have been tested in vivo (DALMÔNICO et al., 2017). The chemical composition, crystallinity, and microstructure of these biomaterials are quite similar to the CaPs used in this paper and they were compared with the previous study. The present study was designed to focus specifically on the synthesis and characterization of CaP-carboplatin biomaterials, but we have included your point as a consideration for future studies in Conclusions (page 23, line 540-541). References were added/used in the manuscript to exemplify this question (AGARWAL; GARCÍA, 2015; BERTAZZO et al., 2010; DALMÔNICO et al., 2017; DRAENERT; DRAENERT; DRAENERT, 2013; JIANG et al., 2017; SAMAVEDI; WHITTINGTON; GOLDSTEIN, 2013).

7. As for Microstructure of the biomaterials, some pan class="Disease">literatures should be cited, such as J. Mater. Chem. A 2018 21216-21224; ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces (2017) 32308-32315; J. Mater. Sci. (2019) 6719-6727; Mater. Lett. (2017) 82-84

The suggested literature was carefully conn>an class="Chemical">sidered. We compared the polymer materials in the suggested literature and cited ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces (2017) 32308-32315 (p. 17, line 406) due to the high porosity and theoretical applicability as materials for tissue engineering. In other literature, however, the polymer materials are described to be suitable for another application but not as biomaterials.

8. The comparison between the current work and previous examples should be conpan class="Chemical">sidered in detail. The current work prospn>ect is still not clear, which may be further expn>lored through the compn>arison.

According to the reviewer´s suggestion, porous CaPs biomaterials for local delivery were compared to the biomaterials of the present study. A comparative analysis between characterization and the release profile described in the literature was added in Discussion (page 20, lines 469-473 and 478-484; page 21, lines 406-412; page 21, lines 505-505 and pages 21-22, lines 511-520). The results of the release study of the anti-inflammatory ibuprofen from porous crystalline granular β-TCP performed by Baradari et al. (2012) showed similar burst release of up to 70% of the drug in the first 15 minutes with a plateau of the release of about 70 min with almost 100% of the drug released in the first hour. The authors used the impregnation method, which depends on the drug/carrier interaction. Another study (CHEVALIER et al., 2009) loaded ibuprofen onto granulated β-TCP with similar composition, surface area, and porosity, using evaporation under vacuum. The comparative analyses showed that the vacuum method improves the contact between drug and microporosity and enhance the amount of the drug-loaded. The methodology applied also did not modify the fast initial release pattern but changed the percentage of the drug released at the same time. In our study, carboplatin presented similar reversible physisorption on CaPs matrices. Similarly, the release profile of CaP-carboplatin in this work also presented an initial fast release but showed a sustained release of the remaining carboplatin, suggesting a combination of the release of the drug from the surface followed by the drug in the microporosity as described by Shao et al (2012). References were added/used in the manuscript to exemplify this question (BARADARI et al., 2012; BARROUG et al., 2004; CHEVALIER et al., 2009; ITOKAZU et al., 1999; UCHIDA et al., 1992).

Responses to Reviewer´s #2 Comments

Reviewer #2: I only pan class="Chemical">have n>an class="Chemical">few comments:

1. Why did the authors use the five different compn>on>an class="Chemical">sitions? Are they tipical, or simply you wanted to test them? Please specify.

Hydroxyapatite, β-TCP, and BCP are the common composition of calcium phosphate bioceramics. Hydroxyapatite presents well-known biocompatibility due to its chemical and crystallographic similarity with biological apatite. Hydroxyapatite is considered the less soluble non-substituted calcium phosphate. Therefore, the synthetic tricalcium phosphates have been used to increase de biological dissolution of bioceramics. HA presents fine microstructure and higher porosity, suitable to cell adhesion, than β-TCP. Biphasic HA/β-TCP ceramics have been studied on purpose to achieve better control over both solubility and microstructural characteristics (DALMÔNICO, 2015; DOROZHKIN, 2016; WANG; NANCOLLAS, 2008; ZHANG et al., 2013).

The CaPs nanocompn>osites have been studied to modify chemical composition as well as the microstructure of the bioceramics. Silica and magnesium have been associated with increased biological response in bone regeneration processes (BOSE et al., 2011; PIETAK et al., 2007; PORTER et al., 2003; SILVA et al., 2016). In the present work, β-TCP/MgO and β-TCP /SiO2 nanocomposites were developed on purpose to achieve a higher porosity of the β-TCP phase. Carboplatin loading was tested in nanocomposites on purpose to verify the influence of the chemical composition in drug loading and release, due to the lack of information on the interaction between these specific compositions and carboplatin. The question was considered in the Introduction, and some words were added to the manuscript (page 5, lines 103-107) as well in the Discussion (Manuscript, pages 17-18, lines 412-418).

References were added/used in the manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt to exemplify this question (BOSE et al., 2011; SILVA et al., 2016; WANG et al., 2017; ZHU et al., 2011).

2. For Equation 1, Line 138, it should be "100" not "1", because the data were expn>ressed as 100% not 1. Please check about that.

Equation 1 was originally based on weight loss equations described in the literature (TAN et al., 2009; TIAN; JIANG, 2018), where “1” was included to give results in terms of remaining weight instead of weight loss:

Equation 1:

Drug loading (%)=1- (W1-W2)/W1 x 100 (1)

In which:

W1 = theoretical weight calculated by the actual weight of the biomaterials and the drug content added, considering n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin and mannitol in its formulation;

W2 = weight of the pan class="Chemical">CaP-carboplatin sampn>les after the drug loading.

For the sake of clarity, we modify Equation 1 as described as follow (GUAN et al., 2005):

Equation 1:

Remaining weight (%)=100 x W2/W1 (1)

In which:

W1 = theoretical weight calculated by the actual weight of the biomaterials and the drug content added, considering n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin and mannitol in its formulation;

W2 = weight of the pan class="Chemical">CaP-carboplatin sampn>les after the drug loading.

We also modified some words in the original manuscript in the Materials and Methods (page 6, line 149) and the Results – Carboplatin loading on granular biomaterials (page 15, page 357).

The title of Table 3 was modified as follows (page 15, pan class="Disease">lines 361-362). Table 3 data were not modified.

Table 3. Remaining weight of the pan class="Chemical">CaP-carboplatin biomaterials after the load process by the high-vacuum method.

3 Although UV-Vis spectra method is simpn>le but not accurate. It could be easily influenced by many factors. Hence, it is recommended to use other methods to verify.

We agree with the reviewer that there are more accurate methods used in n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin detection, such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (QU et al., 2017) or platinum detection using inductively coupled plasma techniques, such as ICP-AES, ICP-OES, and ICP-MS, (BAITUKHA et al., 2019; DOMÍNGUEZ-RÍOS et al., 2019; LELLI et al., 2016). However, UV-Vis techniques have been widely used to determine carboplatin in release studies from calcium phosphate biomaterials and other drug carriers (AKYUZ, 2020; BRAGTA et al., 2018; SHARMA; NASKAR; KUOTSU, 2020; SOUZA; ARDISSON; SOUSA, 2009; THAKUR et al., 2020). UV-Vis method has been also used as a technique in release studies of other drugs in porous drug carriers (BARADARI et al., 2012; BENEDINI et al., 2019; CHEVALIER et al., 2009; TSENG et al., 2015; ZHU et al., 2011).

In our view, the UV-Vis method presents some advantages such as reduced sample manipulation and easy operation method. Some standard procedures such as baseline correction, linear calibration curve, as well as measurements of homogeneous samples in the calibration curve range, can minimize data errors. Our study attempted to address these issues by using a calibration curve with R = 0.99985 (S1_Sup. Information) and properly filtering the collected samples before measuring. We would like to point out that the UV-Vis method was used in this paper considering the influence of the CaPs biomaterials absorbance, which was measured and corrected before calculation, as described in Materials and Methods (page 7, lines 166-167) and Results – Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (page 14, lines 343-346) and showed in Figure 7 (page 15, line 350). It was also verified the influence of mannitol of the drug, that it was considered not relevant, as described in Results (page 15, lines 357-358).

4. Figure 8, drug release was done only in PBS but not n>an class="Gene">physiological media. It is recommended to at least add proteins into the media to make the media more representative. Meanwhile, the authors only measured drug release once? There is no variation for all the data?

In the consulted literature, some release studies were carried out in simulated body fluid or Dulbecco´s Modified Eagle Medium. Sodium chloride 0,9% solution or distilled water were also used (BAITUKHA et al., 2019; PARENT et al., 2017; PROKOPOWICZ, 2018; SOUZA; ARDISSON; SOUSA, 2009). However, phosphate buffers pH 7.4 at 37 ºC with no other addition has been used by most authors as a release medium for carboplatin, as well as other drugs (BARADARI et al., 2012; BENEDINI et al., 2019; BRAGTA et al., 2018; DALEY et al., 2018; DOMÍNGUEZ-RÍOS et al., 2019; QU et al., 2017; SHARMA; NASKAR; KUOTSU, 2020; THAKUR et al., 2020; TSENG et al., 2015). Parent et al. (2017) pointed out that the release experiments described in the literature present many differences in the release medium composition, pH, agitation, and volume, as well as the apparatus used in the experiments. In the present study, the release experiments were carried out in the same conditions of pH, medium composition, and temperature, as described for other authors.

As mentioned in Methods – Carboplatin release from the granular biomaterials (page 7, line 156-161), the release tests were performed in sink conditions, avoiding supersaturation, and concentration gradient in the system. The parameters of the weight of CaP-carboplatin in the release test, agitation, release medium volume, and withdrawn volume samples were calculated considering the usual guidelines for sink conditions and the solubility of carboplatin under buffers solutions as well as other unpredictable factors such as system composition influence (SIEPMANN; SIEPMANN, 2020).

In our view, the release studies provide information about the release mechanism and drug/carrier interaction but cannot be extrapn>olated to an in vivo apn>proach, especially in the case of local delivery matrices. For this reason, the focus of this work was on the mechanism verified and the interaction between carboplatin and CaPs matrices. Thus, each CaP-carboplatin juncture was measured in one experiment. Each withdrawn sample was measured in triplicate to obtain the correct absorbance, which explains the small variation in the data. For the reasons previously mentioned, the in vitro release tests in this work were reported in terms of percentage, and the concentration achieved in the initial release was mentioned just to give a parameter, but the focus was on the release profile. A similar approach has been used in release tests described in the literature, due to the several points measured in experiments, especially in the case of long-term release profiles as well as researches that tested several conditions of materials composition, drugs, or environmental release medium. In the literature, the following research papers could be cited: (ALINAVAZ et al., 2021; BAITUKHA et al., 2019; DADASHI; BODDOHI; SOLEIMANI, 2019; DOADRIO et al., 2015; IONITA et al., 2017; LEGNOVERDE; BASALDELLA, 2016; LIU et al., 2005; MEDERLE et al., 2016; ZHAI; LI, 2019).

Some explanations about the meaning and limitations of the in vitro release tests as well as challenge of data extrapolation to in vivo behavior were added to the original manuscript in the Discussion (pages 20-21, lines 484-491).

References were added/used in the manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt to exemplify this question (BARADARI et al., 2012; MARQUES et al., 2016; PARENT et al., 2017).

Repan class="Chemical">ferences

AGARWAL, R.; GARCÍA, A. J. Biomaterial strategies for engineering impn>lants for enn>an class="Chemical">hanced osseointegration and bone repair. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, v. 94, p. 53–62, 2015.

AKYUZ, L. An imine based COF as a smart carrier for targeted drug den>an class="Disease">livery: From synthesis to computational studies. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, v. 294, p. 109850, 2020.

ALINAVAZ, S. et al. n>an class="Chemical">Hydroxyapatite (HA)-based hybrid bionanocomposite hydrogels: ciprofloxacin delivery, release kinetics and antibacterial activity. Journal of Molecular Structure, v. 1225, p. 129095, 2021.

BAITUKHA, A. et al. On>an class="Chemical">ptimization of a low pressure plasma process for fabrication of a drug delivery system (DDS) for cancer treatment. Materials Science & Engineering C, v. 105, p. 110089, 2019.

BARADARI, H. et al. Calcium phosphate porous pellets as drug den>an class="Disease">livery systems: Effect of drug carrier composition on drug loading and in vitro release. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, v. 32, n. 11, p. 2679–2690, 2012.

BARROUG, A. et al. Interactions of cisplatin with n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate nanoparticles: In vitro controlled adsorption and release. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, v. 22, p. 703–708, 2004.

BENEDETTI, M. et al. Metalated nucleotide chemisorpan class="Chemical">ption on n>an class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, v. 153, p. 279–283, 2015.

BENEDETTI, M. et al. Adsorption of the n>an class="Chemical">cis-[Pt(NH3)2(P2O7)]2-(phosphaplatin) on hydroxyapatite nanocrystals as a smart way to selectively release activated cis-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2] (cisplatin) in tumor tissues. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, v. 157, p. 73–79, 2016.

BENEDINI, L. et al. Adsorption/desorn>an class="Chemical">ption study of antibiotic and anti-inflammatory dugs onto bioactive hydroxyapatite nano-rods. Materials Science & Engineering C, v. 99, p. 180–190, 2019.

BERTAZZO, S. et al. Hydroxyapatite surface solubility and effect on cell adhesion. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, v. 78, p. 177–184, 2010.

BOSE, S. et al. Understandin in vivo response and mechanical propn>erty variation in n>an class="Chemical">MgO, SrO and SiO2 doped β-TCP. Bone, v. 48, p. 1282–1290, 2011.

BRAGTA, n>an class="Chemical">P. et al. Intratumoral administration of carboplatin bearing poly (ε-caprolactone) nanoparticles amalgamated with in situ gel tendered augmented drug delivery, citotoxicity, and apoptosis in melanoma tumor. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, v. 166, p. 339–348, 2018.

CAMARGO, N. H. A. et al. Cpan class="Chemical">haracterization of three n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate microporous granulated bioceramics. Advanced Materials Research, v. 936, p. 687–694, 2014.

CHEVALIER, E. et al. Compn>arison of low-shear and high-shear granulation processes: Efn>an class="Chemical">fect on implantable calcium phosphate granule properties. Drug Delelopment and Industrial Pharmacy, v. 35, n. 10, p. 1255–1263, 2009.

CHINDAMO, G. et al. pan class="Disease">Bone diseases: current approach and future perspn>ectives in drug den>an class="Disease">livery systems for bone target therapeutics. Nanomaterials, v. 10, n. 875, p. 1–35, 2020.

DADASHI, S.; BODDOHI, S.; SOLEIMANI, N. Prepn>aration, cn>an class="Chemical">haracterization, and antibacterial effect of doxycycline loaded kefiran nanofibers. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, v. 52, p. 979–985, 2019.

DALEY, E. et al. Characterization of n>an class="Chemical">doxycycline-loaded calcium phosphate cement for treatment of aneurysmal bone cysts. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, v. 29, n. 109, p. 1–6, 2018.

DALMÔNICO, G. M. L. Elaboração e caracterização de biomateriais granulados microporosos de fosfatos de cálcio: Teste in vivo em ovinos. [s.l.] 2015. 211 p. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência e pan class="Gene">Eng. Materiais) - Univern>an class="Chemical">sidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, 2015.

DALMÔNICO, G. M. L. et al. An in vivo study on bone formation bepan class="Chemical">havior of micropn>orous granular n>an class="Chemical">calcium phosphate. Biomaterials Science, v. 5, n. 7, p. 1315–1325, 2017.

DHATCHAYANI, S. et al. Efn>an class="Chemical">fect of curcumin sorbed selenite substituted hydroxyapatite on osteosarcoma cells: An in vitro study. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, v. 60, n. May, p. 101963, 2020.

DOADRIO, A. L. et al. Use of anodized titanium alloy as drug carrier: Ibuprofen as model of drug relean>an class="Chemical">sing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, v. 492, p. 207–212, 2015.

DOMÍNGUEZ-RÍOS, R. et al. Cisplatin-loaded n>an class="Chemical">PLGA nanoparticles for HER2 targeted ovarian cancer therapy. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, v. 178, p. 199–207, 2019.

DOROZHKIN, S. V. pan class="Chemical">Calcium orthophosphates. J Mater Sci, v. 42, p. 1031–1095, 2007.

DOROZHKIN, S. V. Biphan>an class="Chemical">sic, triphasic, and multiphasic calcium orthophosphates. Advanced Ceramics, v. 8, p. 33–95, 2016.

DRAENERT, M.; DRAENERT, A.; DRAENERT, K. Osseointegration of hydroxyapatite and remodeling-resorption of tricalciumphosphate ceramics. Microscopy Research and Technique, v. 76, n. 4, p. 370–380, 2013.

GBURECK, U. et al. Low temperature direct 3D printed bioceramics and biocompopan class="Chemical">sites as drug release matrices. Journal of Controlled Release, v. 122, p. 173–180, 2007.

GUAN, J. et al. Prepn>aration and cn>an class="Chemical">haracterization of highly porous, biodegradable polyurethane scaffolds for soft tissue applications. Biomaterials, v. 26, n. 18, p. 3961–3971, 2005.

IONITA, D. et al. Activity of vancomycin release from bioinspn>ired coatings of n>an class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite or TiO2 nanotubes. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, v. 517, p. 296–302, 2017.

ITOKAZU, M. et al. Local drug delivery system un>an class="Chemical">sing ceramics: Vacuum method for impregnating a chemotherapeutic agent into a porous hydroxyapatite block. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, v. 10, n. 4, p. 249–252, 1999.

JIANG, S. et al. Ultralight, thermally insulatin, compn>resn>an class="Chemical">sible polyimide fiber assembled sponges. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, v. 9, p. 32308–32315, 2017.

KHAn>an class="Disease">LIFEHZADEH, R.; ARAMI, H. Biodegradable calcium phosphate nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, v. 279, p. 102157, 2020.

LEGNOVERDE, M. S.; BASALDELLA, E. I. Inn>an class="Chemical">fluence of particle size on the adsorption and release of cephalexin encapsulated in mesoporous silica SBA-15. Materials Letters, v. 181, p. 331–334, 2016.

LELLI, M. et al. n>an class="Chemical">Hydroxyapatite nanocrystals as a smart, pH sensitive, delivery system for kiteplatin. Dalton Transactions, v. 45, n. 33, p. 13187–13195, 2016.

LIU, T. Y. et al. On the study of BSA-loaded n>an class="Chemical">calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite nano-carriers for controlled drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release, v. 107, n. 1, p. 112–121, 2005.

LUCAS-APARICIO, J. et al. n>an class="Chemical">Silicon-calcium phosphate ceramics and silicon-calcium phosphate cements: Substrates to customize the release of antibiotics according to the idiosyncrasies of the patient. Materials Science and Engineering C, v. 106, p. 110173, 2020.

MARQUES, C. F. et al. Insights on the propn>erties of n>an class="Chemical">levofloxacin-adsorbed Sr- and Mg-doped calcium phosphate powders. J Mater Sci: Mater Med, v. 27, n. 123, p. 2–12, 2016.

MEDERLE, N. et al. Innovative biomaterials based on collagen-hydroxyapatite and n>an class="Chemical">doxycycline for bone regeneration. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, v. 2016, n. ID 3452171, p. 1–5, 2016.

MUNARIN, F. et al. Micro- and nano-pan class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite as active reinforcement for soft biocompn>on>an class="Chemical">sites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, v. 72, p. 199–209, 2015.

MURATA, T. et al. Evaluation of a new hydroxyapatite nanopn>article as a drug den>an class="Disease">livery system to oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Anticancer Research, v. 38, n. 12, p. 6715–6720, 2018.

PARENT, M. et al. Den>an class="Chemical">sign of calcium phosphate ceramics for drug delivery applications in bone diseases: A review of the parameters affecting the loading and release of the therapeutic substance. Journal of Controlled Release, v. 252, p. 1–17, 2017.

PIETAK, A. M. et al. n>an class="Chemical">Silicon substitution in the calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials, v. 28, p. 4023–4032, 2007.

PORTER, A. E. et al. Compn>arison of in vivo dissolution processes in n>an class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite bioceramics. Biomaterials, v. 24, p. 4609–4620, 2003.

PROKOn>an class="Chemical">POWICZ, M. Characterization of low-dose doxorubicin-loaded silica-based nanocomposites. Applied Surface Science, v. 427, p. 55–63, 1 jan. 2018.

QU, W. et al. EpCAM antibody-conjugated n>an class="Chemical">mesoporous silica nanoparticles to enhance the anticancer efficacy of carboplatin in retinoblastoma. Materials Science and Engineering C, v. 76, p. 646–651, 2017.

RAYNAUD, S. et al. Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/n>an class="Chemical">P atomic ratio I. Synthesis, characterisation and thermal stability of powders. Biomaterials, v. 23, n. 4, p. 1065–1072, 2002.

SAMAVEDI, S.; WHITTINGTON, A. R.; GOLDSTEIN, A. S. Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue n>an class="Gene">engineering: A review of properties and their influence on cell behavior. Acta Biomaterialia, v. 9, p. 8037–8045, 2013.

SHAO, F. et al. n>an class="Chemical">Ibuprofen loaded porous calcium phosphate nanospheres for skeletal drug delivery system. Journal of Materials Science, v. 47, n. 2, p. 1054–1058, 2012.

SHARMA, S.; NASKAR, S.; KUOTSU, K. Metronomic chemotherapy of n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin-loaded PEGylated MWCNTs: synthesis, characterization and in vitro toxicity in human breast cancer. Carbon Letters, v. 30, n. 4, p. 435–447, 2020.

SIEn>an class="Chemical">PMANN, J.; SIEPMANN, F. Sink conditions do not guarantee the absence of saturation effectsInternational Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2020. Disponível em: pharm.2019.119009>

SILVA, D. F. et al. Cn>an class="Chemical">haracterization of mesoporous calcium phosphates from calcareous marine sediments containing Si, Sr and Zn for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, v. 4, p. 6842, 2016.

SOUZA, K. C.; ARDISSON, J. D.; SOUSA, E. M. B. Study of pan class="Chemical">mesoporous silica/pan class="Chemical">magnetite systems in drug controlled release. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, v. 20, n. 2, p. 507–512, 2009.

SWET, J. H. et al. A silica-n>an class="Chemical">calcium-phosphate nanocomposite drug delivery system for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: In vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B, v. 102, n. 1, p. 190–202, 2014.

TAN, R. et al. Prepn>aration and cn>an class="Chemical">haracterization of an injectable composite. J Mater Sci: Mater Med, v. 20, n. 6, p. 1245–1253, 2009.

THAKUR, S. et al. Thermosenn>an class="Chemical">sitive hydrogel containing carboplatin loaded nanoparticles: A dual approach for sustained and localized delivery with improved safety and therapeutic efficacy. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, v. 58, p. 101817, 2020.

TIAN, X.; JIANG, X. Prepn>aring n>an class="Chemical">water-soluble 2, 3-dialdehyde cellulose as a bio-origin cross-linker of chitosan. Cellulose, v. 25, p. 987–998, 2018.

TSENG, C. L. et al. Developn>ment of lattice-inserted n>an class="Chemical">5-Fluorouracil-hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as a chemotherapeutic delivery system. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, v. 30, n. 4, p. 388–397, 2015.

UCHIDA, A. et al. Slow release of anticancer drugs from porous n>an class="Chemical">calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, v. 10, p. 440–445, 1992.

WANG, J. et al. Role of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic-mediated secretion of n>an class="Chemical">signalling molecules by macrophages in migration and osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs. Acta Biomaterialia, v. 54, p. 447–460, 2017.

WANG, L.; NANCOLLAS, G. H. n>an class="Chemical">Calcium orthophosphates: Crystallization and dissolution. Chem. Rev., v. 108, p. 4628–4669, 2008.

ZHAI, Q.-Z. Z.; n>an class="Disease">LI, X.-D. D. Immobilization and sustained release of cefalexin on MCF nano-mesoporous material. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, v. 40, n. 11, p. 1675–1685, 2019.

ZHANG, Y. et al. Dissolution propn>erties of difn>an class="Chemical">ferent compositions of biphasic calcium phosphate bimodal porous ceramics following immersion in simulated body fluid solution. Ceramics International, v. 39, p. 6751–6762, 2013.

ZHU, M. et al. A mesoporous silica nanopn>articulate/β-n>an class="Chemical">TCP/BG composite drug delivery system for osteoarticular tuberculosis therapy. Biomaterials, v. 32, p. 1986–1995, 2011.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Cpan class="Disease">lick here for additional data file.

5 Nov 2020

Crystallization of n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin-loaded onto microporous calcium phosphate using high-vacuum method: Characterization and release study

pan class="Chemical">PONE-D-20-23966R1

Dear Dr. Savicki,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these n>an class="Chemical">have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at httpn>://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upn>coming papn>er to helpn> maximize its impn>act. If they’ll be prepn>aring press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Leming Sun, pan class="Gene">Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (opan class="Chemical">ptional):

Thanks for your revin>an class="Chemical">sion, According to the reviews' comments, I think this manuscript is ready for acceptance.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you n>an class="Chemical">feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments pan class="Chemical">have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments pan class="Chemical">have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscripan class="Chemical">pt technically sound, and do the data supn>port the conclun>an class="Chemical">sions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data tpan class="Chemical">hat supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. pan class="Chemical">Has the statistical analypan class="Chemical">sis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. pan class="Chemical">Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscripan class="Chemical">pt fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copn>yedit accen>an class="Chemical">pted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the spn>ace provided to expn>lain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual pubn>an class="Disease">lication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors responded to all the comments well. The manuscript n>an class="Chemical">has been improved. The latest references are cited. Therefore should be accepted.

**********

7. PLOS authors n>an class="Chemical">have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made pubpan class="Disease">lic.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our n>an class="Chemical">Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Yi Cao

10 Nov 2020

pan class="Chemical">PONE-D-20-23966R1

Crystallization of n>an class="Chemical">carboplatin-loaded onto microporous calcium phosphate using high-vacuum method: Characterization and release study

Dear Dr. Savicki:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upn>coming paper now to helpn> maximize its impn>act. If they'll be prepn>aring press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscrin>an class="Chemical">pt will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Tpan class="Chemical">hank you for submitting your work to n>an class="Chemical">PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on bepan class="Chemical">half of

Dr. Leming Sun

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE