Literature DB >> 33289929

Limitations of the fasting proinsulin to insulin ratio as a measure of β-cell health in people with and without impaired glucose tolerance.

Aoife M Egan1, Marcello C Laurenti1, Maria Daniela Hurtado Andrade1, Chiara Dalla Man2, Claudio Cobelli2, Kent R Bailey3, Adrian Vella1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fasting proinsulin to insulin ratio is elevated in people with type 2 diabetes and has been suggested as a marker of β-cell health. However, its utility in discriminating between individuals with varying degrees of β-cell dysfunction is unclear. Proinsulin has a very different half-life to insulin and unlike insulin does not undergo hepatic extraction prior to reaching the systemic circulation. Given these limitations, we sought to examine the relationship between fasting and postprandial concentrations of β-cell polypeptides (proinsulin, insulin and C-peptide) in people with normal and impaired glucose tolerance in differing metabolic environments.
DESIGN: Subjects were studied on two occasions in random order while undergoing an oral challenge. During one study day, free fatty acids were elevated (to induce insulin resistance) by infusion of Intralipid with heparin. Proinsulin to insulin and proinsulin to C-peptide ratios were calculated for the 0-, 30-, 60- and 240-minute time points. Insulin action (Si) and β-cell responsivity (Φ) indices were calculated using the oral minimal model.
RESULTS: The fasting proinsulin to c-peptide or fasting proinsulin to insulin ratios did not differ between groups and did not predict subsequent β-cell responsivity to glucose during the glycerol or Intralipid study days in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Among nondiabetic individuals, the fasting proinsulin to insulin ratio is not a useful marker of β-cell function.
© 2020 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disposition index; endoplasmic reticulum stress; insulin; insulin action; proinsulin; unfolded protein response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33289929      PMCID: PMC8169515          DOI: 10.1111/eci.13469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   5.722


  27 in total

1.  Increased β-Cell Workload Modulates Proinsulin-to-Insulin Ratio in Humans.

Authors:  Teresa Mezza; Pietro M Ferraro; Vinsin A Sun; Simona Moffa; Chiara M A Cefalo; Giuseppe Quero; Francesca Cinti; Gian Pio Sorice; Alfredo Pontecorvi; Franco Folli; Andrea Mari; Sergio Alfieri; Andrea Giaccari
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 9.461

2.  Hyperproinsulinemia and proinsulin-to-insulin ratios in Swedish middle-aged men: association with glycemia and insulin resistance but not with family history of diabetes.

Authors:  V Grill; B Dinesen; S Carlsson; S Efendic; O Pedersen; C-G Ostenson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Effects of changing diagnostic criteria on the risk of developing diabetes.

Authors:  S F Dinneen; D Maldonado; C L Leibson; G G Klee; H Li; L J Melton; R A Rizza
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Secular trends in the presentation and management of functioning insulinoma at the Mayo Clinic, 1987-2007.

Authors:  Kimberly A Placzkowski; Adrian Vella; Geoffrey B Thompson; Clive S Grant; Carl C Reading; J William Charboneau; James C Andrews; Ricardo V Lloyd; F John Service
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Insulin degradation: progress and potential.

Authors:  W C Duckworth; R G Bennett; F G Hamel
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 19.871

6.  Decreased hepatic insulin extraction in subjects with mild glucose intolerance.

Authors:  E Bonora; I Zavaroni; C Coscelli; U Butturini
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 7.  What Can Diabetes-Associated Genetic Variation in TCF7L2 Teach Us About the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes?

Authors:  J D Adams; Adrian Vella
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  Sympercents: symmetric percentage differences on the 100 log(e) scale simplify the presentation of log transformed data.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  The oral minimal model method.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Chiara Dalla Man; Gianna Toffolo; Rita Basu; Adrian Vella; Robert Rizza
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Insulin and Proinsulin Dynamics Progressively Deteriorate From Within the Normal Range Toward Impaired Glucose Tolerance.

Authors:  Norimitsu Murai; Naoko Saito; Eriko Kodama; Tatsuya Iida; Kentaro Mikura; Hideyuki Imai; Mariko Kaji; Mai Hashizume; Yasuyoshi Kigawa; Go Koizumi; Rie Tadokoro; Chiho Sugisawa; Kei Endo; Toru Iizaka; Ryo Saiki; Fumiko Otsuka; Shun Ishibashi; Shoichiro Nagasaka
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2020-06-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Predisposition to Proinsulin Misfolding as a Genetic Risk to Diet-Induced Diabetes.

Authors:  Maroof Alam; Anoop Arunagiri; Leena Haataja; Mauricio Torres; Dennis Larkin; John Kappler; Niyun Jin; Peter Arvan
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 2.  The β Cell in Diabetes: Integrating Biomarkers With Functional Measures.

Authors:  Steven E Kahn; Yi-Chun Chen; Nathalie Esser; Austin J Taylor; Daniël H van Raalte; Sakeneh Zraika; C Bruce Verchere
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 25.261

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.