Literature DB >> 33284749

A Joint Analysis of Multi-Paradigm fMRI Data With Its Application to Cognitive Study.

Yuntong Bai, Yun Gong, Jianchao Bai, Jingyu Liu, Hong-Wen Deng, Vince Calhoun, Yu-Ping Wang.   

Abstract

With the development of neuroimaging techniques, a growing amount of multi-modal brain imaging data are collected, facilitating comprehensive study of the brain. In this paper, we jointly analyzed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) collected under different paradigms in order to understand cognitive behaviors of an individual. To this end, we proposed a novel multi-view learning algorithm called structure-enforced collaborative regression (SCoRe) to extract co-expressed discriminative brain regions under the guidance of anatomical structure of the brain. An advantage of SCoRe over its predecessor collaborative regression (CoRe) lies in its incorporation of group structures in the brain imaging data, which makes the model biologically more meaningful. Results from real data analysis has confirmed that by incorporating prior knowledge of brain structure, SCoRe can deliver better prediction performance and is less sensitive to hyper-parameters than CoRe. After validation with simulation experiments, we applied SCoRe to fMRI data collected from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort and adopted the scores from the wide range achievement test (WRAT) to evaluate an individual's cognitive skills. We located 14 relevant brain regions that can efficiently predict WRAT scores and these brain regions were further confirmed by other independent studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33284749      PMCID: PMC7925383          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3042786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  46 in total

1.  Preserved functional specialization for spatial processing in the middle occipital gyrus of the early blind.

Authors:  Laurent A Renier; Irina Anurova; Anne G De Volder; Synnöve Carlson; John VanMeter; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Identifying quantitative trait loci via group-sparse multitask regression and feature selection: an imaging genetics study of the ADNI cohort.

Authors:  Hua Wang; Feiping Nie; Heng Huang; Sungeun Kim; Kwangsik Nho; Shannon L Risacher; Andrew J Saykin; Li Shen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  When the brain loses its self: prefrontal inactivation during sensorimotor processing.

Authors:  Ilan I Goldberg; Michal Harel; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Stimulation over the human supplementary motor area interferes with the organization of future elements in complex motor sequences.

Authors:  C Gerloff; B Corwell; R Chen; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI.

Authors:  Randy L Buckner; Fenna M Krienen; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; James Loughead; Karthik Prabhakaran; Monica E Calkins; Ryan Hopson; Chad Jackson; Jack Keefe; Marisa Riley; Frank D Mentch; Patrick Sleiman; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Jan Richard; Monica E Calkins; Rosetta Chiavacci; John A Hansen; Warren B Bilker; James Loughead; John J Connolly; Haijun Qiu; Frank D Mentch; Patrick M Abou-Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Jan Richard; Paul Hughett; Monica E Calkins; Larry Macy; Warren B Bilker; Colleen Brensinger; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State.

Authors:  Linda Geerligs; Mikail Rubinov; Richard N Henson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity?

Authors:  Emily S Finn; Dustin Scheinost; Daniel M Finn; Xilin Shen; Xenophon Papademetris; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Value of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Liver Nodular Lesions.

Authors:  Si Chen; JiaLing Bao
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.009

2.  A tale of two connectivities: intra- and inter-subject functional connectivity jointly enable better prediction of social abilities.

Authors:  Hua Xie; Elizabeth Redcay
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.