Literature DB >> 26468196

State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State.

Linda Geerligs1, Mikail Rubinov2, Richard N Henson3.   

Abstract

Resting-state functional connectivity, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), is often treated as a trait, used, for example, to draw inferences about individual differences in cognitive function, or differences between healthy or diseased populations. However, functional connectivity can also depend on the individual's mental state. In the present study, we examined the relative contribution of state and trait components in shaping an individual's functional architecture. We used fMRI data from a large, population-based human sample (N = 587, age 18-88 years), as part of the Cambridge Centre for Aging and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN), which were collected in three mental states: resting, performing a sensorimotor task, and watching a movie. Whereas previous studies have shown commonalities across mental states in the average functional connectivity across individuals, we focused on the effects of states on the pattern of individual differences in functional connectivity. We found that state effects were as important as trait effects in shaping individual functional connectivity patterns, each explaining an approximately equal amount of variance. This was true when we looked at aging, as one specific dimension of individual differences, as well as when we looked at generic aspects of individual variation. These results show that individual differences in functional connectivity consist of state-dependent aspects, as well as more stable, trait-like characteristics. Studying individual differences in functional connectivity across a wider range of mental states will therefore provide a more complete picture of the mechanisms underlying factors such as cognitive ability, aging, and disease. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The brain's functional architecture is remarkably similar across different individuals and across different mental states, which is why many studies use functional connectivity as a trait measure. Despite these trait-like aspects, functional connectivity varies over time and with changes in cognitive state. We measured connectivity in three different states to quantify the size of the trait-like component of functional connectivity, compared with the state-dependent component. Our results show that studying individual differences within one state (such as resting) uncovers only part of the relevant individual differences in brain function, and that the study of functional connectivity under multiple mental states is essential to disentangle connectivity differences that are transient versus those that represent more stable, trait-like characteristics of an individual.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3513950-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; brain connectivity; fMRI; network; resting state

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26468196      PMCID: PMC4604231          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1324-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Time-resolved resting-state brain networks.

Authors:  Andrew Zalesky; Alex Fornito; Luca Cocchi; Leonardo L Gollo; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture.

Authors:  Fenna M Krienen; B T Thomas Yeo; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A Brain-Wide Study of Age-Related Changes in Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Linda Geerligs; Remco J Renken; Emi Saliasi; Natasha M Maurits; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neurobiological basis of head motion in brain imaging.

Authors:  Ling-Li Zeng; Danhong Wang; Michael D Fox; Mert Sabuncu; Dewen Hu; Manling Ge; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Functional connectivity and graph theory in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Matthew R Brier; Jewell B Thomas; Anne M Fagan; Jason Hassenstab; David M Holtzman; Tammie L Benzinger; John C Morris; Beau M Ances
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Cognitive effort drives workspace configuration of human brain functional networks.

Authors:  Manfred G Kitzbichler; Richard N A Henson; Marie L Smith; Pradeep J Nathan; Edward T Bullmore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Consensus clustering in complex networks.

Authors:  Andrea Lancichinetti; Santo Fortunato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The effect of ageing on fMRI: Correction for the confounding effects of vascular reactivity evaluated by joint fMRI and MEG in 335 adults.

Authors:  Kamen A Tsvetanov; Richard N A Henson; Lorraine K Tyler; Simon W Davis; Meredith A Shafto; Jason R Taylor; Nitin Williams; James B Rowe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  82 in total

1.  Increased fMRI activity correlations in autobiographical memory versus resting states.

Authors:  Kristen N Warren; Molly S Hermiller; Aneesha S Nilakantan; Jonathan O'Neil; Robert T Palumbo; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Language network measures at rest indicate individual differences in naming decline after anterior temporal lobe resection.

Authors:  Samantha Audrain; Alexander J Barnett; Mary P McAndrews
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dynamic brain network configurations during rest and an attention task with frequent occurrence of mind wandering.

Authors:  Ekaterina Denkova; Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Functional brain segmentation using inter-subject correlation in fMRI.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Juha Pajula; Jari Niemi; Riitta Hari; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Cross-paradigm connectivity: reliability, stability, and utility.

Authors:  Hengyi Cao; Oliver Y Chen; Sarah C McEwen; Jennifer K Forsyth; Dylan G Gee; Carrie E Bearden; Jean Addington; Bradley Goodyear; Kristin S Cadenhead; Heline Mirzakhanian; Barbara A Cornblatt; Ricardo E Carrión; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Aysenil Belger; Heidi Thermenos; Ming T Tsuang; Theo G M van Erp; Elaine F Walker; Stephan Hamann; Alan Anticevic; Scott W Woods; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Adolescent sex differences in cortico-subcortical functional connectivity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Yu Sun Chung; Vince Calhoun; Michael C Stevens
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Brain Age: A State-Of-Mind? On the Stability of Functional Connectivity across Behavioral States.

Authors:  Julien Dubois
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stimulus Dependent Dynamic Reorganization of the Human Face Processing Network.

Authors:  Gideon Rosenthal; Olaf Sporns; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Aging and the Resting State: Is Cognition Obsolete?

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 10.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.