Literature DB >> 33284120

Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis.

Anuja Majmundar1, NamQuyen Le2, Meghan Bridgid Moran3, Jennifer B Unger1, Katja Reuter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that social media-based public health campaigns are often targeted by countercampaigns.
OBJECTIVE: Using reactance theory as the theoretical framework, this research characterizes the nature of public response to tobacco prevention messages disseminated via a social media-based campaign. We also examine whether agreement with the prevention messages is associated with comment tone and nature of the contribution to the overall discussion.
METHODS: User comments to tobacco prevention messages, posted between April 19, 2017 and July 12, 2017, were extracted from Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. Two coders categorized comments in terms of tone, agreement with message, nature of contribution, mentions of government agency and regulation, promotional or spam comments, and format of comment. Chi-square analyses tested associations between agreement with the message and tone of the public response and the nature of contributions to the discussions.
RESULTS: Of the 1242 comments received (Twitter: n=1004; Facebook: n=176; Instagram: n=62), many comments used a negative tone (42.75%) and disagreed with the health messages (39.77%), while the majority made healthy contributions to the discussions (84.38%). Only 0.56% of messages mentioned government agencies, and only 0.48% of the comments were antiregulation. Comments employing a positive tone (84.13%) or making healthy contributions (69.11%) were more likely to agree with the campaign messages (P=0.01). Comments employing a negative tone (71.25%) or making toxic contributions (36.26%) generally disagreed with the messages (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of user comments in response to a tobacco prevention campaign made healthy contributions. Our findings encourage the use of social media to promote dialogue about controversial health topics such as smoking. However, toxicity was characteristic of comments that disagreed with the health messages. Managing negative and toxic comments on social media is a crucial issue for social media-based tobacco prevention campaigns to consider. ©Anuja Majmundar, NamQuyen Le, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Jennifer B Unger, Katja Reuter. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 07.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facebook; Instagram; Twitter; health campaign; health communication; internet; online; social media; tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284120      PMCID: PMC7752523          DOI: 10.2196/20649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill        ISSN: 2369-2960


  23 in total

1.  Adolescents' responses to anti-tobacco advertising: exploring the role of adolescents' smoking status and advertisement theme.

Authors:  Erin L Sutfin; Lisa R Szykman; Marian Chapman Moore
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  The Use of Social Networking Sites (SNSs) in Health Communication Campaigns: Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jingyuan Shi; Thanomwong Poorisat; Charles T Salmon
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-11-18

3.  Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator.

Authors:  S Worchel; J W Brehm
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1970-01

4.  Campaigns and counter campaigns: reactions on Twitter to e-cigarette education.

Authors:  Jon-Patrick Allem; Patricia Escobedo; Kar-Hai Chu; Daniel W Soto; Tess Boley Cruz; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: a theoretical approach.

Authors:  Joseph Grandpre; Eusebio M Alvaro; Michael Burgoon; Claude H Miller; John R Hall
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2003

6.  Social Media Use for Public Health Campaigning in a Low Resource Setting: The Case of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking.

Authors:  Mohammed Jawad; Jooman Abass; Ahmad Hariri; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Tweeting for and against public health policy: response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's electronic cigarette Twitter campaign.

Authors:  Jenine K Harris; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Bechara Choucair; Raed Mansour; Mackenzie Staub; Kendall Simmons
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Relationship between social media engagement and e-cigarette policy support.

Authors:  Anuja Majmundar; Chih-Ping Chou; Tess B Cruz; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2018-12-14

9.  Scaling-laws of human broadcast communication enable distinction between human, corporate and robot Twitter users.

Authors:  Gabriela Tavares; Aldo Faisal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter.

Authors:  Jidong Huang; Rachel Kornfield; Glen Szczypka; Sherry L Emery
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Addressing cigarette smoking cessation treatment challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic with social media.

Authors:  Meredith C Meacham; Erin A Vogel; Johannes Thrul; Danielle E Ramo; Derek D Satre
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Tobacco and cannabis use advertisements targeting adolescents and young adults on Snapchat in 2019.

Authors:  Anuja Majmundar; Maya Chu; Cindy Perez; Yannie Hoang; Jared Yuan; Jennifer B Unger; Jon-Patrick Allem
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-03-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.