Literature DB >> 33284117

Patient Challenges and Needs in Comprehending Laboratory Test Results: Mixed Methods Study.

Zhan Zhang1, Daniel Citardi1, Aiwen Xing2, Xiao Luo3, Yu Lu1, Zhe He4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly able to access their laboratory test results via patient portals. However, merely providing access does not guarantee comprehension. Patients could experience confusion when reviewing their test results.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine the challenges and needs of patients when comprehending laboratory test results.
METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey with 203 participants and a set of semistructured interviews with 13 participants. We assessed patients' perceived challenges and needs (both informational and technological needs) when they attempted to comprehend test results, factors associated with patients' perceptions, and strategies for improving the design of patient portals to communicate laboratory test results more effectively. Descriptive and correlation analysis and thematic analysis were used to analyze the survey and interview data, respectively.
RESULTS: Patients face a variety of challenges and confusion when reviewing laboratory test results. To better comprehend laboratory results, patients need different types of information, which are grouped into 2 categories-generic information (eg, reference range) and personalized or contextual information (eg, treatment options, prognosis, what to do or ask next). We also found that several intrinsic factors (eg, laboratory result normality, health literacy, and technology proficiency) significantly impact people's perceptions of using portals to view and interpret laboratory results. The desired enhancements of patient portals include providing timely explanations and educational resources (eg, a health encyclopedia), increasing usability and accessibility, and incorporating artificial intelligence-based technology to provide personalized recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients face significant challenges in interpreting the meaning of laboratory test results. Designers and developers of patient portals should employ user-centered approaches to improve the design of patient portals to present information in a more meaningful way. ©Zhan Zhang, Daniel Citardi, Aiwen Xing, Xiao Luo, Yu Lu, Zhe He. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 07.12.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical laboratory test; consumer health information; health information technology; patient portal

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33284117      PMCID: PMC7752528          DOI: 10.2196/18725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  43 in total

1.  US experience with doctors and patients sharing clinical notes.

Authors:  Jan Walker; Michael Meltsner; Tom Delbanco
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-10

2.  Understanding Patient Information Needs About Their Clinical Laboratory Results: A Study of Social Q&A Site.

Authors:  Zhan Zhang; Yu Lu; Yubo Kou; Danny T Y Wu; Jina Huh-Yoo; Zhe He
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2019-08-21

3.  Supporting Families in Reviewing and Communicating about Radiology Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Matthew K Hong; Clayton Feustel; Meeshu Agnihotri; Max Silverman; Stephen F Simoneaux; Lauren Wilcox
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2017-05-02

4.  Online disease management of diabetes: engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul C Tang; J Marc Overhage; Albert Solomon Chan; Nancy L Brown; Bahar Aghighi; Martin P Entwistle; Siu Lui Hui; Shauna M Hyde; Linda H Klieman; Charlotte J Mitchell; Anthony J Perkins; Lubna S Qureshi; Tanya A Waltimyer; Leigha J Winters; Charles Y Young
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.

Authors:  Taya Irizarry; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Christine R Curran
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals.

Authors:  Daniel T Nystrom; Hardeep Singh; Jessica Baldwin; Dean F Sittig; Traber D Giardina
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2018-06-26

7.  An Informatics Framework to Assess Consumer Health Language Complexity Differences: Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Biyang Yu; Zhe He; Aiwen Xing; Mia Liza A Lustria
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Traber D Giardina; Jessica Baldwin; Daniel T Nystrom; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A new era of oncology through artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2017-05-15

10.  A Patient-Facing Diabetes Dashboard Embedded in a Patient Web Portal: Design Sprint and Usability Testing.

Authors:  William Martinez; Anthony L Threatt; S Trent Rosenbloom; Kenneth A Wallston; Gerald B Hickson; Tom A Elasy
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2018-09-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pregnancy-Related Information Seeking in Online Health Communities: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Yu Lu; Zhan Zhang; Katherine Min; Xiao Luo; Zhe He
Journal:  Divers Divergence Dialogue (2021)       Date:  2021-03-19

2.  User-Centered System Design for Communicating Clinical Laboratory Test Results: Design and Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Zhan Zhang; Lukas Kmoth; Xiao Luo; Zhe He
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-11-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.