| Literature DB >> 33281853 |
Min-Chao Jiang1, Chung-Chi Hu2,3, Wei-Li Hsu4, Tsui-Ling Hsu5, Na-Sheng Lin6, Yau-Heiu Hsu2,3.
Abstract
Plant viruses may <span class="Chemical">sern>ve as <span class="Species">expression vectors for the efficient <span class="Chemical">production of pharmaceutical proteins in plants. However, the downstream processing and post-translational modifications of the target proteins remain the major challenges. We have previously developed an expression system derived from Bamboo mosaic virus (BaMV), designated pKB19, and demonstrated its applicability for the production of human mature interferon gamma (mIFNγ) in Nicotiana benthamiana. In this study, we aimed to enhance the yields of soluble and secreted mIFNγ through the incorporation of various plant-derived signal peptides. Furthermore, we analyzed the glycosylation patterns and the biological activity of the mIFNγ expressed by the improved pKB19 expression system in N. benthamiana. The results revealed that the fusion of a native N. benthamiana extensin secretory signal (SSExt) to the N-terminal of mIFNγ (designated SSExt mIFNγ) led to the highest accumulation level of protein in intracellular (IC) or apoplast washing fluid (AWF) fractions of N. benthamiana leaf tissues. The addition of 10 units of 'Ser-Pro' motifs of hydroxyproline-O-glycosylated peptides (HypGPs) at the C-terminal end of SSExt mIFNγ (designated SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10) increased the solubility to nearly 2.7- and 1.5-fold higher than those of mIFNγ and SSExt mIFNγ, respectively. The purified soluble SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 protein was glycosylated with abundant complex-type N-glycan attached to residues N56 and N128, and exhibited biological activity against Sindbis virus and Influenza virus replication in human cell culture systems. In addition, suspension cell cultures were established from transgenic N. benthamiana, which produced secreted SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 protein feasible for downstream processing. These results demonstrate the applicability of the BaMV-based vector systems as a useful alternative for the production of therapeutic proteins, through the incorporation of appropriate fusion tags.Entities:
Keywords: Bamboo mosaic virus; anti-virus activity; glycosylation; interferon gamma; plant viral vector; signal peptides
Year: 2020 PMID: 33281853 PMCID: PMC7688984 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.594758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Effects of plant-derived signal peptides on production of mIFNγ glycoproteins in N. benthamiana plants. (A) Schematic representation of BaMV-based secretory expression cassettes for high-level protein production, secretion and glycosylation. The N-terminus of mIFNγ was fused with one of five different species of plant-derived signal peptides (SSExt, SS, SS, SS and SS) as expressed using a BaMV-based vector, pKB19. The open reading frames of this viral vector encode RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP, 155K) and RNA silencing suppressor P19 from Tobacco bushy stunt virus under the control of a dual 35S promoter and a nopaline synthase (nos) terminator. (B) Analysis of target protein (TP) expression in inoculated leaves at 5 days post-infection (DPI). The N. benthamiana leaf exacts were separated into intracellular (IC) and apoplast washing fluid (AWF) fractions, and subsequently analyzed by electrophoresis through a 12% polyacrylamide gel containing 0.1% SDS (SDS–PAGE), followed by staining with Coomassie Blue stain (CBS) and immunoblot (IB) analysis with mIFNγ-specific antibodies. M, marker; pKn, vector only; P, positive control, purified mIFNγ protein derived from E. coli (100 ng in CBS and 20 ng in IB) and prepared in TAE buffer; Mγ, M mIFNγ; 1N-MG, M monoglycosylated mIFNγ; 2N-MG, M diglycosylated mIFNγ; MSS, M unprocessed SSmIFNγ; DG, D Glyco-mIFNγ. (C) ELISA quantification of mIFNγ levels relative to fresh weight (FW) of leaves (mg/kg) in IC and AWF fractions of infiltrated leaves at 5 DPI. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) with Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison analysis. The P-value of < 0.001 was considered significantly different, as denoted by different letters. (D) Northern blot analysis of wild-type or chimeric BaMV RNA in infiltrated leaves at 5 DPI. BaMV genomic RNA and the subgenomic RNAs for triple gene block proteins (TGPsgRNA) and CP (CPsgRNA) were detected with a BaMV-specific probe, respectively. The bottom panel shows the amount of rRNA in each sample, stained with Ethidium bromide (EtBr) as the loading control.
FIGURE 2Effect of (SP)10 signal on glycoprotein accumulation and solubility. (A) Schematic representation of BaMV-based secretory expression cassettes with the C-terminal end of SSExt mIFNγ fused with 10 units of ‘Ser-Pro’ motifs of hydroxyproline (Hyp)-O-glycosylated peptides (HypGPs) (designated SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10). (B) Analysis of TP expression in IC and AWF fractions at 5 DPI by SDS–PAGE, followed by staining with CBS (for IC fraction) or silver stain (for AWF) and IB analysis with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated mIFNγ-specific antibodies. Lanes 1 and 2, refer to two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. The unprocessed mIFNγ and SSExt mIFNγ products are indicated by the blank and solid arrowhead, respectively. (C) Analysis of the solubility of TP. The protein extracts of N. benthamina leaf (20 g) without SDS detergent in extraction buffer A were separated into membranous fraction (P30) and soluble fraction (S30) after centrifugation at 30,000 × g, and subsequently analyzed by SDS–PAGE, followed by staining with CBS and IB analysis. The positions of various forms of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 proteins are indicated on the right, based on the estimated molecular weights. M, marker; pKn, vector only; P, positive control, purified mIFNγ protein derived from E. coli; Mγ, M mIFNγ; 1N-MG, M monoglycosylated mIFNγ; 2N-MG, M diglycosylated mIFNγ MSP, M unprocessed SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10; DG, D Glyco-mIFNγ.
Expression levels of mIFNγ, SSExt mIFNγ and SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 in IC or AWF as quantified by ELISA.
| mIFNr | 78 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.03 |
| SSExt mIFNγ | 209 | 3.5 | 9.5 | 1.1 |
| SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 | 489 | 7.5 | 15.2 | 1.7 |
The purification of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 by acetic acid precipitation coupled with Ni2+-NTA and gel filtration chromatography†.
| Yield (mg/kg) | 0 | 551 ± 43 | 326 ± 41 | 94 ± 7 |
| TSP (mg/kg) ¶ | 3825 ± 202 | 3735 ± 34 | 455 ± 45 | 103 ± 8 |
| Purity (%) | – | 15 | 72 | 91 |
FIGURE 3Analysis of the glycosylation of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10. (A) Glycoprotein analysis of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 by CBS and Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) silver stain. Protein samples (0.2 μg each) were separated by SDS–PAGE as described above and examined by CBS or PAS. The identity of each sample is indicated on top of each lane. BSA and IgG from 33D2 monoclonal antibody were used as the negative and positive control, respectively. (B) Deglycosylation analysis of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 with peptide-N-glycosidase A and F (PNGase A and F) treatment. The elimination of N-glycan of purified SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 was detected by IB analysis after PNGases (0.5–5 units) digestion. mIFNγ derived from E. coli as a negative control. SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 was purified from N. benthamiana. The “–” and “+” signs represent treatments with or without PNGases. Various forms of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 proteins were indicated on the right. (C) The amino acid sequence of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 mapped by LC-MS/MS-based peptide sequencing. Following in-solution tryptic digestion, the samples were subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. The resulting amino acid sequence covering 68% of mIFNγ (29–170 residues) were identified and shown in bold. No peptides were identified for the SSExt (residues 1–26) and (SP)10 and 6X His (residues 171-202) regions of the amino sequence, shown in gray. Predicted N56 and N128 glycosylation sites were shown in red. (D) Tryptic digested glycopeptides of residues 45–65, YFNAGHSDVADN56GTLFLGILK, and residues 126–138, LTN128YSVTDLNVQR, from the SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 were identified for glycosylation composition by LC-MS/MS analysis. The percentage of each glycan among the total signals is shown. The white, green, orange and blue columns represent the percentage of non-glycosylation, mannose-, hybrid- or complex-type glycan, respectively. The abbreviations used for monosaccharides are: H, hexose; N, N-acetylhexosamine; F, fucose; X, xylose.
FIGURE 4Biological activity of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 against SINV. HEK293-T cells were either pre-incubated with DMEM (Mock), 50 ng of protein extracts from N. benthamiana healthy leaves as negative control (N), or different concentrations of positive control (PC, commercial IFNγ) or SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10, as indicated in the panel, for 12 h. Subsequently, cells were infected with SINV-eGFP at an M.O.I of 1.0, and analyzed at 24 hpi. (A) eGFP signals as observed by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) The accumulation level of eGFP and actin as analyzed by IB analysis. (C) The relative anti-viral activity of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10. The standard curve of anti-viral effect was initially established by quantifying the intensity of eGFP signals in cells pre-treated with various concentrations of PC-IFNγ (with specific activity of 2X107 IU/mg protein). The relative activity of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 was then estimated using the standard curve.
FIGURE 5Biological activity of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 in suppressing IAV replication. MDCK cells were left uninfected or pre-incubated with DMEM (Mock), 800 ng of protein extracts from N. benthamiana healthy leaves as the negative control (N), or three different concentrations (50, 200, 800 ng) of PC- IFNγ, or SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10, for 12 h followed by infection with IAV at an M.O.I of 1.0. (A) Western blot analysis of viral protein expression levels. At 24 hpi, total cells were harvested and subjected to western blot analysis for the determination of expression of viral proteins NS1 and NP. The amount of actin was used as the internal loading control. (B) Quantification of protein levels of NS1 and NP by densitometry. The accumulation level of viral proteins in DMEM (Mock) treated cells was arbitrarily set as 100% and the relative protein accumulation levels in N, PC-IFNγ, and SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 relative to Mock was plotted. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison analysis. Mean expression ratio (%) and SD from three independent experiments with technical triplicates are presented. The P-value of < 0.001 was considered significantly different, as denoted by different letters.
FIGURE 6Secretion of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 in N. benthamina suspension cell culture. Suspension cells established from wilde-type (non-transgenic, N), transgenic N. benthamina line expressing mIFNγ (F2: 50-1-3), or four transgenic lines expressing SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 (F2: 3-6-5/3-9-4/4-5-1/4-14-9) were cultured in 25 ml SH media (containing 100 mg/L kanamycin). (A) Time course of cell biomass accumulation. (B) The production of secreted proteins in culture media analyzed by ELISA. (C) Detection of protein accumulation in the intracellular (IC) or secreted (S) fractions, analyzed by western blot with mIFNγ-specific antibodies, after an 8-day culture period. Various forms of SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10 proteins were indicated on the right. M, marker; P, positive control, purified mIFNγ protein derived from E. coli; Mγ, M mIFNγ; 1N-MG monoglycosylated mIFNγ, 2N-MG diglycosylated mIFNγ; MSP, M unprocessed SSExt mIFNγ(SP)10; DG, D Glyco-mIFNγ.