| Literature DB >> 28207991 |
Erick Miguel Ramos-Martinez1, Lorenzo Fimognari1, Yumiko Sakuragi1.
Abstract
Microalga-based biomanufacturing of recombinant <span class="Chemical">proteins is attracting growing attention due to its advantages in safety, metabolic diversity, sc<span class="Chemical">alability and sustainability. Secretion of recombinant proteins can accelerate the use of microalgal platforms by allowing post-translational modifications and easy recovery of products from the culture media. However, currently, the yields of secreted recombinant proteins are low, which hampers the commercial application of this strategy. This study aimed at expanding the genetic tools for enhancing secretion of recombinant proteins in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a widely used green microalga as a model organism and a potential industrial biotechnology platform. We demonstrated that the putative signal sequence from C. reinhardtii gametolysin can assist the secretion of the yellow fluorescent protein Venus into the culture media. To increase the secretion yields, Venus was C-terminally fused with synthetic glycomodules comprised of tandem serine (Ser) and proline (Pro) repeats of 10 and 20 units [hereafter (SP)n , wherein n = 10 or 20]. The yields of the (SP)n -fused Venus were higher than Venus without the glycomodule by up to 12-fold, with the maximum yield of 15 mg/L. Moreover, the presence of the glycomodules conferred an enhanced proteolytic protein stability. The Venus-(SP)n proteins were shown to be glycosylated, and a treatment of the cells with brefeldin A led to a suggestion that glycosylation of the (SP)n glycomodules starts in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Taken together, the results demonstrate the utility of the gametolysin signal sequence and (SP)n glycomodule to promote a more efficient biomanufacturing of microalgae-based recombinant proteins.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990C. reinhardtiizzm321990; glycomodule; protein secretion; signal sequence; yellow fluorescent protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28207991 PMCID: PMC5552477 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Biotechnol J ISSN: 1467-7644 Impact factor: 9.803
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the expression cassettes. (a) pERC‐Venus; (b) pERC‐SSVenus; (c) pERC‐SSVenus‐(SP)10; (d) pERC‐SSVenus‐(SP)20. P, chimeric promoter RBCS2/HSP70A; solid line, RBCS2 intron 1; dotted line, RBSC2 intron 2; SS, gametolysin signal sequence. 3′UTR, BRSC2 terminator. The boxes on the right show the codon‐optimized nucleotide sequences used in this study to encode (SP) fusion tags. The peptide sequence of the gametolysin signal sequence is indicated.
Figure 2Subcellular localization and expression of fluorescent proteins from the Venus and SSVenus transgenic lines. (a) Western blot analysis of total proteins from cell lysates and supernatants (top panel). Total proteins were loaded in equal amounts and separated by SDS‐PAGE and visualized upon the UV irradiation (lower panel, indicated as ‘stained gel control’). Transgenic lines were grown until ~2 × 106 cells/mL in TAP media. Harvested cells (C) and supernatants (S) were resuspended in 4× Laemmli buffer. The untransformed UVM4 strain was used as a control. (b) Expression of Venus in C. reinhardtii cells visualized by confocal microscopy. Parental strain UVM4 was used as a control. Cells transformed with pERC‐Venus (Venus line) and pERC‐SSVenus (SSVenus line) were analysed. All images were acquired using the same settings for all strains. Scale bar indicates 5 μm.
Figure 3Introduction of (SP) glycomodules enhances the yields of secreted Venus in C. reinhardtii. (a) Secretion yields of selected transgenic lines determined by dot blotting. Concentrations of Venus in the culture media from five lines for each construct were quantified using purified E. coli‐derived Venus as a standard. Supernatants from SSVenus‐(SP)10 and SSVenus‐(SP)20 selected lines were collected after 7 days of cultivation and used directly for dot‐blot analysis. Means of three technical replicates and standard errors are shown. Statistical analysis was performed using a one‐way ANOVA (P < 0.05). The asterisk represents a significant difference from SS01. (b). Fluorescence emission from cells grown on agar plates detected with a stereo fluorescence microscope. Fluorescence was detected under the same settings for all colonies. i, untransformed UVM4; iii, Venus; iii, SSVenus; iv, SSVenus‐(SP)10; v, SSVenus‐(SP)20. Scale bars indicate 1 mm.
Figure 4The secreted Venus‐(SP) proteins are glycosylated. (a) Western blot analysis of fusion glycoproteins secreted into the media by the transgenic C. reinhardtii. M, molecular size markers. One hundred micrograms of total proteins in the media were loaded in each lane for SSVenus, SSVenus‐(SP)10 and SSVenus‐(SP)20, whereas 1 μg of purified E. coli‐derived Venus was loaded as a control. (b) Effect of deglycosylation treatment with TFMS on the fusion glycoproteins. SSVenus‐(SP)10 and ‐(SP)20 proteins were chemically deglycosylated and analysed by Western blot. Untreated and TFMS‐treated samples were loaded on parallel lanes for comparison. E. coli‐derived Venus, designated as Venus STD, was loaded as a control. M, molecular size markers. SP10 and SP20 indicate SSVenus‐(SP)10 and SSVenus‐(SP)20, respectively.
Growth parameters and yields of the secreted proteins from transgenic cell lines secreting Venus variants and the parent UVM4 strain
| Maximum biomass (cells/mL) | Specific growth rate (day−1) | Doubling time (days) | Maximum yields (mg/L) | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UVM4 | 2.20 × 107 | 1.38 | 0.50 | – | – |
| SSVenus | 2.26 × 107 | 1.29 | 0.54 | 1.3 | 0.19 |
| Venus‐(SP)10 | 2.08 × 107 | 1.38 | 0.50 | 7.7 | 1.10 |
| Venus‐(SP)20 | 2.25 × 107 | 1.43 | 0.48 | 15.1 | 2.13 |
Figure 5Growth of the transgenic lines of C. reinhardtii secreting Venus and fusion Venus is not affected by the production of the recombinant proteins. (a) Growth curves of the transgenic lines and the parental strain UVM4 under the mixotrophic conditions at 25 °C, under constant illumination at 120 μmol photons m−2 s−1. Strains were inoculated in TAP media at the OD750nm value of 0.05. Growth was monitored by cell counting for 7 days. Error bars represent standard errors of at least three independent cultures. There was no statistically significant difference between genotypes based on two‐way ANOVA test (P > 0.05). (b) Time course of Venus‐SP10 and Venus–SP20 secretions in the growth media. Cell line SP04 expressing SSVenus‐(SP)10 (upper panel); cell line SP14 expressing SSVenus‐(SP)20 (lower panel). Samples were taken from shake flasks every 24 h for 7 days. Twenty microlitres of clarified supernatants for each sample were separated on SDS‐PAGE and analysed by Western blot. Lanes 1–7 correspond to samples from 0‐ to 7‐day‐old culture supernatants; molecular size markers are indicated as M. Solid arrow indicates the fusion proteins; open arrows represent non‐glycosylated protein.
Figure 6Effect of the BFA treatment on the subcellular localization and molecular masses of the Venus and fusion Venus. Transgenic cells in the exponential growth phase were treated with BFA at 50 μm or solvent control (DMSO) for 4 h. (a) Alteration of the fluorescence patterns in cells secreting Venus and fusion Venus upon treatment with BFA visualized by confocal microscopy. Images show that BFA treatment increases the fluorescence intensity in the transgenic cells as a result of the accumulation in the ER. All images were acquired using the same settings for all strains and treatments. Scale bars indicate 5 μm. (b) Western blot analysis of cell lysates from cells treated with BFA. Lanes 1 and 4, SSVenus; lanes 2 and 5, SSVenus‐(SP)10; lanes 3 and 6, SSVenus‐(SP)20. One hundred and fifty micrograms of TSP were loaded into each well.
Figure 7Profiles of proteolytic degradation of secreted fusion proteins. SSVenus, SSVenus‐(SP)10 and SSVenus‐(SP)20 fluorescence was monitored in the presence of trypsin for 4 h as described in Materials and methods. Quantification of the functional proteins was performed by using the standard curve prepared from purified E. coli‐derived Venus. Error bars represent standard errors of at least three independent assays. SSVenus, SSVenus‐(SP)10 and SSVenus‐(SP)20 were statistically significantly different based on two‐way ANOVA test (P < 0.05).