Literature DB >> 33281323

Mechanisms of Hypoxia in COVID-19 Patients: A Pathophysiologic Reflection.

Mohana Nitsure1, Bhakti Sarangi1, Guruprasad H Shankar1, Venkat S Reddy1, Ajay Walimbe1, Varsha Sharma1, Shirish Prayag2.   

Abstract

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) causes severe hypoxemia which fulfills the criteria of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but is not accompanied by typical features of the syndrome. The combination of factors including low P/F ratios, high A-a gradient, relatively preserved lung mechanics, and normal pulmonary pressures may imply a process occurring on the vascular side of the alveolar-capillary unit. The scant but rapidly evolving data available on the pathophysiology are seemingly conflicting, indicating the relative dominance of intrapulmonary shunting or dead space in different studies. In this hypothesis paper, we attempt to gather and explain these observations within a unified conceptual framework by invoking the relative contributions of microvascular thrombosis, along with two proposed vascular mechanisms of capillary flow redistribution and flow through intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses (IPAVA). How to cite this article: Nitsure M, Sarangi B, Shankar GH, Reddy VS, Walimbe A, Sharma V, et al. Mechanisms of Hypoxia in COVID-19 Patients: A Pathophysiologic Reflection. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(10):967-970.
Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; Hypoxemia; Intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses

Year:  2020        PMID: 33281323      PMCID: PMC7689135          DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0972-5229


Despite the circadian increase in the available literature on coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), we are far from having a thorough understanding of its pathophysiology or established protocols for management. One of the more enigmatic unknowns for clinicians worldwide in the pathophysiology of COVID-19 is the mechanism/s by which it causes severe hypoxia with relatively preserved lung mechanics, especially in the early stages. The rapidly evolving data on the subject has prompted us to postulate a multifold pathophysiologic approach to these mechanism/s and their dynamic transition as well as overlap. It is postulated that hypoxemia in COVID-19 is resultant of a V/Q mismatch due to a vascular pathology,[1] especially in the early stages. Loss of hypoxic pulmonary vasoregulation has been attributed as a mechanism in this scenario. As per Gattinoni et al.,[2] the lungs in the early phase (referred to as L type/type I) are characterized by low elastance, low recruitability, low ventilation to perfusion (V/Q) ratio, with computed tomography (CT) scan showing ground glass opacities only subpleurally and along fissures (presumably due to increased stress and strain in these areas from increased respiratory drive leading to high work of breathing). In this scenario, pulmonary artery pressures were found to be normal. In 16 patients, they showed respiratory system compliance of 50.2 ± 14.3 mL/cm H2O associated with shunt fraction of 0.50 ± 0.11, a high shunt fraction/to fraction of gasless tissue (3.0 ± 2.1).[3] In contrast, Mauri et al.[4] demonstrated elevated ventilation–perfusion mismatch, with larger prevalence of ventilated nonperfused lung units (dead space) in comparison to perfused nonventilated units (shunt) with a dead space to shunt ratio of 2.3 (n = 7). We would like to hypothesize a theoretical model of the interplay of a various concepts in an attempt to explain these dilemmas. The model involves the following components with a simultaneous spatial interaction and a temporal progression. Microvascular thrombosis is well documented to occur in COVID-19. The pulmonary microvascular thrombosis as demonstrated in autopsy studies[5] and reflecting in elevated D-dimer levels[6] and the chest CT as subsegmental vascular enlargement in vicinity of areas with ground glass opacities[7] has been consistently reported and associated with increased mortality. The elevated levels of markers such as D-dimer, fibrinogen,[8] and interleukin 6[7] (IL-6) in published data are also supportive of a hypercoagulable state resulting from the underlying inflammatory process. Physiologically, the implication of this process in the context of the lung represents dead space with reduced/absent pulmonary capillary flow without affecting ventilation, thus leading to a high V/Q ratio. The same concept creates a window for the contemplation of therapeutic anticoagulation using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)[7] in patients with increased D-dimer, be it in the early phase of the disease. We hereby suggest two mechanisms of intrapulmonary vascular involvement, at the capillary as well as the precapillary level. The overt inflammatory process occurring in COVID-19 may be presumed to cause capillary hyperperfusion due to inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) production, release of nitric oxide (NO), and local vasodilation. Both neutrophilic[5,8] and complement[5] activation, which have been demonstrated in COVID-19, may also lead to iNOS[9-11] expression. In early stages, inflammation is expected to occur in a nonuniform manner in the lungs, leading to uneven distribution of capillary perfusion with a sprinkled alveolar scatter. This process leads to some alveolocapillary units with low V/Q ratios (normal/reduced ventilation but hyperperfused), henceforth referred to as type A units and other units in which this pathology is not occurring in the early stages, what we here on refer to as type B units. Hyperperfusion of the type A units will lead to a circulatory steal of flow from type B units, reducing their perfusion, while ventilation remains unchanged increasing the V/Q. The scatter of units with differing V/Q ratios in the same lung leads to mismatch and hypoxemia. Precapillary shunts are known to exist in lungs of healthy individuals termed intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses (IPAVA).[12] They are present in fetal life, and regress to some extent postnatally, and remain closed except in some circumstances as demonstrated in various studies (exercise, acute normobaric hypoxia, and β-adrenergic stimulation).[13] Although there are limited data on the physiological and pathophysiological roles of these vascular conduits, opening of these channels may well be hypothesized to occur with NOS expression, since such a mechanism has been shown in other causes of intrapulmonary shunting, like hepatopulmonary syndrome.[14] Also, opening of these channels may be considered in the prothrombotic adult population with COPD who are more prone to flow through the IPAVA.[15] These precapillary shunts cause hypoxemia by leading to decreased/absent capillary perfusion, again without compromising ventilation and have a high V/Q ratio. The presence of large diameter precapillary shunts in presence of a preexisting and/or superimposed hyercoagulable state may serve as an alternate pathway for thromboembolism and help explain the increased prevalence of cerebrovascular events described in various case series. Blood flow through these anastomoses is also inversely proportional to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2),[13] thus leading to further contemplation of such patients requiring higher FiO2 to improve their oxygen saturation, despite no significant alveolar edema at this stage. In both the abovementioned processes, since there is no alveolar hypoxia/diffusion abnormality, there may not be a trigger for hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction,[16] and pulmonary artery pressures in consequence may be normal as has been postulated by Gattinoni et al.[2] All the abovementioned scenarios may lead to hypoxemia, low P/F ratios, and a high A-a gradient as seen in COVID-19 with fairly well-preserved lung compliance and may occur simultaneously in the earlier stages of the disease. They may cause dead space (microvascular thrombosis and precapillary shunt) or intrapulmonary shunt due to capillary flow redistribution. Hypoxemia thus induced will lead to increased respiratory drive through the stimulation of peripheral and central chemoreceptors, but the minute ventilation increase cannot improve the oxygenation since it would not affect vascular processes. The end result is a hypoxic–hypocapnic respiratory failure. The lungs will not be recruitable, as the compliance is already good, but proning may help oxygenation by improving the V/Q matching due to flow redistribution. The reversal of the proposed pathophysiology may vary depending on the extent and duration of inflammatory cascade, presence of contributing comorbidities, the treatment instituted, and secondary infection if any. Recent experiences have demonstrated a possible shifting paradigm in the management of these patients from early invasive mechanical ventilation to a trial with more gentle supports individualized based on ongoing physiological assessment[17] through HFNC/NIV, early anti-inflammatory medications, and anticoagulation and is in tune with the proposed interplay of pathophysiologic mechanisms. The findings in dual-energy CT imaging of the lung have also pointed to a possible role for previously underappreciated pulmonary vascular shunting in patients with COVID-19 as demonstrated by Lang et al.[18] recently. (Increased perfusion to areas of inflammation) As the illness progresses, features typical of the traditional acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are seen with low compliance, better recruitability, and high lung weight[2]—units that we would like to term type C. Although the division of subtypes help with conceptual understanding, practically there will be overlap and eventual progression will occur with worsening parenchymal involvement. The patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) occurring due to a combination of increasing negative intrathoracic pressure due to deep tidal breathing and increased lung permeability due to inflammation contribute to the development of type C units causing interstitial lung edema.[19] Pulmonary hypertension may not be recorded in the early phases but can manifest when ARDS progresses. Type A and B alveoli eventually change to type C and become the majority population with typical ARDS histology, physiology, imaging features, and pulmonary mechanics. The coming together of all the abovementioned mechanisms and their temporal progression has been represented in the Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1.
Table 1

Proposed chronologic progression in early stage COVID 19

Type A alveoli (L type)Type B alveoli
Mildly inflamed (early stage)Normal
Good compliance and low elastanceSame
Microthrombi start forming in capillaries and arterioles and increasing leading to dead space locally (increasing V/Q)Microthrombi in capillaries/arterioles may be present in these units also.
Vascular obstruction leads to more flow redistribution to type B alveoliLow V/Q, venous admixture
iNOS—capillary dilation and/or pre-capillary shunting—IPAVANormal vessels, IPAVA
Hypoxic vasoconstriction is lostNot relevant
Venous admixture begins to increaseCirculatory steal begins from type A alveoli
Low V/Q ratios locally (capillary dilation), High ratio if IPAVAHigh V/Q ratios due to circulatory steal (dead space)
Contribute to global hypoxia in a big wayAlso contribute
Clinically increasing dyspnea, tachypnea, P-SILISame
Low V/Q ratios in type A and high V/Q ratios in type B both contribute to global hypoxia in the initial phases
Management—HFNC or NIV, early intubation (less preferable), gentle ventilation with low PEEP as dictated by the compliance, deep sedation, paralysis/anti-inflammatory medications, anticoagulation

V/Q, ventilation/perfusion; IPAVA, intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomosis; INOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; NO, nitric oxide; HFNC, high flow nasal cannula; NIV, noninvasive ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; P-SILI, patient self inflicted lung injury

Table 2

Chronology of late phase alveolar events

Type C alveoli (H type)
Increasing inflammation, alveoli, interstitium and vessels are all involved
Gradual worsening of compliance and ARDS pathology progresses
Type A and B alveoli get converted to type C with low V/Q ratios over time
Hypoxia due to venous admixture, shunting from alveolar involvement, added to dead space caused by worsening microthrombi.
Further increase in dyspnea, tachypnea, P-SILI
CO2 rises in contrast to earlier stage, pulmonary hypertension which is not present earlier may become apparent as features of typical ARDS progress.
Management—mechanical ventilation with typical ARDS protocols including prone positioning, organ support

V/Q, ventilation/perfusion; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; P-SILI, patient self-inflicted lung injury

Fig. 1

Proposed chronology of events in COVID-19. V/Q, ventilation/perfusion; IPAVA, intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomosis; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; P-SILI, patient self-inflicted lung injury

Proposed chronologic progression in early stage COVID 19 V/Q, ventilation/perfusion; IPAVA, intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomosis; INOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; NO, nitric oxide; HFNC, high flow nasal cannula; NIV, noninvasive ventilation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; P-SILI, patient self inflicted lung injury Chronology of late phase alveolar events V/Q, ventilation/perfusion; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; P-SILI, patient self-inflicted lung injury Proposed chronology of events in COVID-19. V/Q, ventilation/perfusion; IPAVA, intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomosis; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; P-SILI, patient self-inflicted lung injury The above discussed pathophysiologic approach is based on the available literature, and our understanding of pulmonary physiology and attempts to unify the stands taken by different groups when explaining extremes of the mechanisms of hypoxia caused by COVID-19 with a dynamic representation of events occurring simultaneously and over time. We anticipate the rigors of expert scrutiny and encourage further studies. All said and done, the slightest contribution to better patient outcomes through these deliberations, if at all, would be a satisfactory outcome indeed.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses in humans--response to exercise and the environment.

Authors:  Andrew T Lovering; Joseph W Duke; Jonathan E Elliott
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Marco Ranucci; Andrea Ballotta; Umberto Di Dedda; Ekaterina Bayshnikova; Marco Dei Poli; Marco Resta; Mara Falco; Giovanni Albano; Lorenzo Menicanti
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  The role of the complement cascade in endotoxin-induced septic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Alexander Jacob; Lauren K Hensley; Bryan D Safratowich; Richard J Quigg; Jessy J Alexander
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications in COVID-19: Report of the National Institute for Public Health of the Netherlands.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Harry R Büller; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Nick van Es; Sytse F Oudkerk; Theresa McLoud; Diederik Gommers; Jaap van Dissel; Hugo Ten Cate; Edwin J R van Beek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Hypoxaemia related to COVID-19: vascular and perfusion abnormalities on dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Min Lang; Avik Som; Dexter P Mendoza; Efren J Flores; Nicholas Reid; Denston Carey; Matthew D Li; Alison Witkin; Josanna M Rodriguez-Lopez; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Brent P Little
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  COVID-19 Does Not Lead to a "Typical" Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; Silvia Coppola; Massimo Cressoni; Mattia Busana; Sandra Rossi; Davide Chiumello
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Complement associated microvascular injury and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 infection: A report of five cases.

Authors:  Cynthia Magro; J Justin Mulvey; David Berlin; Gerard Nuovo; Steven Salvatore; Joanna Harp; Amelia Baxter-Stoltzfus; Jeffrey Laurence
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 7.012

8.  COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes?

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; Davide Chiumello; Pietro Caironi; Mattia Busana; Federica Romitti; Luca Brazzi; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Basing Respiratory Management of COVID-19 on Physiological Principles.

Authors:  Martin J Tobin
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Alejandro Lagunas-Rangel
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 20.693

View more
  7 in total

1.  Co-expression analysis to identify key modules and hub genes associated with COVID-19 in platelets.

Authors:  Ahmed B Alarabi; Attayeb Mohsen; Kenji Mizuguchi; Fatima Z Alshbool; Fadi T Khasawneh
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.622

2.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Rahul A Pandit; B N Gagana; Charudatt Vaity; Bindu Mulakavalupil; Jitendra S Choudhary; Vivek Jain; Pramila M Chandan; Harsh Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-09

3.  The impact of COVID-19 on populations living at high altitude: Role of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) signaling pathway in SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication.

Authors:  Christian Albert Devaux; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Thromboprophylaxis in COVID-19 - Rationale and considerations.

Authors:  Sotirios Bristogiannis; Dawn Swan; Jecko Thachil
Journal:  Adv Biol Regul       Date:  2021-07-23

5.  Physical Fitness Differences, Amenable to Hypoxia-Driven and Sarcopenia Pathophysiology, between Sleep Apnea and COVID-19.

Authors:  Vasileios T Stavrou; George D Vavougios; Stylianos Boutlas; Konstantinos N Tourlakopoulos; Eirini Papayianni; Kyriaki Astara; Ilias T Stavrou; Zoe Daniil; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Imaging Pulmonary Blood Vessels and Ventilation-Perfusion Mismatch in COVID-19.

Authors:  Dnyanesh N Tipre; Michal Cidon; Rex A Moats
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.484

7.  Research and Development of a COVID-19 Tracking System in Order to Implement Analytical Tools to Reduce the Infection Risk.

Authors:  Erik Vavrinsky; Tomas Zavodnik; Tomas Debnar; Lubos Cernaj; Jozef Kozarik; Michal Micjan; Juraj Nevrela; Martin Donoval; Martin Kopani; Helena Kosnacova
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.